Moderator: Community Team
t-o-m wrote:Should I be banned for using the server?
Stupid, selfish old me. GTFO tom.
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
Yeah, sure, not obeying an admin deserves a perma-ban...JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:so he was asked not do it and he did anyway? Sounds legit to me.
No. Not being able to read a PM sent by the admin because they were not allowed to use a part of the feature deserves a perma-ban..4myGod wrote:Yeah, sure, not obeying an admin deserves a perma-ban...JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:so he was asked not do it and he did anyway? Sounds legit to me.
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
16 times he ignored your warnings? Jesus, I would have stopped after 1 and banned him.jpcloet wrote:Yes and he did it 16 times, lol.
Hey, JR, stop being a turd and realise that TOM CANNOT SEE HIS PM'S.JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:16 times he ignored your warnings? Jesus, I would have stopped after 1 and banned him.jpcloet wrote:Yes and he did it 16 times, lol.
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
Oh cool.JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:Rules
Cheaters and troublemakers detract from the gaming experience of all Conquer Club players, and proactive measures are employed to protect our membership. Conquer Club reserves the right to suspend accounts and cancel Premium Memberships, with or without warning, of those players who are deemed to have violated the rules.
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
Oh come on skittles, thats an easy one. It must be up his arse, because thats where his head is.Skittles! wrote:Oh cool.JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:Rules
Cheaters and troublemakers detract from the gaming experience of all Conquer Club players, and proactive measures are employed to protect our membership. Conquer Club reserves the right to suspend accounts and cancel Premium Memberships, with or without warning, of those players who are deemed to have violated the rules.
But where's the rule which says he cannot find loop holes in the system because the admin haven't foreseen it? There is no rule saying he cannot apply for membership of clans that he cannot see.
Where is THAT rule, tooter?

This is pure trolleryJOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:Rules
Cheaters and troublemakers detract from the gaming experience of all Conquer Club players, and proactive measures are employed to protect our membership. Conquer Club reserves the right to suspend accounts and cancel Premium Memberships, with or without warning, of those players who are deemed to have violated the rules.
Cheaters and troublemakers detract from the gaming experience of all Conquer Club players, and proactive measures are employed to protect our membership. Conquer Club reserves the right to suspend accounts and cancel Premium Memberships, with or without warning, of those players who are deemed to have violated the rules.Skittles! wrote:Oh cool.JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:Rules
Cheaters and troublemakers detract from the gaming experience of all Conquer Club players, and proactive measures are employed to protect our membership. Conquer Club reserves the right to suspend accounts and cancel Premium Memberships, with or without warning, of those players who are deemed to have violated the rules.
But where's the rule which says he cannot find loop holes in the system because the admin haven't foreseen it? There is no rule saying he cannot apply for membership of clans that he cannot see.
Where is THAT rule, tooter?
I don't see how joining clans that he can't even see the forums to detract from the gaming experience for the players of CC.JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:Cheaters and troublemakers detract from the gaming experience of all Conquer Club players, and proactive measures are employed to protect our membership. Conquer Club reserves the right to suspend accounts and cancel Premium Memberships, with or without warning, of those players who are deemed to have violated the rules.Skittles! wrote:Oh cool.JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:Rules
Cheaters and troublemakers detract from the gaming experience of all Conquer Club players, and proactive measures are employed to protect our membership. Conquer Club reserves the right to suspend accounts and cancel Premium Memberships, with or without warning, of those players who are deemed to have violated the rules.
But where's the rule which says he cannot find loop holes in the system because the admin haven't foreseen it? There is no rule saying he cannot apply for membership of clans that he cannot see.
Where is THAT rule, tooter?
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
Agreed Skittles!. You are a troublemaker JR, causing problems in this thread. You should be banned.JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:Cheaters and troublemakers detract from the gaming experience of all Conquer Club players, and proactive measures are employed to protect our membership. Conquer Club reserves the right to suspend accounts and cancel Premium Memberships, with or without warning, of those players who are deemed to have violated the rules.Skittles! wrote:Oh cool.JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:Rules
Cheaters and troublemakers detract from the gaming experience of all Conquer Club players, and proactive measures are employed to protect our membership. Conquer Club reserves the right to suspend accounts and cancel Premium Memberships, with or without warning, of those players who are deemed to have violated the rules.
But where's the rule which says he cannot find loop holes in the system because the admin haven't foreseen it? There is no rule saying he cannot apply for membership of clans that he cannot see.
Where is THAT rule, tooter?
I think it's fairly obvious that mods simply used the infraction as an excuse because t-o-m (along with similarly perm/forum-banned users as of late) was on their 'shit-list'.Skittles! wrote:I can see the reason why he could of been banned. He found a loop hole. Woop-e-doo.
When someone is banned from the forums, they cannot control pm's/wall/control panel which controls their profile, such as signature and email.
however, it's obvious that you can still look at clans, and that you can join them. this is not tom's fault, it's the admins fault, for not making it impossible to be able to join clans and usergroups.
he was just pointing out the loop hole. no reason to ban him for it.
edit: it seems like you can get banned for finding loop holes. i can't see this on the guidelines or rules.
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
Actually... t-o-m was removed from all of his private forums when his forum ban was enacted. This isn't a "loophole" that the admins didn't foresee. He was attempting to rejoin groups after having been removed from them as part of his forum ban, a forum which includes private usergroups and clan forums as well.lgoasklucyl wrote:I think it's fairly obvious that mods simply used the infraction as an excuse because t-o-m (along with similarly perm/forum-banned users as of late) was on their 'shit-list'.Skittles! wrote:I can see the reason why he could of been banned. He found a loop hole. Woop-e-doo.
When someone is banned from the forums, they cannot control pm's/wall/control panel which controls their profile, such as signature and email.
however, it's obvious that you can still look at clans, and that you can join them. this is not tom's fault, it's the admins fault, for not making it impossible to be able to join clans and usergroups.
he was just pointing out the loop hole. no reason to ban him for it.
edit: it seems like you can get banned for finding loop holes. i can't see this on the guidelines or rules.
The fact that he managed to circumvent per joining a clan is something programmers should have taken care of prior to him doing it. If it's that serious of an offense that someone can be site-banned, perhaps they should have taken the time to fix such an outright atrocity from occurring...
The loop hole is that he could still join them. Not see them, but join them.Optimus Prime wrote:Actually... t-o-m was removed from all of his private forums when his forum ban was enacted. This isn't a "loophole" that the admins didn't foresee. He was attempting to rejoin groups after having been removed from them as part of his forum ban, a forum which includes private usergroups and clan forums as well.lgoasklucyl wrote:I think it's fairly obvious that mods simply used the infraction as an excuse because t-o-m (along with similarly perm/forum-banned users as of late) was on their 'shit-list'.Skittles! wrote:I can see the reason why he could of been banned. He found a loop hole. Woop-e-doo.
When someone is banned from the forums, they cannot control pm's/wall/control panel which controls their profile, such as signature and email.
however, it's obvious that you can still look at clans, and that you can join them. this is not tom's fault, it's the admins fault, for not making it impossible to be able to join clans and usergroups.
he was just pointing out the loop hole. no reason to ban him for it.
edit: it seems like you can get banned for finding loop holes. i can't see this on the guidelines or rules.
The fact that he managed to circumvent per joining a clan is something programmers should have taken care of prior to him doing it. If it's that serious of an offense that someone can be site-banned, perhaps they should have taken the time to fix such an outright atrocity from occurring...
Dancing Mustard was removed from his usergroups, FredVIII was removed from his, etc. This isn't a new practice.
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
Optimus Prime wrote:Actually... t-o-m was removed from all of his private forums when his forum ban was enacted. This isn't a "loophole" that the admins didn't foresee. He was attempting to rejoin groups after having been removed from them as part of his forum ban, a forum which includes private usergroups and clan forums as well.lgoasklucyl wrote:I think it's fairly obvious that mods simply used the infraction as an excuse because t-o-m (along with similarly perm/forum-banned users as of late) was on their 'shit-list'.Skittles! wrote:I can see the reason why he could of been banned. He found a loop hole. Woop-e-doo.
When someone is banned from the forums, they cannot control pm's/wall/control panel which controls their profile, such as signature and email.
however, it's obvious that you can still look at clans, and that you can join them. this is not tom's fault, it's the admins fault, for not making it impossible to be able to join clans and usergroups.
he was just pointing out the loop hole. no reason to ban him for it.
edit: it seems like you can get banned for finding loop holes. i can't see this on the guidelines or rules.
The fact that he managed to circumvent per joining a clan is something programmers should have taken care of prior to him doing it. If it's that serious of an offense that someone can be site-banned, perhaps they should have taken the time to fix such an outright atrocity from occurring...
Dancing Mustard was removed from his usergroups, FredVIII was removed from his, etc. This isn't a new practice.
This what i want to know also. Its very hard to get message if you not alove to read.But is there a loophole through which he could rejoin them even though he was forum banned? and if so, in which way did you warn? As in what method did you use.
I'm not stating there's an actual magnetic-notepad on every teamCC member's fridge with 'Shit-list' scribbled across the top and periodic meeting to note members such as DM, t-o-m, bk, and other individuals who have been targeted. Rather, that teamCC has certain individuals they, whether individually or as a whole, develop vendettas with and do everything within and above their power to remove said individuals as quick as physically possible.Night Strike wrote:I doubt it was because t-o-m was on any "shit list" (b/c no such list exists). In fact, there weren't any comments about him recently, so maybe there was an e-ticket complaint from a member? I've asked to find out how t-o-m was warned, and his ban message said he could send in an e-ticket discussing the issue (which IS the proper channel for appeals).
After talking to t-o-m some more, and as my memory serves right, Tom wasn't actually removed from his private forums. He could still post in Spamalot, which he did.Optimus Prime wrote:Actually... t-o-m was removed from all of his private forums when his forum ban was enacted.
Kthxbai. Stop being pricks and just allow him to play the game, which he did no wrong for.Ask for a Print Screen of my PMed warning from KingAchilles in his SENT BOX.
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
Isn't true, so no agreement needs to be reached.Skittles! wrote:OP, and other admins/mods, just agree that you just got rid of Tom cause you could.