Ice became suspiciously silent since we started to discuss / and Fircoal. He posted only once or twice during the last 48 hours. On the other hand he is extremely active in posting in all other games he is in. I saw at least 50-60 posts of him in other threads during the same period.
I got the impression that he is submarining and doesn't want to get the attention.
wicked wrote:I like Kalish's proposal. So Ice was on the chopping block (I think, is this the right game?), but said something cryptic about being unlynchable. Do we have any other leads?
I don't remember him telling that he is unlynchable. Where did you get this information wicked?
To be honest AD, i am not sure as too what to do now, since i agree, we shouldn't lynch either / or Fircoal, and wait to see what they have to say in the morning. But other than that, i dont really know where to go next or who to vote for. I am quite confuzed.
wicked wrote:I like Kalish's proposal. So Ice was on the chopping block (I think, is this the right game?), but said something cryptic about being unlynchable. Do we have any other leads?
I don't remember him telling that he is unlynchable. Where did you get this information wicked?
.
If he doesn't show up soon, I'll go back and try to find it. I really don't want to have to look thru 60 pages if I can avoid it!!
Yep it's true I've been deliberatly quiet here although I think 50 or 60 posts in a couple of days is exxaggetating a bit The reason is it's hard to defend myself without getting close to claiming as there's no real accusations for me to defend. With the pressure I'm under putting any theories of my own out or agreeing with anyone is just gonna be interpreted as scummy (I've learnt this over the last few weeks here) so I've just tried to stay under the radar a bit..
ice are you unlynchable / bullet proof or what - i dont remember that claim either also can you tell us more about your role and why we shouldnt lynch you
FOS all those on the sub list (on the last page) if ice is not our target i think we should focus on that list to find one
Don't now why people on here don't like being cooks, remember under siege: A former SEAL, now cook, is the only person who can stop a gang of terrorists when they sieze control of a US Navy battleship.
ok you fast posted me now we know we can lynch you please tell us why we shouldnt lynch you
Don't now why people on here don't like being cooks, remember under siege: A former SEAL, now cook, is the only person who can stop a gang of terrorists when they sieze control of a US Navy battleship.
So is what you were/are hinting at that you won't be lynched if you were pushed to claim?
Oh jesus christ can people not put 2 and 2 together
ummm three [size=0]ok it's really four bastards[/size]
I don't know one person that really would say otherwise to that answer whether they are scum or not since scum also seem to be fond of claiming townie roles other than GT in cc forum wars.
LSU Tiger Josh
The man, the myth, the legend has returned.
All I've been accused of is asking about PMs to try and catch Firth out which I've apoligised for 2 or 3 times, and no ones pointed out how it would actualy help scum.. just that "it sounds scummy". So yes theres an absence of defence, but it's mainly caused by the absence of defendable accusations.
But even now ice you are not answering our questions and putting yourself futher into suspiscion. It looks like you are trying to buy yourself time in order to have a good fake roleclaim. Very fucking scummy if I may say so myself.
So is what you were/are hinting at that you won't be lynched if you were pushed to claim?
Oh jesus christ can people not put 2 and 2 together
I think I know what you're talking about. I remember now the last time you said something like this, and it seems some aren't satisfied and feel the need to push. If you at some point turned up town, we can go after the pushers.
It's funny, but I think I want to vote wicked in this game...not earlier, but recently she's acting in a way that reminds me of GT's asylum game.
I think what we need is more activity from the submariners or we won't get anywhere.
I still think Fircoal is the best bet at this point. He's not shown up in this game in a while now, which IF he was a cop, I would think he'd put in more of an effort...hell, he even voted himself. How many of you, if you were a cop, would vote yourself and seemingly give up.
MountainLion wrote:I still think Fircoal is the best bet at this point. He's not shown up in this game in a while now, which IF he was a cop, I would think he'd put in more of an effort...hell, he even voted himself. How many of you, if you were a cop, would vote yourself and seemingly give up.
So far, I am the only one who would actually do that, I believe.
I think Fir is doing it because he is scared to say anything else, for fear of digging a deeper hole.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
The reason is it's hard to defend myself without getting close to claiming as there's no real accusations for me to defend. With the pressure I'm under putting any theories of my own out or agreeing with anyone is just gonna be interpreted as scummy (I've learnt this over the last few weeks here) so I've just tried to stay under the radar a bit..
I am quite confuzed.
