The Thing - Mafia Style [Winner=The Thing]

[animorpherv1]

Right now, I'm not sure what Ishould be doing, both are looking like sum to me, but I'm not sure which I would vote for:

both have about the same amount of logic, both seem to be scum to me, but Stroop is a L-2.

vote:Stoop I with 5fth on that one. We wanted you vigged, Stroop, and it turned out that Ace was killed, why would the Thing do that? To mak sure his/her partner doesn't die.

[spiesr]

We wanted you vigged, Stroop, and it turned out that Ace was killed, why would the Thing do that? To mak sure his/her partner doesn't die.

But despite being killed, ace did kill his target last night. Killing him did not stop that. He just did not kill stroop.

[spiesr]

I just thought of something. Why would the doctor not protect ace last night as he was the only confirmed player alive?

[Stroop]

vote:Stoop I with 5fth on that one. We wanted you vigged, Stroop, and it turned out that Ace was killed, why would the Thing do that? To mak sure his/her partner doesn't die.

Or to frame me, or just 'cos he was the vig. You don't believe me now, but you will

Anyway, pretty sure I'll be lynched, at least be sure that 5th is next.

I just thought of something. Why would the doctor not protect ace last night as he was the only confirmed player alive?

He isn't dead. He hasn't been assimilated (would have been in night 1, but ga7 claimed the doc protected him in night 2), so only the doctor knows

[F1fth]

Who is on both wagons (and where)? Who is on neither? And ace got NK'd the night when he was told by ga7 to vig Stroop. Why wouldn't scum let the vig take out a townie (if he is a townie)?

You know, that fact and your pointing it out now makes it seem even more that you are trying to remain blameless of the lynches.
Also, killing ace now did not stop him from killing his target so your logic is a little strained there...

I was blameless. I DIDN'T VOTE FOR EITHER OF THEM. You wanna try and blame the ga7 lynch when I was the only one who defended him? Whose logic is a little strained? And why is trying to be blameless a scumtell? Town don't want to get blamed for lynches because if they get lynched, the town is on a worse of for it. I'll accept my responsibility on the other lynches I've made but don't try to exaggerate my

And the fact that the kill went through is a moot point. Nobody knew whether it would or the scum's would count first. Why would scum take a risk on the vig (who should've been protected by the doctor) instead of taking a much safer kill and try to hit the doctor (especially since a townie was supposedly about to get vigged)? It doesn't add up.

@Stroop - why would scum frame you? Everyone thought you were about to get vigged, so they wouldn't have needed to do anything if you were town to get you killed.

[Stroop]

I was blameless. I DIDN'T VOTE FOR EITHER OF THEM. You wanna try and blame the ga7 lynch when I was the only one who defended him? Whose logic is a little strained? And why is trying to be blameless a scumtell? Town don't want to get blamed for lynches because if they get lynched, the town is on a worse of for it. I'll accept my responsibility on the other lynches I've made but don't try to exaggerate my

You were the one pulling the ga7 lynch into this in the first place. No-one was putting any blame on you for it, yet you felt it was necessary to point out that you had no part in it.

Trying to be blameless is not a scumtell, like you say everyone wants to be blameless. Trying very hard to be blameless does look bad though.

@Stroop - why would scum frame you? Everyone thought you were about to get vigged, so they wouldn't have needed to do anything if you were town to get you killed.

Because another day is wasted on lynching me. I very much hope that no-one put too much trust in ace vigging me (or anyone, I was surprised he killed someone at all)...

[F1fth]

That first part was directed at spiesr who said that "[I'm] trying to remain blameless of the lynches."

Trying very hard... I made a post two game days ago asking people before I hammered someone. Now, today that people make an accusation of me based solely on that fact, I point out to them that I cast no vote in either lynch and therefore cannot be blamed for the lynch. The only reason I even made the second comment was that people were gearing up to lynch me because of it.

I wouldn't really call that trying hard, would you?

[F1fth]

Who is on both wagons (and where)? Who is on neither? And ace got NK'd the night when he was told by ga7 to vig Stroop. Why wouldn't scum let the vig take out a townie (if he is a townie)?

You know, that fact and your pointing it out now makes it seem even more that you are trying to remain blameless of the lynches.
Also, killing ace now did not stop him from killing his target so your logic is a little strained there...

I was blameless. I DIDN'T VOTE FOR EITHER OF THEM. You wanna try and blame the ga7 lynch when I was the only one who defended him? Whose logic is a little strained? And why is trying to be blameless a scumtell? Town don't want to get blamed for lynches because if they get lynched, the town is on a worse of for it. I'll accept my responsibility on the other lynches I've made but don't try to exaggerate my offenses.

And the fact that the kill went through is a moot point. Nobody knew whether it would or the scum's would count first. Why would scum take a risk on the vig (who should've been protected by the doctor) instead of taking a much safer kill and try to hit the doctor (especially since a townie was supposedly about to get vigged)? It doesn't add up.

@Stroop - why would scum frame you? Everyone thought you were about to get vigged, so they wouldn't have needed to do anything if you were town to get you killed.

EBWOP -- forgot a word

[Stroop]

That first part was directed at spiesr who said that "[I'm] trying to remain blameless of the lynches."

Which he said after you said you weren't involved in both lynches. You are blameless, as far as I'm concerned, but why did you bring it up in the first place?

Trying very hard... I made a post two game days ago asking people before I hammered someone. Now, today that people make an accusation of me based solely on that fact, I point out to them that I cast no vote in either lynch and therefore cannot be blamed for the lynch. The only reason I even made the second comment was that people were gearing up to lynch me because of it.

It isn't about you voting or not voting, it is about you asking people if they wanted you to hammer even though, like you said yourself, will was dead anyway.

I wouldn't really call that trying hard, would you?

I would call your past few comments trying hard, but maybe that's just me.

[spiesr]

Now we have set stroop and f1fth at one another, so which one came out scum?

[F1fth]

That first part was directed at spiesr who said that "[I'm] trying to remain blameless of the lynches."

Which he said after you said you weren't involved in both lynches. You are blameless, as far as I'm concerned, but why did you bring it up in the first place?

Because it's important to look at more than one lynch before people make a decision. The ga7 lynch shows you hammering someone that I vocally had figured as likely town and would've been proven innocent later down the road should the doc claim.

Trying very hard... I made a post two game days ago asking people before I hammered someone. Now, today that people make an accusation of me based solely on that fact, I point out to them that I cast no vote in either lynch and therefore cannot be blamed for the lynch. The only reason I even made the second comment was that people were gearing up to lynch me because of it.

It isn't about you voting or not voting, it is about you asking people if they wanted you to hammer even though, like you said yourself, will was dead anyway.

I didn't want to just hammer before the claim, so I wanted to ask what people thought first. I figured Will was town, but it didn't really matter if I objected or not since the deadline was close. So essentially, what I said was " I'm thinking about hammering to expedite the game, any objections? " How does that make me scum?

I wouldn't really call that trying hard, would you?

I would call your past few comments trying hard, but maybe that's just me.

Well, I try hard when I'm accused, but wouldn't anyone? I thought your point was that I tried hard under no provocation (which I really didn't) indicating that I was likely scum. You're really making something out of nothing here.

[spiesr]

Well, stroop is at -1 so anybody who feels like it can hammer. Some more discussion might be desirable before the day ends though...
I assume you are both claiming researcher?

[spiesr]

Hey people post!

[Natewolfman]

Vote Count

Stroop - 4 votes (nagerous, F1fth, spiesr, animorpherv1)
F1fth - 1 vote (Its Bolt)

Not Voting: drake_259, dunc_2007, Stroop, sam_levi_11

With 9 players it takes 5(majority) to lynch

I am sending a prod to those who have yet to vote

[F1fth]

I've made my case. It's just that I don't think Bolt, drake, dunc, or Nag have checked the thread recently (so you may wanna prod Bolt and Nag as well, Nate). I know that drake and dunc are in need of replacing in other games as well, so I wouldn't be surprised if such is the case here as well. I'm still waiting to hear the evidence that justifies Bolt's vote on me. Nag is a sly man -- how he ever so quietly hoped on this wagon and is flying low on the radar catches my attention. But I don't mean to sidetrack the issue at hand.

We need a decision for this lynch. I'm not opposed to seeing Stroop hanged based on his actions during the previous two lynches, and the whole matter of the vig's timely death.

[Stroop]

drake and dunc need to be replaced.

I think this day has more than enough to base today's and possibly tomorrow's lynch on, so all we need is something done about the inactives.

[spiesr]

Well, let's get some replacements...

[sam_levi_11]

Sorry stroops but your arguement seems useless.

vote stroop

Now we find out if f1fth is lying or not

[Stroop]

Now we find out if f1fth is lying or not

Not really, just that I'm not the thing.

Anyway, you should bold that vote

Good luck town!

[sam_levi_11]

vote stroops

[sam_levi_11]

unvote vote stroop

what? I didnt like my accidental S

[Natewolfman]

Vote Count

Stroop - 5 votes (nagerous, F1fth, spiesr, animorpherv1, sam_levi_11)
F1fth - 1 vote (Its Bolt)

Not Voting: drake_259, dunc_2007, Stroop

Stroop (Killed VIA lynch) Human

Day scene soon to come

[Natewolfman]

Day 6
The day was quick, everyone know who to vote for, it had to be stroop, he lead the cause against ga7!... but once again the researchers were wrong, they have now killed 5 innocent people, can they pull it togeather in the coming days? only time will tell... The researchers retire for the night, many resigned to there fate.

Begin Night 6

[spiesr]

How long is night going to be do you think?
It's not like there are a lot of actions to resolve.

[Natewolfman]

How long is night going to be do you think?
It's not like there are a lot of actions to resolve.

48hours so at 6:00 PM today (7 1/2 hours)