Moderator: Tech Team
This does need changing. I have put the same criteria on rank progression as the site does ... which is perhaps a little too much per map.BaldAdonis wrote:When a player's score is under -1000, he goes back to being called a New Recruit. I suppose this is just the way it's coded (if (games>5)&&(rank>x) then... else New Recruit). Since a player can't go lower than 1 in the scoring system, there's no way to say what he would actually be called. This is not really necessary to fix, I just thought it was funny to have it say "You need this many points to attain the rank of Cook".
So essentially remove "New Recruit" as a rank? I suppose it doesn't matter, people can see if you've played fewer than 5 games on any setting.chipv wrote:I think maybe just removes the games criterion as that makes it difficult per map.
Yep plus removal of required games played. Just keep it on points.BaldAdonis wrote:So essentially remove "New Recruit" as a rank? I suppose it doesn't matter, people can see if you've played fewer than 5 games on any setting.chipv wrote:I think maybe just removes the games criterion as that makes it difficult per map.
Full rescan will sort it out. Iceland has been inserted into the middle of the maplist so your saved data will be shifted.firth4eva wrote:I got 16 unique defeats on iceland and I only played that map once. And I lost
Yeah, it's a first pass only, the guts of it are done, so can ask people for ideas on making it look better.Night Strike wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
You are amazing.
I still think some things could be improved upon on the graph display, but it's definitely better than nothing. This update should have been 1.6.0 or 2.0.0 with this great addition.
Have you done a full rescan? (Toggle Rank and Points checkbox etc)tryagain wrote:These charts look like a superb extra feature. Quite a few people have been calling for something like this for a while. Thanks for the hard work.
I can get a clickable cursor but don't seem to be able to bring up the charts at present. Is there something obvious I have missed?

Just replying now...FATHARRY wrote:Hey chip
How easy is it to get maprank to generate average opponent's rating points?
See also my thread: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... =6&t=59621
Any thoughts about implementation of what I have laid out in this thread?
Harry
Yes it is possible but surely more suited to a site modification?jiminski wrote:hey Chip, would it be easy to add a Map territory count to the Game finder page?
Classic 42 etc.
It would be useful for Tournament organisers in choosing maps suited to different numbers of players. And the same for Clans, to help guide maps in Challenges.
Also, I can't speak for map makers, but it may help them identify gaps in types of maps.
cheers, jim

However we all know that lack is much more likely to install something to the site if someone else can do the bulk of the coding first. (Just like how he waits for php to make some mods rather than doing them himself.)chipv wrote:Yes it is possible but surely more suited to a site modification?
These numbers never change and are contained in reasonably fixed .xml files so
for data that is fixed, I think the site could provide it in the game finder.
The list would always need to be updated for new maps of course.
So, yes it would be very easy to put into a script, save away the data after the first read and poll for updates...
but easier perhaps to do from the site.
You need to do a full rescan because there are new maps in the maplist which push the saved map rank data out of alignment.Big Whiskey wrote:Is any1 having errors in there map rank?I am 13-0 on chinese checkers but it says i am 1-8...its the new one 1.62,i installed it yesterday.So,is any1 else having the same problem?
If you just want to look at points, then you can use the charts to do this.RedRover23B wrote:Chip,
Is it possible to have map rank show only the games played for a that day or a selected time period?
For example, you can change the player and the map but what about instead of it being for every game ever played allow an option for it to be only for the last 24 hours or only for games played on the 18th or games that have been played between the 10th and the 18th.
Would this be too much trouble to do? Very good job with the script by the way, it is very useful.
Yeah, good call, I'll see what I can do, thanks for the feedback!OliverFA wrote:The new version is really amazing! It is the dream of any statistics lover![]()
A small change that I think would improve the graphics would be to calculate the lower value of the scale. Right now, it is always 0. The result is the the lines are only on the top part of the graph, and the lower part is not used.