Page 29 of 65
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 9:19 pm
by william18
Vote Count
amazzony 4- Clive, Snorri1234, InkL0sed, baggins994
InkL0sed 1- spurgistan
suggs 2- /, InkL0sed
InkL0sed 2- suggs, timmytuttut
22 players, 12 to lynch[/quote]
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 9:36 pm
by kalishnikov
Unvote, vote: Suggs He was an SK the last time I had a hand in lynching him, let's see what he's got this game.
My reading up on game info was rudely interrupted, damn work, so I've still gotta finish so I've got nothing to report on that front until I've completed.
Oh and Koesen, I got you.
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 2:17 am
by KiwiTaker
Vote suggs
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 2:38 am
by diddle
Vote Suggs
I think he's trying to shift attention away from him, and I also think it backfired.
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 3:10 am
by Kernal_Kronic
I've had a bad felling about suggs all the time, i just hope he's not a jester
Vote suggs
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 4:01 am
by suggs
Nah I'm a tracker.
I found out INKL0SED killed Sam Levi.
Didnt say what role he was, just that he killed Sam.
Why did You kill Sam, Inklosed?
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 5:20 am
by Kernal_Kronic
suggs wrote:Nah I'm a tracker.
I found out INKL0SED killed Sam Levi.
Didnt say what role he was, just that he killed Sam.
Why did You kill Sam, Inklosed?
I thought kiwi was the tracker & you were a role blocker (kiwi said you visited cena on the night he was blocked)
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 6:07 am
by mandyb
In a game this size, is it possible there is more than one tracker?
If Inklosed did kill Sam, it's possible he is either scum or vigilante.
I think we need to know why he killed Sam.
I would like to hear more from Inklosed and his role/reason in Sams kill.
Amazzony hasn't posted much recently despite having a fair few votes against her - a little FOS there...
How long have we got left to vote?
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 6:25 am
by militant
Ditto, i am not going to vote yet, but i would also like to hear from Inklosed please
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 7:41 am
by william18
Vote Count
amazzony 3- Clive, Snorri1234, baggins994
InkL0sed 1- spurgistan
suggs 6- /, InkL0sed, kernal kronic, diddle, kiwitaker, kalishnikov
InkL0sed 3- suggs, timmytuttut, *secret*
22 players, 12 to lynch
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 7:59 am
by william18
Should I post pic's of the charecters that died?
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 8:19 am
by william18
Tali:
She is quarian who left the Flotilla to go on her pilgramage.
Garrus Vakarian:

He is a hotheaded C-sec investigator/cop. Due to his hot-headedness the only reason he's not fired is because he's one of the best they have.
Askley Williams:
She had her whole unit wiped out by Geth on Eden Prime. She joined Shepard there because she was one of the last humans their who survived the attack.
I can't find a pic of harkin but if you play the game you now what he look like.
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 9:14 am
by Koesen
suggs wrote:Nah I'm a tracker.
I found out INKL0SED killed Sam Levi.
Didnt say what role he was, just that he killed Sam.
Why did You kill Sam, Inklosed?
And we have a winner.
Trackers aren't told what their targets do, just where they go. Three possibilities:
1. You're a liar
2. William fundamentally changed the tracker role for this game
3. You're a jester (and a liar)
My money is on #1.
Unvote. Vote Suggs.
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 9:16 am
by william18
Koesen wrote:suggs wrote:Nah I'm a tracker.
I found out INKL0SED killed Sam Levi.
Didnt say what role he was, just that he killed Sam.
Why did You kill Sam, Inklosed?
And we have a winner.
Trackers aren't told what their targets do, just where they go. Three possibilities:
1. You're a liar
2. William fundamentally changed the tracker role for this game
3. You're a jester (and a liar)
My money is on #1.
Unvote. Vote Suggs.
Just to tell you all, I will never put a jester in games this big.
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 9:18 am
by Koesen
You just went up a notch in my book
Kalishnikov: thank you, Sir
Clive: just because we're going after suggs now, doesn't mean you don't have any explaining to do.
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:08 am
by suggs
Koesen wrote:suggs wrote:Nah I'm a tracker.
I found out INKL0SED killed Sam Levi.
Didnt say what role he was, just that he killed Sam.
Why did You kill Sam, Inklosed?
And we have a winner.
Trackers aren't told what their targets do, just where they go. Three possibilities:
1. You're a liar
2. William fundamentally changed the tracker role for this game
3. You're a jester (and a liar)
My money is on #1.
Unvote. Vote Suggs.
A false trichotomy old boy.
There are more than three options. There is (at least-but will skip the pseudo-ontological/epistemological digression) a fourth option:
I'M AN INCOMPETENT IDIOT.
I just got a PM from William to remind me that i am not a tracker, but part of a neighbour hood watch. (There are more people in this neighbour hood watch, butobvioulsy i dont want to "out" them).
I assumed the two things are the same-i guess they are not (never been a tracker before, or completed a game in which there is a tracker).
Anyway, I can "target" someone every night. I only find out something if someone is killed ( i can also Pm the oher people in the Watch at night, so we dont target the same person).
So i targeted Sam (it seemed pretty clear that he was going to get into trouble) and found out that Inklosed killed him.
In my defence, i think "targeting" and "tracking" sound somewhat similar, buti guess they are quite defence.
Anyway, we need to know why Inklosed killed Sam. Pro town bodge or scum?
Sorry for confusion.
ps in another mafia game where i made a mistake ( I was a vanilla townie, but was acting like a prick for a laugh) the verdict was : "Ah, he is backtracking now, he MUST be guilty."
Don't make the same mistake here.
(I'll give you the link to the Mafia Scum game if you want).
Plus, there seemed to be a rather unintelligent assumption that the more you talk, and defend yourself, the guiltier you are.
Because i delight in the unorthodox and abhor the cliche, i would just say "Bollocks to that"-I'll keep talking and digging my own grave until i'm lynched, just for the puerile pleasure of me being right, and you being wrong

Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:28 am
by browng-08
Can't say no to that.

Except I still haven't been convinced.
vote suggs
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 10:32 am
by baggins994
unvote vote suggs i like him but all evidence is against him
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:11 am
by Koesen
suggs wrote:a lot of creative and interesting stuff
Congratulations on a quality defense. Unfortunately, while I believe you have a shining scum future ahead of you in other games and although I thoroughly enjoy being tempted to believe something I've never heard before, I think you are making it all up.
To me, the thought of having an entire protown network of watchers who, if they choose the right target, are given the identity of the killers, sounds rather overpowered. Especially since I'm here already, and though my role differs from what you claim in a few fundamental ways, it still comes a little too close to imagine that william would put both your roles and mine in the same game.
You may of course share with me whatever your neighbourhood network picked up in night one. I'm sure you can produce a fascinating story

Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:15 am
by Koesen
Another question, so we can verify your story while you're sizzling on the electric chair: what is your exact role name? And your character name?
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:29 am
by william18
Vote Count
amazzony 2- Clive, Snorri1234,
InkL0sed 1- spurgistan
suggs 8- /, InkL0sed, kernal kronic, diddle, kiwitaker, kalishnikov, baggins994, browng-08
InkL0sed 3- suggs, timmytuttut, *secret*
22 players, 12 to lynch
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:30 am
by william18
Should I post all the pics on the first page for future reference?
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:30 am
by Clive
Koesen wrote:You just went up a notch in my book
Kalishnikov: thank you, Sir
Clive: just because we're going after suggs now, doesn't mean you don't have any explaining to do.
What?
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:32 am
by Koesen
Clive wrote:Koesen wrote:You just went up a notch in my book
Kalishnikov: thank you, Sir
Clive: just because we're going after suggs now, doesn't mean you don't have any explaining to do.
What?
You know what. Why did you kill Muy_Thaiguy?
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:32 am
by kalishnikov
Koesen wrote:suggs wrote:a lot of creative and interesting stuff
Congratulations on a quality defense. Unfortunately, while I believe you have a shining scum future ahead of you in other games and although I thoroughly enjoy being tempted to believe something I've never heard before, I think you are making it all up.
To me, the thought of having an entire protown network of watchers who, if they choose the right target, are given the identity of the killers, sounds rather overpowered. Especially since I'm here already, and though my role differs from what you claim in a few fundamental ways, it still comes a little too close to imagine that william would put both your roles and mine in the same game.
You may of course share with me whatever your neighbourhood network picked up in night one. I'm sure you can produce a fascinating story

Well said Koesen and almost my exact thoughts.
The Neighborhood watch was an excellent claim followed with a great description and defense however knowing a few of the roles already out there (myself, Koesen, and at least 2 pro-town trackers already) the role seems too overpowered to be true, especially in a game like this with power roles abundant. Also that claim would imply that the town has the ability to know one another/communicate and we do not have that ability.
I've said it before and I'll say it again: Suggs is gonna be a great scum player when he gets a little more experience.