Moderator: Community Team
That actually does help, as it narrows the field down to 6 people.everywhere116 wrote:Vig is higher than my role. Not that it helps much.

EBWOPSome7hingCLEVER wrote:vig was my number one choice but I didn't get it
I meant to quote CLEVER. I was wondering why he said it didn't help much.drunkmonkey wrote:That actually does help, as it narrows the field down to 6 people.everywhere116 wrote:Vig is higher than my role. Not that it helps much.

you confuse me loldrunkmonkey wrote:I meant to quote CLEVER. I was wondering why he said it didn't help much.drunkmonkey wrote:That actually does help, as it narrows the field down to 6 people.everywhere116 wrote:Vig is higher than my role. Not that it helps much.
I'm not the vig. Assuming CLEVER's telling the truth, either atl1978, Djfireside, soundman, nagerous or dazza got the vig role.Alt1978 – 11
MoB – 14 (replaced by drunkmonkey)
Djfireside – 17
Soundman – 22
Nagerous - 6
Dazza – 6
Somethingclever – 9

I am also not the vig. Do we need a top 6 mass claim here? Could out a fair bit of town power but would catch the Vig. assuming Clever is telling the truth.drunkmonkey wrote:If vig was CLEVER's first choice, but he didn't get it, that means someone above him took it. Here's the top of the list.I'm not the vig. Assuming CLEVER's telling the truth, either atl1978, Djfireside, soundman, nagerous or dazza got the vig role.Alt1978 – 11
MoB – 14 (replaced by drunkmonkey)
Djfireside – 17
Soundman – 22
Nagerous - 6
Dazza – 6
Somethingclever – 9

Pretty much. Even if the vig is town, with no doctor he is screwed if he comes out, barring some other unforeseen protection. We also don't have enough reason to declare one way or the other that the vig is scum. One faulty nightkill is standard, albeit ill-advised on night 1. For these reasons I will echo what I said on day 1: "I support you in this endeavor and think that the vig deserves some scrutiny. On Day 3. First we lynch ghost."pmchugh wrote:
I have a feeling that no one will own up to being the vig, in which case we scum hunt between them. We make cases and decide who we each would like to claim first. If they pass then we move on to the next player.
Trying to let more people get killed?everywhere116 wrote:Pretty much. Even if the vig is town, with no doctor he is screwed if he comes out, barring some other unforeseen protection. We also don't have enough reason to declare one way or the other that the vig is scum. One faulty nightkill is standard, albeit ill-advised on night 1. For these reasons I will echo what I said on day 1: "I support you in this endeavor and think that the vig deserves some scrutiny. On Day 3. First we lynch ghost."
With another possible night kill we also would have more info.
i do see the logic in this posteverywhere116 wrote:No. I don't want more people killed, but I don't think we're going to get the vig to claim nor should we even want a townie vig to claim without a doctor or any compelling reason to believe that the vig is scum. I think discussing the possibility is fine, but actively hunting for him is too risky.
If the town vig shot freezie or raigan, then (s)he is an idiot. The only problem I have is that the JOAT may be the one that shot. Although I would expect the mafia to get vig anyway. The vig should definitely claim if townie, I'd much rather lose a vig than a watcher/tracker/cop.everywhere116 wrote:No. I don't want more people killed, but I don't think we're going to get the vig to claim nor should we even want a townie vig to claim without a doctor or any compelling reason to believe that the vig is scum. I think discussing the possibility is fine, but actively hunting for him is too risky.
Hmm. While the line I underlined is pretty conclusive evidence that you are on crack, I can see your logic behind wanting to lynch a scum vig rather than a normal scum (and if ghostly is scum he is most likely the framer). You want to decrease the rate at which townies die. I can understand that.pmchugh wrote:If the town vig shot freezie or raigan, then (s)he is an idiot. The only problem I have is that the JOAT may be the one that shot. Although I would expect the mafia to get vig anyway. The vig should definitely claim if townie, I'd much rather lose a vig than a watcher/tracker/cop.everywhere116 wrote:No. I don't want more people killed, but I don't think we're going to get the vig to claim nor should we even want a townie vig to claim without a doctor or any compelling reason to believe that the vig is scum. I think discussing the possibility is fine, but actively hunting for him is too risky.
Anyway the main point is that removal of the vig gives us an extra day compared with removal of standard mafia. If we lynch blue today then it is MYLO and we will likely have straight up counter claims tomorrow aka a coin toss.
On crack? You think vig is more valuable than an investigative role? Vigilantes have nothing but their own intuition and if they are wrong then they f*ck it up for town, if a cop is wrong he just clears someone. Plus there is a busdriver in this game, if he is a townie then he can switch people about to f*ck up the kill.everywhere116 wrote:Hmm. While the line I underlined is pretty conclusive evidence that you are on crack, I can see your logic behind wanting to lynch a scum vig rather than a normal scum (and if ghostly is scum he is most likely the framer). You want to decrease the rate at which townies die. I can understand that.pmchugh wrote:If the town vig shot freezie or raigan, then (s)he is an idiot. The only problem I have is that the JOAT may be the one that shot. Although I would expect the mafia to get vig anyway. The vig should definitely claim if townie, I'd much rather lose a vig than a watcher/tracker/cop.everywhere116 wrote:No. I don't want more people killed, but I don't think we're going to get the vig to claim nor should we even want a townie vig to claim without a doctor or any compelling reason to believe that the vig is scum. I think discussing the possibility is fine, but actively hunting for him is too risky.
Anyway the main point is that removal of the vig gives us an extra day compared with removal of standard mafia. If we lynch blue today then it is MYLO and we will likely have straight up counter claims tomorrow aka a coin toss.
7th? If anything that is too low for a townie, not too high.alt1978 wrote:In response to the conversation going on...I am not the vig. It's location on my list doesn't much matter since I got my first pick...but for the record it was 7th. That may seem a little high for town...but i had a pretty good understanding of the role so that's why i put it there.
In response to the general idea by pmc...I think it's a really good one. If nothing else...this is going to pin folks down to going on the record for x, y, and z. The idea specifically that I am referring to is the rate of attrition...so to stop the bleeding if you will...tracking down the vig has a ton of merit.


Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
edocsil wrote:This could work.pmchugh wrote:Yes that would be nice. Is there anyone who can narrow the vig window down?
Also, if the vig is town he should just straight up claim and explain why he killed or place blame on the JOAT if he didn't.
Why the change of heart?edocsil wrote:2) somebody's lying ~ duh? Not like the vig is gonna claim...


You're running on the assumption that the vig made the kill and that the vig is mafia. What is s/he didn't make the kill and s/he's town? Then by making them come forward just so you can lynch them does not benefit the town. All you're doing then is losing a town PR and putting town into a worse position. And no way is anyone going to say "Oh yeah, I'm the vig and I'm Town" because they know you just want to lynch the vig no matter their alignment.pmchugh wrote:If the town vig shot freezie or raigan, then (s)he is an idiot. The only problem I have is that the JOAT may be the one that shot. Although I would expect the mafia to get vig anyway. The vig should definitely claim if townie, I'd much rather lose a vig than a watcher/tracker/cop.everywhere116 wrote:No. I don't want more people killed, but I don't think we're going to get the vig to claim nor should we even want a townie vig to claim without a doctor or any compelling reason to believe that the vig is scum. I think discussing the possibility is fine, but actively hunting for him is too risky.
Anyway the main point is that removal of the vig gives us an extra day compared with removal of standard mafia. If we lynch blue today then it is MYLO and we will likely have straight up counter claims tomorrow aka a coin toss.