Conquer Club

Chile and Holland advance... only one person I know who called it and the now big headed bastard is writing this post. And no, I haven't let anyone else use my account

looks like we have almost 3 teams eliminated, with cameroon losing and with 1 red card.

spain, autralia, cameroon... you guys will have to stay 1 more week to play a game with nothing in stake!

Croatia is going to beat Mexico.

Bollocks.

Serbia wrote:Croatia is going to beat Mexico.

Bollocks.

it would be even nicer if cameroon beats brazil

this way croatia finishes 1st and mexico 2nd.

croatia mexico is going to be a hell of a game. Mexico makes it in case of a tie, but I somehow see the whole thing 50/50.

netherlands-chile will probably end up with a tie.
so basically brazil-chile and netherlands-mexico?

universalchiro wrote:0-0 tie for Mexico versus Brazil is a victory for Mexico. All those lucky goal keeper blocks are from the good fortune of wearing Charlie Brown uniforms. Lol

Let's not forget that Mexico dominated until min 70, and they were the better side. Media seems to love Brazil too much to point out how shit they have been during the tournament!

Army of GOD wrote:If Spain doesn't advance, would they be the first country with the top ranking in the world to not advance out of the group stage?

France were probably #1 when they were eliminated from the 2002 group stages!

Which uniforms do you like?
Cameroon was colourful.
Holland was classy blue, but I'm partial to the crazy orange.

Which did you not like?
Russia's was a maroon colour, odd.
Australia's yellow and green has always bored me, yuck.

universalchiro wrote:Which uniforms do you like?
Cameroon was colourful.
Holland was classy blue, but I'm partial to the crazy orange.

Which did you not like?
Russia's was a maroon colour, odd.
Australia's yellow and green has always bored me, yuck.

I prefer the orange when it comes to Holland too.

I didn't like Colombia's full yellow!

trevor33 wrote:Chile and Holland advance... only one person I know who called it and the now big headed bastard is writing this post. And no, I haven't let anyone else use my account

Cheele you twat.

I emptied my account on Spain for this game, don't think I'll refill it. Damn unpredicatble Spain, how could you lose this game? Don't you understand you're out of the tournament now? Fucking cunts!

Gillipig wrote:I emptied my account on Spain for this game, don't think I'll refill it. Damn unpredicatble Spain, how could you lose this game? Don't you understand you're out of the tournament now? Fucking cunts!

They lost because Cheele played awesome, with hunger of triumph thing that the plares for Spain didnt have anymore.

The competition for the titles in Spain (including the champions) was almost too much.

nietzsche wrote:

Gillipig wrote:I emptied my account on Spain for this game, don't think I'll refill it. Damn unpredicatble Spain, how could you lose this game? Don't you understand you're out of the tournament now? Fucking cunts!

They lost because Cheele played awesome, with hunger of triumph thing that the plares for Spain didnt have anymore.

The competition for the titles in Spain (including the champions) was almost too much.

Holland was awesome in the last game too, but that does not excuse losing 5-1 against them. Chile played a tight game, didn't give Spain much room or scoring chances, but Spain should not need teams to give them chances, they're good enough to score goals when opposing teams play their best games and don't give away anything for free. The reason Spain didn't win this game can't be brushed away by mentioning that Chile played a great game, the real story is that Spain didn't play a great game themselves, had they done that there would've been nothing Chile could do to stop them from taking those three points, they're just not skilled enough. So in conclusion Chile didn't give Spain anything, but that was not why Spain lost, Spain lost because they didn't play at their potential, this is all Spain's own fault, they do not need Chile to play a bad game against them in order to win. So as much as Chile played a good game this all comes back to Spain underperforming in a big way.

Gillipig wrote:

nietzsche wrote:

Gillipig wrote:I emptied my account on Spain for this game, don't think I'll refill it. Damn unpredicatble Spain, how could you lose this game? Don't you understand you're out of the tournament now? Fucking cunts!

They lost because Cheele played awesome, with hunger of triumph thing that the plares for Spain didnt have anymore.

The competition for the titles in Spain (including the champions) was almost too much.

Holland was awesome in the last game too, but that does not excuse losing 5-1 against them. Chile played a tight game, didn't give Spain much room or scoring chances, but Spain should not need teams to give them chances, they're good enough to score goals when opposing teams play their best games and don't give away anything for free. The reason Spain didn't win this game can't be brushed away by mentioning that Chile played a great game, the real story is that Spain didn't play a great game themselves, had they done that there would've been nothing Chile could do to stop them from taking those three points, they're just not skilled enough. So in conclusion Chile didn't give Spain anything, but that was not why Spain lost, Spain lost because they didn't play at their potential, this is all Spain's own fault, they do not need Chile to play a bad game against them in order to win. So as much as Chile played a good game this all comes back to Spain underperforming in a big way.

I wanted to bet on spain too but waited for live betting. I was waiting for better odds on spain... And then chile scored... Then i was still thinking about it... Then at half time 0-2 for chile and a chile victory gave 1.34... I was like what the hell! Spain is sucking big time, 1.34 for a team winning 0-2.... Bring it!!!!!
I have already multiplied by 6 my bankroll since the wc started... I would need to cash out but i m being greedy..

Pirlo wrote:

Army of GOD wrote:If Spain doesn't advance, would they be the first country with the top ranking in the world to not advance out of the group stage?

France were probably #1 when they were eliminated from the 2002 group stages!

I saw a stat about this last night.
There was a first team I can t remember, maybe germany in the 50s, then brazil in the 1966 edition after being the 1962 champions, then france in 2002, then italy in 2010 and now spain in 2014.
So it s actually something that happens quite often.

betiko wrote:

Pirlo wrote:

Army of GOD wrote:If Spain doesn't advance, would they be the first country with the top ranking in the world to not advance out of the group stage?

France were probably #1 when they were eliminated from the 2002 group stages!

I saw a stat about this last night.
There was a first team I can t remember, maybe germany in the 50s, then brazil in the 1966 edition after being the 1962 champions, then france in 2002, then italy in 2010 and now spain in 2014.
So it s actually something that happens quite often.

AoG asked about being knocked out while top ranked, not title holder. FIFA ranking started in 1992!

GO URUGUAY!!!!

notyou2 wrote:GO HOME URUGUAY!!!!

nietzsche wrote:

trevor33 wrote:Chile and Holland advance... only one person I know who called it and the now big headed bastard is writing this post. And no, I haven't let anyone else use my account

Cheele you twat.

In English calling some numbnuts is nothing, calling them a twat is one step down from the 4 letter c word. Will be interesting if you get a ban for that. Probably not though...

trevor33 wrote:

nietzsche wrote:

trevor33 wrote:Chile and Holland advance... only one person I know who called it and the now big headed bastard is writing this post. And no, I haven't let anyone else use my account

Cheele you twat.

In English calling some numbnuts is nothing, calling them a twat is one step down from the 4 letter c word. Will be interesting if you get a ban for that. Probably not though...

Canada too.

trevor33 wrote:

nietzsche wrote:

trevor33 wrote:Chile and Holland advance... only one person I know who called it and the now big headed bastard is writing this post. And no, I haven't let anyone else use my account

Cheele you twat.

In English calling some numbnuts is nothing, calling them a twat is one step down from the 4 letter c word. Will be interesting if you get a ban for that. Probably not though...

You didn t get a ban for a word, you got a ban for constantly flaming and baiting me for an entire page.

betiko wrote:

trevor33 wrote:

nietzsche wrote:

trevor33 wrote:Chile and Holland advance... only one person I know who called it and the now big headed bastard is writing this post. And no, I haven't let anyone else use my account

Cheele you twat.

In English calling some numbnuts is nothing, calling them a twat is one step down from the 4 letter c word. Will be interesting if you get a ban for that. Probably not though...

You didn t get a ban for a word, you got a ban for constantly flaming and baiting me for an entire page.

B K Barant was banned for saying "knickers in a knot" or "panties in a bunch" or something like that.

betiko wrote:

trevor33 wrote:

nietzsche wrote:

trevor33 wrote:Chile and Holland advance... only one person I know who called it and the now big headed bastard is writing this post. And no, I haven't let anyone else use my account

Cheele you twat.

In English calling some numbnuts is nothing, calling them a twat is one step down from the 4 letter c word. Will be interesting if you get a ban for that. Probably not though...

You didn t get a ban for a word, you got a ban for constantly flaming and baiting me for an entire page.

An entire page? Refresh my memory, the only thing I remember saying is that Honduras was in central Amercia numbnuts, nothing after that.

trevor33 wrote:

betiko wrote:

trevor33 wrote:

nietzsche wrote:

trevor33 wrote:Chile and Holland advance... only one person I know who called it and the now big headed bastard is writing this post. And no, I haven't let anyone else use my account

Cheele you twat.

In English calling some numbnuts is nothing, calling them a twat is one step down from the 4 letter c word. Will be interesting if you get a ban for that. Probably not though...

You didn t get a ban for a word, you got a ban for constantly flaming and baiting me for an entire page.

An entire page? Refresh my memory, the only thing I remember saying is that Honduras was in central Amercia numbnuts, nothing after that.

it wasn't for that, it was for the 3 or 4 messages after that one. i don't know which page it was, but you got all those messages mod edited. what you are referring to didn't get mod edited, alas, that wasn't what you got banned for.

betiko wrote:

trevor33 wrote:

betiko wrote:

trevor33 wrote:

nietzsche wrote:

trevor33 wrote:Chile and Holland advance... only one person I know who called it and the now big headed bastard is writing this post. And no, I haven't let anyone else use my account

Cheele you twat.

In English calling some numbnuts is nothing, calling them a twat is one step down from the 4 letter c word. Will be interesting if you get a ban for that. Probably not though...

You didn t get a ban for a word, you got a ban for constantly flaming and baiting me for an entire page.

An entire page? Refresh my memory, the only thing I remember saying is that Honduras was in central Amercia numbnuts, nothing after that.

it wasn't for that, it was for the 3 or 4 messages after that one. i don't know which page it was, but you got all those messages mod edited. what you are referring to didn't get mod edited, alas, that wasn't what you got banned for.

Come on boys.. let's keep the thread cool and on topic.. please. Play nice!