Name that movie from the screenshot!

Stopper · Post by **Stopper** » Sun Sep 30, 2007 2:39 am

This might give it away:

Minister Masket · Post by **Minister Masket** » Sun Sep 30, 2007 5:02 am

It hasn't.

Sackett58 · Post by **Sackett58** » Sun Sep 30, 2007 10:23 am

Stopper wrote:This might give it away:

No, I'm still admiring the lady at the gate.

ga7 · Post by **ga7** » Sun Sep 30, 2007 10:28 am

Carmen?

Stopper · Post by **Stopper** » Sun Sep 30, 2007 10:48 am

ga7 wrote:Carmen?

Of course! If anyone was going to get it, it had to be you.

ga7 · Post by **ga7** » Sun Sep 30, 2007 11:07 am

Haha can't say I remember the movie though but the hint was enough

(couldn't find bigger pics, should still be recognizable...)

Tripitaka · Post by **Tripitaka** » Sun Sep 30, 2007 1:14 pm

You reckon!?

ga7 · Post by **ga7** » Sun Sep 30, 2007 2:43 pm

If you watched the movie and it left you any tiny impression, yes

Alright, second one then:

ga7 · Post by **ga7** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:46 am

Last big hint before giving up

1993 flick where Richard Gere plays a manic depressive.

Stopper · Post by **Stopper** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 12:09 pm

Erm, errr, is iiit...Mr Jones?

I hope it is, because going through Richard Gere films on imdb makes me feel dirty.

ga7 · Post by **ga7** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 1:12 pm

Your go.

sam_levi_11 · Post by **sam_levi_11** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 1:23 pm

lol stopper

Stopper · Post by **Stopper** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 2:01 pm

vtmarik · Post by **vtmarik** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 2:11 pm

Mr. Bean Gets Cast in a Cronenberg Flick?

Tripitaka · Post by **Tripitaka** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 2:12 pm

Shallow Grave - class movie!

Tripitaka · Post by **Tripitaka** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 2:48 pm

Ok, if you can prise your eyes away from them for a moment, perhaps one of you guys can tell me what film this shot is from:

Sackett58 · Post by **Sackett58** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 3:40 pm

[quote="Tripitaka"]Ok, if you can prise your eyes away from them for a moment, perhaps one of you guys can tell me what film this shot is from:

[
/quote]

Ah AH AH

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 3:53 pm

I don't know, but I hope I can get it off of netflix!

Tripitaka · Post by **Tripitaka** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 4:55 pm

You were obviously so distracted by the picture Sackett, that you couldn't even quote me properly!

And yes Anark, I'm sure you can rent it from all good stores!

Sackett58 · Post by **Sackett58** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 6:18 pm

Tripitaka wrote:You were obviously so distracted by the picture Sackett, that you couldn't even quote me properly!

And yes Anark, I'm sure you can rent it from all good stores!

We are no longer in Kansas Toto.

heavycola · Post by **heavycola** » Tue Oct 02, 2007 3:25 am

Is it Irreversible? Looks like Monica Belluci in that dress. Having said that there is plenty in that movie that i don't want re-seared on my brain...

Tripitaka · Post by **Tripitaka** » Tue Oct 02, 2007 8:14 am

heavycola wrote:Is it Irreversible? Looks like Monica Belluci in that dress. Having said that there is plenty in that movie that i don't want re-seared on my brain...

Yes, you're right, it is Irreversible - not the easiest of films to watch I grant you, what with the opening titles, the dizzying camera angles and the relentlessly pounding, nauseating low-frequency noise playing over the whole of the ultra-violent club scene..and all this before you even get to the fate of poor Ms Belucci's character! - little wonder then that according to Newsweek magazine this was the "most walked-out-of movie of the year" (2002). But having said all that, if you do make it to the penultimate scene, you are rewarded with a glimpse of true love and intimacy, played out as only a real-life couple could, which for me, puts the whole of the film into context and makes this one of the most powerful, thought-provoking movies, I have ever seen.

Ok, film review over - it's now your turn!

heavycola · Post by **heavycola** » Tue Oct 02, 2007 11:59 am

Tripitaka wrote:
heavycola wrote:Is it Irreversible? Looks like Monica Belluci in that dress. Having said that there is plenty in that movie that i don't want re-seared on my brain...
Yes, you're right, it is Irreversible - not the easiest of films to watch I grant you, what with the opening titles, the dizzying camera angles and the relentlessly pounding, nauseating low-frequency noise playing over the whole of the ultra-violent club scene..and all this before you even get to the fate of poor Ms Belucci's character! - little wonder then that according to Newsweek magazine this was the "most walked-out-of movie of the year" (2002). But having said all that, if you do make it to the penultimate scene, you are rewarded with a glimpse of true love and intimacy, played out as only a real-life couple could, which for me, puts the whole of the film into context and makes this one of the most powerful, thought-provoking movies, I have ever seen.

Ok, film review over - it's now your turn!

It is a hard movie to watch - in two particular places, as you know. But it's interesting you mention her fate; you learn that early on. And as a result, i found the film's ending all the more depressing for its beauty. We are all fucked by time and fate and there is nothing we can do about it. I did like the film very much, though. And Vincent Cassel is quite possibly the luckiest man alive.

Right:

Minister Masket · Post by **Minister Masket** » Tue Oct 02, 2007 12:52 pm

Image:
Contains field or crops, possibly American setting judging by the house. Includes Amish looking chaps, as well as a plague of locusts by the look of it.

Conclusion: NO FRIKKEN IDEA

Tripitaka · Post by **Tripitaka** » Tue Oct 02, 2007 5:56 pm

heavycola wrote:
Tripitaka wrote:...But having said all that, if you do make it to the penultimate scene, you are rewarded with a glimpse of true love and intimacy, played out as only a real-life couple could, which for me, puts the whole of the film into context and makes this one of the most powerful, thought-provoking movies, I have ever seen.
It is a hard movie to watch - in two particular places, as you know. But it's interesting you mention her fate; you learn that early on. And as a result, i found the film's ending all the more depressing for its beauty. We are all fucked by time and fate and there is nothing we can do about it. I did like the film very much, though. And Vincent Cassel is quite possibly the luckiest man alive.

I know what you mean about the ending. It is heartbreaking to see just how connected these two are, knowing that their world is about to be cruelly ripped apart. But for me it is strangely uplifting at the same time - I feel privileged to witness this couples love for each other, to share in their most intimate moments, moments that add poignancy to Marcus' impending turmoil and set the early scenes apart from the usual mindless violence we see so much of in cinema today.

And yes Mr. Cassel is indeed a very lucky man. His wife is absolutely stunning...why even I fancy her!