Moderator: Community Team
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
While I do agree that he is scummy I think you kinda just read for the higlights and missed that it isn't fully true.naxus wrote:So vote streaker if his role doesn't show up in season 3(or is really obscure reference)
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
If either of those is true then I dont think his claims true as its been big characters from my understanding of buffy(Which isn't much tbh)Fircoal wrote:While I do agree that he is scummy I think you kinda just read for the higlights and missed that it isn't fully true.naxus wrote:So vote streaker if his role doesn't show up in season 3(or is really obscure reference)
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Unless you believe that it will directly affect the outgame of the game in Town's favor, I'd prefer that you don't.strike wolf wrote:I can confirm that I did visit mandy Night 3 which would explain why nark tracked edoc as visiting mandy yet mandy didn't get roleblocked. So yes that's a very solid claim (I had thought that maybe willow was the busdriver but Amy would make sense too). However now I'm thinking I may have to make a full claim...

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
And so my defense will wait until the case arrives~ ;3/ wrote:Hmm, if I might randomly die as a decoy, I wonder if I should share some info first.
But first some speculation.
I think that if the flavor of the scenes confirm the existence of both anya and faith, and faith is almost definitely the final mafia, I would avoid lynching naxus for the same reason I would avoid lynching AD at this point, They do not work for the mafia godfather Richard Wilkins. (I think?)
I will unvote vote fircoal I want some new info at this point, I feel that fircoal is among the most likely to be faith at the moment, I will put forward a full case a bit later.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Unless you can stay hidden... But yes. And we all know what happens to those...naxus wrote:Being a survivor sucks. Usually end up as the sacrificial lamb...
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
/ wrote: I feel that fircoal is among the most likely to be faith at the moment, I will put forward a full case a bit later.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
it really isn't such a big read that you couldn't get involved for over a week, this makes me think you didn't want to comment because you knew some associations it would bring (Such as three scummies being on one side?)strike wolf wrote:My point is that while it did happen the way planned in the show, Faith did try to recruit Angel so it's very likely faith would have a recruit mechanism with Angel...
Anyways mandy vs. Nark is living up to the legend. Still want to hear from someone like ga or pmc (actually I forgot to mention pmc requested to be replaced in my mafia...not sure if he made any such request in this game) or fircoal or anyone else who has more esxperience with these two until then I may as well give my second objective a try. *draws a book in throwing position* Wyndham! I'm coming to get my job back!
Fircoal wrote:I like how you pop up right after you're called out. Nice trying to lay low there ;3Streaker wrote:Sorry about the inactivity, but I'm picking up again. For any sake, that's all you got against me. Besides, with only my inactivity against me, nark would still make a far better case.
Vote nark
Fircoal wrote:GUYS I'M TRYING TO POST BUT I CAN'T COME UP WITH A PROPER DEFENSE! PLEASE DUN PUNCH ME! D:Streaker wrote:There's 2 ways this game can go now:
1) More votes on me, I claim, everyone unvotes, and starts voting someone else (I'm still thinking nark)
2) People actually believe me when I say I'm a good guy, and start voting whoever the hell they think is scum. There's just not enough activity going on (and yes, I'm fully aware of the irony in that statement).
My vote stays, for now.
Oh, and anark, that vote just smells like OMGUS...
3 times in two pages.....Fircoal wrote:Instead of posting a scummy message like this why don't you try to contribute to the discussion. This is pretty scummy too. You aren't the only one lurking though.Streaker wrote:Ugh. NOT LURKING, I just don't have anything usefull to contribute. As I have seen in Dexter, posting without substantial merit is also scummy...
Fircoal wrote: No, because it's easy to say you're an asset to town when a) you're really not, and b) using it as a reason to not argue against the cases against you.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Are you underestimating just how slow I can be? Cause I think you are. I had no idea what was going on and to be honest, I still don't know what happened then as I figured it'd probably be best to cut my loses and admit that I wasn't going to read fully up. You also have to remember will all that night I could have been read at the night./ wrote:Okay, Since the deadline is coming, I'll put this together a bit fast, sorry if it's messy, please correct any parts that aren't properly connected to flavor.
First, the most obvious offense, not posting one single thing from replacing TWO on feb 11 to Mar 01, night beginning on the 19th conveniently missing the ongoing mandy vs. ad & comm case that you were in fact asked to comment on as it involved vet meta-gaming experience
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
QFTstrike wolf wrote:Hmm with deadline approaching and streaker coming up with a solid town claim. I think /'s case against chu sounds as solid as any case.
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?