Well, if it eases your pain, you weren't killed by Faith.edocsil wrote:f*ck!!!!! I knew I was screwed today, too large a slipup to go unnoticed. Pissed I couldn't take Buffy with me. More pissed that I got killed by Faith.
Moderator: Community Team
Well, if it eases your pain, you weren't killed by Faith.edocsil wrote:f*ck!!!!! I knew I was screwed today, too large a slipup to go unnoticed. Pissed I couldn't take Buffy with me. More pissed that I got killed by Faith.

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
I guess Doc would have protected me from the block allowing me to kill Ga7, so you might be telling the truth. On the other hand, if you are lying, Naxus will either contradict you or Naxus is in fact your last scum buddy, which we will find out after NK you.Anarkistsdream wrote:Edoc went to Mandy on night 3
Naxus didn't go anywhere on Night 4.
Those were my two results... I still can't believe ANY of you people think I'm scum. *roll*

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
mandalorian2298 wrote:I guess Doc would have protected me from the block allowing me to kill Ga7, so you might be telling the truth. On the other hand, if you are lying, Naxus will either contradict you or Naxus is in fact your last scum buddy, which we will find out after NK you.Anarkistsdream wrote:Edoc went to Mandy on night 3
Naxus didn't go anywhere on Night 4.
Those were my two results... I still can't believe ANY of you people think I'm scum. *roll*
P.S. All this talk about NKing you shouldn't bother you if you are Town, since a Townie doesn't have to survive to win.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
I'm not sure about Anark/Angel(us) and his town status. This post by edoc is either saving face for trying to get mandy lynched, or trying to save Commander the GF saved by sacrificing Nark, who again is questionable as far as status.edocsil wrote:No he hasn't stated his abilities. Like he said minor abilities. I don't think that implies VT.safariguy5 wrote:So if I'm interpreting Commander right, he's basically claiming a VT role. Not doing that much to make me want to reconsider my vote.
Honestly unvote Vote Anark Try to lynch Buffy is right out. She is good and there is no real question about that. She has dark moments, but nothing like your own inherit evil. You have a soul, that leaves you with remorse but it does not absolve the dangers you present two the town.
seems almost an overt collaboration between Nark and edoc to keep Angel in the game, which would make sense if they had the chance to recruit him.Anarkistsdream wrote:Thank you! May I also comment on how Mandalorian has totally avoided the question I posed earlier about WHEN Angel was evil in Season 3. I have brought up many good points to my argument, called Mandy out as scum before anyone else thought he was doing anything wrong, and can prove that nowhere in Season 3 is Angel evil.edocsil wrote:Guys, would Angelus come up innocent? Of course not, his character is anything but subtle. Nark has welcomed in an investigation on himself, I can't see a cop doing anything else tonight, besides possibly investigating mandy. Vote mandy for trying to lynch a likely powerful town ally.
I even told you all my role color was green. Aren't ALL of those things pretty much proof?
Ironic since he's been flying under the radar the entire game, and didn't even say anything all of D2.Streaker wrote:So you don't see a need for extension, when the game has no lead, and a deadline coming up? As for the 'inspiration' to post, I don't see it anywhere. Not having much to say is kinda scummyVioIet wrote:I see no need for an extension, as deadlines can help to get a stalled game moving. It for one, inspired me to post. Just don't have much to say at the moment.![]()
Your post has inspired me to get this stalled game moving.
Unvote Vote Vio
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
I have been playing very poorly this gamestrike wolf wrote:Only voting on wagons that had already been started by others. Admitting to wagon hopping, popping up out of nowhere to vote on a wagon after extended periods of absence, simply tailing on another player's vote without adding any input, abandoning your only case of the game to jump on the newest popular wagon....
I like how you pop up right after you're called out. Nice trying to lay low there ;3Streaker wrote:Sorry about the inactivity, but I'm picking up again. For any sake, that's all you got against me. Besides, with only my inactivity against me, nark would still make a far better case.
Vote nark
No, because it's easy to say you're an asset to town when a) you're really not, and b) using it as a reason to not argue against the cases against you.Streaker wrote:I have been playing very poorly this gamestrike wolf wrote:Only voting on wagons that had already been started by others. Admitting to wagon hopping, popping up out of nowhere to vote on a wagon after extended periods of absence, simply tailing on another player's vote without adding any input, abandoning your only case of the game to jump on the newest popular wagon....![]()
There is little chance you will just back off when I say I'm an asset to town, right?
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
QFTFircoal wrote:I like how you pop up right after you're called out. Nice trying to lay low there ;3Streaker wrote:Sorry about the inactivity, but I'm picking up again. For any sake, that's all you got against me. Besides, with only my inactivity against me, nark would still make a far better case.
Vote nark
No, because it's easy to say you're an asset to town when a) you're really not, and b) using it as a reason to not argue against the cases against you.Streaker wrote:I have been playing very poorly this gamestrike wolf wrote:Only voting on wagons that had already been started by others. Admitting to wagon hopping, popping up out of nowhere to vote on a wagon after extended periods of absence, simply tailing on another player's vote without adding any input, abandoning your only case of the game to jump on the newest popular wagon....![]()
There is little chance you will just back off when I say I'm an asset to town, right?
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Streaker wrote:Sorry about the inactivity, but I'm picking up again. For any sake, that's all you got against me. Besides, with only my inactivity against me, nark would still make a far better case.
Vote nark
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
How I am worthwhile to be in this game? I'm certainly not nearly active enough, but I sure as hell have proven my worth by certain actions.Anarkistsdream wrote:Streaker wrote:Sorry about the inactivity, but I'm picking up again. For any sake, that's all you got against me. Besides, with only my inactivity against me, nark would still make a far better case.
Vote nark
How do I make a far better case? In fact, you certainly make a better case for lynch then I do... You have to PLAY to be worthwhile in this game, and you don't play... Ergo, you aren't worthwhile...
Pissing off a Vig does not lead to a death of old age./ wrote:I like how more than half of mandalorian's wagon died consecutively![]()
mandy-7- anark, commander, edoc, naxus, streaker, ga7, safari
Good scum ratio too, is it actually possible that the entire mafia hopped on the same wagon?
Rereading your case on p24 strike, I agree, from what we've seen it wouldn't hurt to put some pressure on him, especially seeing as we already have as much info as we're going to get with AD. Vote Streaker

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
Anarkistsdream wrote:
Edoc went to Mandy on night 3
Naxus didn't go anywhere on Night 4.
Those were my two results... I still can't believe ANY of you people think I'm scum. *roll*
He provides us with a couple of night results, but he could easily know where edoc went, being scummies.Mandy wrote:
I guess Doc would have protected me from the block allowing me to kill Ga7, so you might be telling the truth. On the other hand, if you are lying, Naxus will either contradict you or Naxus is in fact your last scum buddy, which we will find out after NK you.
P.S. All this talk about NKing you shouldn't bother you if you are Town, since a Townie doesn't have to survive to win.
All of a sudden he shows a lack of caring in the game? A general statement that he wants town to win... It just doesn't sound right to me.I just want to make sure that we always outnumber mafia and third party... Besides that, I'm good. I'm in enough other games, it doesn't bother me.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Certain actions, but you leave them ambiguous??? HahahaStreaker wrote:How I am worthwhile to be in this game? I'm certainly not nearly active enough, but I sure as hell have proven my worth by certain actions.Anarkistsdream wrote:Streaker wrote:Sorry about the inactivity, but I'm picking up again. For any sake, that's all you got against me. Besides, with only my inactivity against me, nark would still make a far better case.
Vote nark
How do I make a far better case? In fact, you certainly make a better case for lynch then I do... You have to PLAY to be worthwhile in this game, and you don't play... Ergo, you aren't worthwhile...
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Personally I think that if there are only 4 mafia members in an 18 player game that means either they have some pretty cool powers or that there are other baddies out there. So far we've only had Spike. Do you think that's good enough to merit there just being 4 scum?strike wolf wrote: 1. I think Faith may be the last scum meaning nark could be innocent. The scene suggests that faith was feeling alone and isolated. Probably a stretch but a 4 player mafia in an 18 player game doesn't sound unlikely to me.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.