Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:02 pm
Tell us a story, Andy! 
-Sully
-Sully
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
https://conquerclub.com/forum/
If you have cable television, one of my friends will tell you a story on AMC. Here is a list of up-and-coming story times:Victor Sullivan wrote:Tell us a story, Andy!
-Sully


The number one complaint I hear about movies from the 60s is that they are too slow. So, I can assure you that you are in the minority with feeling that there is stuff missing.strike wolf wrote:Rosemary's Baby, Panic in Needle Park, Bullitt, The Great Escape, The Graduate, Dr. Strangelove. I know there's a couple others but I can't think of them right now.AndyDufresne wrote:What films have you watched from the 60's?strike wolf wrote:So I've watched a few 60s movies recently...I've noticed a trend and I'm wondering why some of them seem to start like they are already 5-10 minutes into the film? Like during editing the director's going "No no no this movies 2 hours. It needs to be 1 hour 50 at the most." and everyone replied "no problem. We'lll just edit out the first 10 minutes. No one wants to see how the couple met anyways. They just want to get to the good stuff where their lives are spiraling out of control from drugs."
**Munches on a banana**
--Andy
I remember the one-time I nearly watched a whole game of baseball on T.V. **Remembers it fondly. Munches on a banana**Quirks Wife wrote:http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/atlanta-braves-chipper-jones-says-2012-will-be-his-final-season-032212
I like character development so slow wasn't too much of an issue as long as the movie was well done. As far as spoon feeding information. I'm ok with being spoonfed the general stuff as long as we are given quality characters where I can delve into their actual personalities. Transformers is not a good example of that. I just felt like some of scenes that could have been dramatic were skipped over (especially towards beginning of movies) or shortened badly. Like in one movie it was the girl's first time using drugs and I felt there should have been at least I felt a scene a couple moments of hesitation to show that the character was nervous and that she was really thinking about it. instead the scene was really quick.DoomYoshi wrote:The number one complaint I hear about movies from the 60s is that they are too slow. So, I can assure you that you are in the minority with feeling that there is stuff missing.strike wolf wrote:Rosemary's Baby, Panic in Needle Park, Bullitt, The Great Escape, The Graduate, Dr. Strangelove. I know there's a couple others but I can't think of them right now.AndyDufresne wrote:What films have you watched from the 60's?strike wolf wrote:So I've watched a few 60s movies recently...I've noticed a trend and I'm wondering why some of them seem to start like they are already 5-10 minutes into the film? Like during editing the director's going "No no no this movies 2 hours. It needs to be 1 hour 50 at the most." and everyone replied "no problem. We'lll just edit out the first 10 minutes. No one wants to see how the couple met anyways. They just want to get to the good stuff where their lives are spiraling out of control from drugs."
**Munches on a banana**
--Andy
However, with the graduate in particular, the idea is that you don't figure out who all the characters are right away, but that you will figure it out through the dialogue. Today's movies spoonfeed relationships. Sample dialogue (from transformers): "this is my mom". That sort of spoonfeeding really has destroyed your brain if you are unable to figure how the characters relate to each other in the graduate. I am assuming you did figure it out, it just took you longer. That is a more naturalistic, less stylized approach to screenplay writing.
Anytime I think about watching Casablanca, I say to myself "Eh, I've seen this over 9000 times."AndyDufresne wrote:So, I forgot that yesterday Casablanca was going to be shown in theaters across the USA, as part a 70th anniversary sponsored by Turner Classic Movies channel. I wanted to go see the film on the big screen, but by the time I remembered, the last showing was underway.
**Leaves behind a bowl of despondent bananas**
--Andy
You could rent a school room with a large screen and do a private showing. As part of the CC WW2 maps action plan meeting that you are about to host at the school (nudge, nudge, wink, wink).AndyDufresne wrote:So, I forgot that yesterday Casablanca was going to be shown in theaters across the USA, as part a 70th anniversary sponsored by Turner Classic Movies channel. I wanted to go see the film on the big screen, but by the time I remembered, the last showing was underway.
**Leaves behind a bowl of despondent bananas**
--Andy
Apt choice. It's Kurosawa's 102nd birthday.AndyDufresne wrote:I'll just watch it this weekend by myself. I'll probably have an old film-a-thon...perhaps I'll watch The Seven Samurai and Bicycle Thieves as well.
**Leaves behind a black and white banana**
--Andy

Definitely not on the fence. Wanted to see it this weekend but it's already been sold out.DoomYoshi wrote:I always get worried when a movie is hyped. Hunger games was worth the hype. The first 30 mins or so were blah, but the last 2 hours made up for it. You should definitely see this if you are on the fence.
I'll see it in a couple of years maybe.DoomYoshi wrote:2 days since last post. Nobody cares about my random pop culture facts anymore