Moderator: Community Team
I can confirm I got a PM saying I was roleblocked last night, and I doubt a scum roleblocker would come out with a claim like that, so I believe ptlowe is town (although misguided on this vote).ptlowe wrote:vote hotshot I role blocked him last night. No Isis was recruited last night based upon my reading of the story. We should win with a hotshot Lynch... BTW I'm NATO and my role is to roleblock at night. I think this is an easy lynch.
Pt
Hook. Line and Sinker.HotShot53 wrote:I can confirm I got a PM saying I was roleblocked last night, and I doubt a scum roleblocker would come out with a claim like that, so I believe ptlowe is town (although misguided on this vote).ptlowe wrote:vote hotshot I role blocked him last night. No Isis was recruited last night based upon my reading of the story. We should win with a hotshot Lynch... BTW I'm NATO and my role is to roleblock at night. I think this is an easy lynch.
Pt
My reading of the scene indicates there was one or more recruits last night, which probably includes ISIS.
Wing is not playing at all like himself in this game... and that vote on talpus just because talpus had wanted to give up is pretty weak... FOS Wing
DoomYoshi wrote:
vote talapus
You lying sack of cunt!

So basically you confirm you HAVE a role (and not being ordinary NATO sided country survivor) while you don't believe scum would come with such a claim?HotShot53 wrote:I can confirm I got a PM saying I was roleblocked last night, and I doubt a scum roleblocker would come out with a claim like that, so I believe ptlowe is town (although misguided on this vote).ptlowe wrote:vote hotshot I role blocked him last night. No Isis was recruited last night based upon my reading of the story. We should win with a hotshot Lynch... BTW I'm NATO and my role is to roleblock at night. I think this is an easy lynch.
Pt
If I was ISIS and looking for bandwagons to join yesterday, I would have joined the Talapus bandwagon; at the time I voted for mitch, Talapus was L-2, and me putting him at L-1 probably would have gotten him lynched since he wasn't defending himself. Instead I was the third vote for mitch because I felt he was the stronger case, and helped the momentum swing to mitch instead, and turns out we were right and he was ISIS. If I was ISIS I would have never voted for mitch at that point, I would have either gone with talapus or been "active" by starting a random case on someone else.dakky21 wrote:So basically you confirm you HAVE a role (and not being ordinary NATO sided country survivor) while you don't believe scum would come with such a claim?HotShot53 wrote:I can confirm I got a PM saying I was roleblocked last night, and I doubt a scum roleblocker would come out with a claim like that, so I believe ptlowe is town (although misguided on this vote).ptlowe wrote:vote hotshot I role blocked him last night. No Isis was recruited last night based upon my reading of the story. We should win with a hotshot Lynch... BTW I'm NATO and my role is to roleblock at night. I think this is an easy lynch.
Pt
From my point of view, either you or both of you are scum.
Everything points to the fact you're protecting ptlowe despite he voted you. Waiting for another bandwagon so you both can switch quickly???
Sorry hotshot if I'm wrong, but I'll just go and
unvote
vote HotShot
For some unknown reason (could be meta again), I believe you.HotShot53 wrote:If I was ISIS and looking for bandwagons to join yesterday, I would have joined the Talapus bandwagon; at the time I voted for mitch, Talapus was L-2, and me putting him at L-1 probably would have gotten him lynched since he wasn't defending himself. Instead I was the third vote for mitch because I felt he was the stronger case, and helped the momentum swing to mitch instead, and turns out we were right and he was ISIS. If I was ISIS I would have never voted for mitch at that point, I would have either gone with talapus or been "active" by starting a random case on someone else.
Since it seems I probably won't survive the day without claiming, I guess I have to claim... I am Russia and don't side with either NATO or ISIS, I'm just trying to mind my own business and stay out of the way. I am a pure third party survivor, not NATO sided, so I'm guessing I can't be recruited either, I just have to stay alive. Since the ISIS killer is dead, hopefully they won't be able to kill me for saying that I do actually have a power that I have been trying to help town with so far (although not too successfully yet). I am a random JOAT... I point at someone, and they have a 25% chance each of being roleblocked, killed, investigated, or doctored. Night 1 I pointed at Epitaph because I (along with many others day 1) were suspicious of him. I was informed I did a roleblock on him, which obviously didn't really do anything. Night 2 I targeted wing because he has been acting so strange this game, but obviously I was roleblocked so nothing happened.
This part means nothing if Talapus and you are both scum. It would be an excellent move on your part to target the 3rd scum to divert the votes.HotShot53 wrote:
If I was ISIS and looking for bandwagons to join yesterday, I would have joined the Talapus bandwagon; at the time I voted for mitch, Talapus was L-2, and me putting him at L-1 probably would have gotten him lynched since he wasn't defending himself. Instead I was the third vote for mitch because I felt he was the stronger case, and helped the momentum swing to mitch instead, and turns out we were right and he was ISIS. If I was ISIS I would have never voted for mitch at that point, I would have either gone with talapus or been "active" by starting a random case on someone else.
This part I am inclined to believe though.HotShot53 wrote: Since it seems I probably won't survive the day without claiming, I guess I have to claim... I am Russia and don't side with either NATO or ISIS, I'm just trying to mind my own business and stay out of the way. I am a pure third party survivor, not NATO sided, so I'm guessing I can't be recruited either, I just have to stay alive. Since the ISIS killer is dead, hopefully they won't be able to kill me for saying that I do actually have a power that I have been trying to help town with so far (although not too successfully yet). I am a random JOAT... I point at someone, and they have a 25% chance each of being roleblocked, killed, investigated, or doctored. Night 1 I pointed at Epitaph because I (along with many others day 1) were suspicious of him. I was informed I did a roleblock on him, which obviously didn't really do anything. Night 2 I targeted wing because he has been acting so strange this game, but obviously I was roleblocked so nothing happened.
So you are basically claiming sk?HotShot53 wrote:
Since it seems I probably won't survive the day without claiming, I guess I have to claim... I am Russia and don't side with either NATO or ISIS, I'm just trying to mind my own business and stay out of the way. I am a pure third party survivor, not NATO sided, so I'm guessing I can't be recruited either, I just have to stay alive. Since the ISIS killer is dead, hopefully they won't be able to kill me for saying that I do actually have a power that I have been trying to help town with so far (although not too successfully yet). I am a random JOAT... I point at someone, and they have a 25% chance each of being roleblocked, killed, investigated, or doctored. Night 1 I pointed at Epitaph because I (along with many others day 1) were suspicious of him. I was informed I did a roleblock on him, which obviously didn't really do anything. Night 2 I targeted wing because he has been acting so strange this game, but obviously I was roleblocked so nothing happened.
BuJaber wrote:This part means nothing if Talapus and you are both scum. It would be an excellent move on your part to target the 3rd scum to divert the votes.HotShot53 wrote:
If I was ISIS and looking for bandwagons to join yesterday, I would have joined the Talapus bandwagon; at the time I voted for mitch, Talapus was L-2, and me putting him at L-1 probably would have gotten him lynched since he wasn't defending himself. Instead I was the third vote for mitch because I felt he was the stronger case, and helped the momentum swing to mitch instead, and turns out we were right and he was ISIS. If I was ISIS I would have never voted for mitch at that point, I would have either gone with talapus or been "active" by starting a random case on someone else.
This only proves you are town if Talapus is also proved to be town.
DoomYoshi wrote:
vote talapus
You lying sack of cunt!


And you like the way Hotshot claims vig 3rd party survivor on day 3 under minimal pressure whilst claiming to have visited Epitaph N1, aka the guy who died...pershy wrote: If we are to believe HotShot then I would want to look at Wing who acuses him of being SK. Just didn't like the way he did it. However I don't think Wing is ISIS either....

Please define "definitely pro town" with a recruitable role claim. Karmas a b1tch.the white rose wrote:lol, i was right, attracted 3 votes cos i simply said I am keeping quiet cos everytime i post i get lynched.
how is that scummy?
how about this, is this scummy?
I am scum so you had better vote me off now.
For the record, I am definitely pro town, so it is not me looking scummy that gets me votes, it is you guys who cannot read me and always think i am scum, sometimes you know i do get a town role.
but hey, don't let that stop you from lynching me if you really think i am scum
I know that you claim day 1 with a survivor role... but if you look at my past games I usually don't. I think the risk of getting lynched day 1 because no-one has anyone better to lynch is too high to claim survivor on day 1. And people like IB would have been all in favor of lynching me then. Plus, with also having a role, I would have been in more danger of getting killed by scum early on if they didn't have anyone better to target, since I have a small chance of exposing them.WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:And you like the way Hotshot claims vig 3rd party survivor on day 3 under minimal pressure whilst claiming to have visited Epitaph N1, aka the guy who died...pershy wrote: If we are to believe HotShot then I would want to look at Wing who acuses him of being SK. Just didn't like the way he did it. However I don't think Wing is ISIS either....
Hotshot knows full well with that type of role you claim D1 or not at all. So not inclined to believe him at all.
I'm not sure how someone with 1 vote is "emerging as the favorite to be lynched today"... I don't even remember any discussion about him on day 1 or 2. This earns a FOS from me...the white rose wrote:hmm, it looks like i am emerging as the favourite to be lynched today.
Therefore, even though currently there is only one vote on me, i am going to claim.
I am Kuwait, Another Nato sided survivor, although i have been told that may change as the game progresses, i have had no notification that it has been changed.
I guess that means that i am available to be recruited to isis but as yet i have not been so recruited.
I could claim a power role such as doc in order to save my ass, however, being town i am reluctant to lie, I have no power role, no night actions whatsoever.
Lynching me would therefore not be a great loss to town, but we must try avoid a mislynch.
What makes this game especially difficult is that there is little to be gained by looking back as D1 someone behaving very townish could be recruited to isis on day 2.
So where do my suspicions lie?
Wing's accusation of hotshot being sk is ridiculous, he claims joat, there is absolutely no evidence that he is sk, just because he has a 25% chance of killing someone at night does not make him sk.
also keeping a close eye on tala, mainly cos of dakky's suspicion of him
Actually, I believe you too, because my role said the same thing. No way you could have known about "changes" as the game progresses, so that's it.the white rose wrote:I am Kuwait, Another Nato sided survivor, although i have been told that may change as the game progresses, i have had no notification that it has been changed.
From above, I'd lynch JBFloyd, Talapus, BuJaber, Pershy, IB or Wing. (in any order)1. Tobikera NATO
3. Ragian probably NATO
4. BGtheBrain replaced by Pershy unknown
5. JBFloyd unknown
7. the white rose probably NATO
8. Hotshot53 probably NATO
10. BuJaber unknown
11. Talapus unknown
12. WinstonTurqhill replaced Day 1 by WingCmdr Ginkapo unknown
13. iron butterfly unknown
14. dakky21 NATO
15. ptlowe probably NATO
How is hotshot probably nato when he claims he isnt.....dakky21 wrote:Actually, I believe you too, because my role said the same thing. No way you could have known about "changes" as the game progresses, so that's it.the white rose wrote:I am Kuwait, Another Nato sided survivor, although i have been told that may change as the game progresses, i have had no notification that it has been changed.
It leaves this from my point of view (quoted first post):From above, I'd lynch JBFloyd, Talapus, BuJaber, Pershy, IB or Wing. (in any order)1. Tobikera NATO
3. Ragian probably NATO
4. BGtheBrain replaced by Pershy unknown
5. JBFloyd unknown
7. the white rose probably NATO
8. Hotshot53 probably NATO
10. BuJaber unknown
11. Talapus unknown
12. WinstonTurqhill replaced Day 1 by WingCmdr Ginkapo unknown
13. iron butterfly unknown
14. dakky21 NATO
15. ptlowe probably NATO
My first target would be Pershy as I already said, because he was skimming the talk and posting bursts of words without saying anything useful.
vote pershy and let's see where that gets us.
It won't get you very far. And as for your accusations I think all posts are composed of words, not just mine. If you think I didn't say anything useful then that's a matter of opinion. As for skimming I admitted to skimming as I had to speed read 20 pages and apologised for it but tried to catch up to speed as best I could. Also if I had been NATO I would have tried to get on a bandwagon, but I didn't. I played it cautiously and wanted to put my vote where it would count. I didn't realise the deadline was so near, I missed it unfortunately but I had expressed my suspicion of MMdakky21 wrote: My first target would be Pershy as I already said, because he was skimming the talk and posting bursts of words without saying anything useful.
vote pershy and let's see where that gets us.
pershy wrote:I didn't find Madmitche's welcome scummy, I liked it. However it seems that my predecessor BG did find him scummy and since I'm following in BG's footsteps I have to take that into account. Also I didn't like where MM was on the vote list for Mandy
pershy wrote:Yes. Thanks for the vote count LSU. I'm still deciding where to put my vote. I'm reluctant to vote Talapus. Tal, we need to hear from you. I think he might be telling the truth but his claim got him heat. Over him and MM I'd be more likely to vote Mitch.
So I'm glad that I FOSed the person who turned out to be ISIS among my useless posts. As I said BG was well against MM - look back, by voting me you are also voting BG. So that is a wasted vote. Seriously, look back and try and decide if there is any way in the world BG and MM could be on the same side. Not a chance. Just sayin. I could quote a bunch of BG stuff but I won't bother, I will try and read back and do some scum hunting. If we look at MM throughout D1 and 2 we should be able to get a pretty clear idea who could also be ISIS. I plan to do that tonight.pershy wrote:Oh sorry - I missed the deadline. But for the record I agree with the decision to lynch MM.
BG also suspected him and having read back a bit I can see why. Fingers crossed we got it right this time....

