Conquer Club

I have reservations about any case presented if the accuser doesn't back it up with a vote.

Skoffin wrote: I don't know whether I'm just super good at reading Skittles or I'm just biased, but I read him as town.

I've got to be fair to Tails on one point; I hold my votes to the last minute all the time too, and I'm actually surprised I haven't gotten flak for it, so I'm a bit puzzled why he's getting that used against him.

A vote not cast means you are voting No Lynch. So everyone who isn't voting needs to explain why they think town should do nothing and let the scum win. I guess that isn't the popular meta, but it's the only way that makes sense to me. First post of the day, drop a vote, keep one on all day long.

i thoroughly disagree that you need to have a vote on at all times.

i only vote for someone that i am confident in my mind is playing scummy or requires pressure or needs to be lynched.

lord voldemort wrote:i thoroughly disagree that you need to have a vote on at all times.

i only vote for someone that i am confident in my mind is playing scummy or requires pressure or needs to be lynched.

So you think it's a good idea to waste your most powerful action? Might as well be a spectator.

As a fairly reserved voter myself, I agree with Lovos statement.

Skoffin is still rubbing me the wrong way. though looking back I admit my previous point isn't quite as strong as I thought and I did like her argument on the Caff-Chu connection. In short, I don't think she's mafia but I'm far from ruling out third party.

I also dislike Sam's recent posts but I think he's more likely recruit than recruiter (he demonstrated what appeared to be town knowledge day 1)

Skoffin wrote: I don't know whether I'm just super good at reading Skittles or I'm just biased, but I read him as town.

Or you are in the cult together.

You must've missed my previous post as I gave my two good reasons for admitting my action then.

DoomYoshi wrote:

lord voldemort wrote:i thoroughly disagree that you need to have a vote on at all times.

i only vote for someone that i am confident in my mind is playing scummy or requires pressure or needs to be lynched.

So you think it's a good idea to waste your most powerful action? Might as well be a spectator.

Eh? That's a pretty reasonable post from No-Nose. Why are you debating it?

Unvote

I'll be looking for a replacement for Fircoal. All votes on Fircoal are suspended. The deadline may or may not change.

Minister Masket wrote:
You must've missed my previous post as I gave my two good reasons for admitting my action then.

Your reasons were lousy.

Good point, Skoffin. vote tails

He's pushing a case he can't get behind with a vote after being called out. Scummy.

Ragian wrote:Good point, Skoffin. vote tails

He's pushing a case he can't get behind with a vote after being called out. Scummy.

Methinks you misunderstood skoffin's post.

-Tails

I'm drunk. Posting will wait till tomorrow.

Oh and another thing. f*ck you. I love you all. Except scum.

fircoal is scum, if he would be town then DDS could easily modkill him
since he is scum he can't cause that would be probably the end of scum

benga wrote:fircoal is scum, if he would be town then DDS could easily modkill him
since he is scum he can't cause that would be probably the end of scum

great theory

Madmitch has been revived and has taken Fircoals role.

Deadline remains the same.

do we need to change votes?

The votes on Fircoal originally have been erased. If you still want to vote for Madmitch, however, you'll have to vote him specifically. (All votes previously have been considered to be unvoted, no need to type that in if you voted Fircoal earlier).

I have returned and I realized there was a lot of votes against me because of non-posting but I have survide that awful Turian flu and ready to help catch scum.

lord voldemort wrote:

benga wrote:fircoal is scum, if he would be town then DDS could easily modkill him
since he is scum he can't cause that would be probably the end of scum

great theory

Is this sarcasm? I can kinda see it happening. FOS Mitch lmao

TA1LGUNN3R wrote:

Ragian wrote:Good point, Skoffin. vote tails

He's pushing a case he can't get behind with a vote after being called out. Scummy.

Methinks you misunderstood skoffin's post.

-Tails

Definitely did. Ragian has been playing differently than other games, but he has been scum every time. Either he is actually town this time, or is trying hard to appear non-scum. I think it may be the latter because he is jumping on votes despite saying;

Ragian wrote:I have reservations about any case presented if the accuser doesn't back it up with a vote.

Skoffin didn't vote for Tails, so why did you jump on him? FOS

Ragamuffin skims like a pro, or he wants to imply I said something I didn't. Keen to hear what he meant.

Sorry mitch, but I'm still keen on lynching you; I am still highly suspicious over how Caff reacted towards Chu.
vote MNitch

@ skoffin. what does caff and chu have to do with me? neither one is alive now and 1 was scum not sure what chu is yet , all I know is I am vanilla.

madmitch wrote:@ skoffin. what does caff and chu have to do with me? neither one is alive now and 1 was scum not sure what chu is yet , all I know is I am vanilla.

> replaces chu
> "not sure what chu is yet"
> claims vanilla

vote mitch

gg dds