Conquer Club

got tonkaed wrote:i tried to respond to the exit only zone comment and realized it wasnt classy so i let it go.

Anyway back to the places in which we can get busy with mermaids. I second medefe's complaint about aestics regarding skull oriented issues.

Furthermore allow me to propose that in terms of utility apparently the knees can work for both parties, giving it an improvement that i cannot see in the reverse. I mean what exactly is using your armpits going to do for the bottom one? Presumably the fish head cannot have a smell fetish.

That brings us to the wholly new topic of fishy smells in various places of the (semi-)human body.

got tonkaed wrote:Anyway back to the places in which we can get busy with mermaids. I second medefe's complaint about aestics regarding skull oriented issues.

I suppose. Its inclusion would be a detriment to normal as the eyes contribute more beauty. The tally however remains unchanged...

But what exactly are we debating here? Neo has shown the upper human body to be more versatile than even I expected.

that seems like an easy battle though...the reverse does not have hands in which to bathe. And since it is not on land it is not as if it runs the added bonus of being in the water.

As per the original issue i suppose the upper probably does have more options.

got tonkaed wrote:

Neoteny wrote:The fishy thing confounds that theory surely. Anyhow, this thread has taken an amusing turn. I believe I've seen shoulder/neck interactions at some point, to contribute...

surely we disqualify the fishy member on the grounds that if you were using a member you would prefer the superior one?

though i cant say i know enough to make that assumption about superiority i guess.

I was actually referring to the exit only comment, class be damned. I can elaborate, but, in the proper context, I'm not sure it's necessary.

Continuing on this note, I have nothing against fishy members, but I am led to believe that many fish don't have a penis. See salmon spawning. Sharks have claspers which are penis-like, but who wants to try to f*ck a shark. I mean really. In reality, it would be easier for a male human to successfully achieve something close to sex with many types of male fish than a male fish doing anything other than spraying everywhere (which might have a notable corollary in human mating) with a human female.

To be fair, gills are something to add to the upper/lower debate that would serve as a counter to my previous shoulder/neck bit.

Neoteny wrote:To be fair, gills are something to add to the upper/lower debate that would serve as a counter to my previous shoulder/neck bit.

presumably though we are counting them as one, as that seems to be the general practice. I was prefacing my comment about exits from lingustic difficulties if that makes sense. I do have to concede a fair bit in regards to fish anatomy though it seems.

Neoteny wrote:To be fair, gills are something to add to the upper/lower debate that would serve as a counter to my previous shoulder/neck bit.

True, but even when working under the assumption that reverse mermaids breathe air as easily as normal mermaids breathe under water this could cause cause problems with breathing overall. And even Urbandictionary doesn't have a definition of "lungjob".

MeDeFe wrote:

Neoteny wrote:To be fair, gills are something to add to the upper/lower debate that would serve as a counter to my previous shoulder/neck bit.

True, but even when working under the assumption that reverse mermaids breathe air as easily as normal mermaids breathe under water this could cause cause problems with breathing overall. And even Urbandictionary doesn't have a definition of "lungjob".

urban dictionary aside, enough celebrities have died of autoasphyxiation to make the lack of air not a deterrent in the right circumstances.

got tonkaed wrote:

MeDeFe wrote:

Neoteny wrote:To be fair, gills are something to add to the upper/lower debate that would serve as a counter to my previous shoulder/neck bit.

True, but even when working under the assumption that reverse mermaids breathe air as easily as normal mermaids breathe under water this could cause cause problems with breathing overall. And even Urbandictionary doesn't have a definition of "lungjob".

urban dictionary aside, enough celebrities have died of autoasphyxiation to make the lack of air not a deterrent in the right circumstances.

That lack has to my knowledge never been induced by penetration, though.

Not to mention, there's is a lot of easily injured tissue in the gills. But we need to include the sadists too, if we're being inclusive.

We could always create a lungjob entry. Perhaps it'll be best served as a variant of throatfuck. I'm not sure that's an internet meme we can be proud of though.

Neoteny wrote:Not to mention, there's is a lot of easily injured tissue in the gills. But we need to include the sadists too, if we're being inclusive.

We could always create a lungjob entry. Perhaps it'll be best served as a variant of throatfuck. I'm not sure that's an internet meme we can be proud of though.

But if the subject expires due to lack of oxygen the sadist can no longer indulge in their pleasures.

Neoteny wrote:Not to mention, there's is a lot of easily injured tissue in the gills. But we need to include the sadists too, if we're being inclusive.

We could always create a lungjob entry. Perhaps it'll be best served as a variant of throatfuck. I'm not sure that's an internet meme we can be proud of though.

I mean i would be all for making a provision that actions need to be consensual if this is some type of partner thing. However given the lingustic difficulties (im preparing to count having sex with knees but not some crazy notion that fish suddenly speak human languages) i dont see how this can be possible.

Agreed on both counts. I voted human top, for the record.

MeDeFe wrote:But if the subject expires due to lack of oxygen the sadist can no longer indulge in their pleasures.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.p ... ecrophilia

Neoteny wrote:Agreed on both counts. I voted human top, for the record.

yeah im pretty sure it has to be human top even though ive done some arguing for the versatility of human bottom (chuckle)

john9blue wrote:

MeDeFe wrote:But if the subject expires due to lack of oxygen the sadist can no longer indulge in their pleasures.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.p ... ecrophilia

Dead people, including fish-people, do not feel pain.

john9blue wrote:

MeDeFe wrote:But if the subject expires due to lack of oxygen the sadist can no longer indulge in their pleasures.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.p ... ecrophilia

I'd be tempted to say that, being on a deserted island, sushi might be a smarter alternative, though I have no idea what word could possibly begin to encompass what that might be.

MeDeFe wrote:Dead people, including fish-people, do not feel pain.

I'm not an expert, but I would assume someone with both fetishes would be able to discard one in favor of the other.

The criteria are far too vague. I admit that earlier I did not give aesthetics enough importance. That would certainly explain the poll results.

Neoteny wrote:

john9blue wrote:

MeDeFe wrote:But if the subject expires due to lack of oxygen the sadist can no longer indulge in their pleasures.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.p ... ecrophilia

I'd be tempted to say that, being on a deserted island, sushi might be a smarter alternative, though I have no idea what word could possibly begin to encompass what that might be.

There are many food fetishes, exluding such obvious candidates as cucumbers, bananas and the like, there is the thermos flask filled with boiled spaghetti (not hot any more, merely warm), various fruits with firm yet elastic skin that can have a hole in them, and of course the aphrodosiacs.

john9blue wrote:

MeDeFe wrote:Dead people, including fish-people, do not feel pain.

I'm not an expert, but I would assume someone with both fetishes would be able to discard one in favor of the other.

Even a subject of necrophilia will only last for so long, at some point the decay will win.

I believe Steve Tyler mentions practicing on a peach in some song (walk on water? I don't know if that's the title of the song, but it seems to be prevalent in the verses), and there's much to be said for spaghetti. Though I can't claim to have considered it as a sexual thing, I have had bizarre urges with spaghetti; ie stuffing as much in my mouth as possible (not recommended). And I believe someone in Patch Adams wanted to bathe in spaghetti. I wonder what that's about. Maybe it has to do with it having a unique texture.

Neoteny wrote:I'd be tempted to say that, being on a deserted island, sushi might be a smarter alternative, though I have no idea what word could possibly begin to encompass what that might be.

Consensual?

Close... needs more fish, but it's got the cannibalism down pat.

That is still something rather nonrecurring, it's not as if you can be eaten again and again, especially alive. Furthermore this assumes that the non-fishy party has a fetish for eating others alive.

Guess im just a sick f*ck lol