Moderator: Community Team
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
Will Sweden ever give Finland back to Russia?natty_dread wrote:Will Russia ever give Karelia back to Finland?
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
saxitoxin wrote:Will Sweden ever give Finland back to Russia?natty_dread wrote:Will Russia ever give Karelia back to Finland?
LOL - just teasing Natty!![]()
*tickle tickle*
*Saxi tickles Natty*
Oh so it's a tickle war now?saxitoxin wrote:Will Sweden ever give Finland back to Russia?natty_dread wrote:Will Russia ever give Karelia back to Finland?
LOL - just teasing Natty!![]()
*tickle tickle*
*Saxi tickles Natty*


This is a tough one to answer, as neither of them were all that good for Russia, but which was better? I would say Lenin, because he was much more flexible than Stalin and he did not rely so heavily on state terror to get his way. So Lenin would compromise and listen to popular discontent, and example of that being the NEP. Stalin on the other hand would create mass approval by simply killing anyone who disagreed or criticised a course of action. I believe the extent of the Stalinist terror was overall more damaging than the short term benefits they generated.naxus wrote:In your opinion who was the better leader for Russia? Stalin or lenin?
It was a pretty similar situation to our most recent financial crisis actually. I don't know all the nitty gritty details but in general what happened was the Asian financial crisis caused foreign investment and lending to dry up. That would be bad enough but the crisis cause allot of Russia's customers to stop buying so Russia got hit with a pretty severe recession. The Government already faced with all the Soviet debt, the new debt they had picked up after the fall and collapsing tax revenue due to the recession and unable to get new loans ended up just printing money which of coursed caused the Rubble to go into hyperinflation. They also took some seriously drastic measures to balance their budget, they cut government services severely(all government services) and simply stopped paying their debts eventually things stabilized and the Russian government became very spend thrifty as a result of the 90's experience. Now they have little or no government debt and large currency reserves, though the current recession hit Russia pretty hard too so that may be different now I'm not sure.Phatscotty wrote:Why did the Ruble Crash in the 90's?
I personally cannot stand Dima Bilan and his type of music. So I hate all his songs.saxitoxin wrote:Guy, where are you in the RF, geographically speaking? You been to Perm on a visit at all? What oddities did you observe there, if any?Dako wrote:I am too lazy to read the whole thread so I will just keep the pace from now on.
What's your FAV Dima Bilan song? (that's a Q for either you or PWN)
Guy and/or PWN: Have you seen this video of the Choir of the Moscow Military District? This is one reason I love Russians!![]()
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7RD5ONjv8M
Thank you. One follow up question please. What could the Russians have done to prevent that crisis? What could the people have done, the media, individuals, to prevent/prepare/survive that crisis.Baron Von PWN wrote:It was a pretty similar situation to our most recent financial crisis actually. I don't know all the nitty gritty details but in general what happened was the Asian financial crisis caused foreign investment and lending to dry up. That would be bad enough but the crisis cause allot of Russia's customers to stop buying so Russia got hit with a pretty severe recession. The Government already faced with all the Soviet debt, the new debt they had picked up after the fall and collapsing tax revenue due to the recession and unable to get new loans ended up just printing money which of coursed caused the Rubble to go into hyperinflation. They also took some seriously drastic measures to balance their budget, they cut government services severely(all government services) and simply stopped paying their debts eventually things stabilized and the Russian government became very spend thrifty as a result of the 90's experience. Now they have little or no government debt and large currency reserves, though the current recession hit Russia pretty hard too so that may be different now I'm not sure.Phatscotty wrote:
Why did the Ruble Crash in the 90's?
Phatscotty; I see you as a white forces sympathizer, fortunately for you you were smart enough no to be open about it, you hate the Stalinist regime and dream of escaping the Soviet union. You must constantly be on guard that you don't let slip your feelings about the regime and are always keeping your eyes open for an opportunity to emigrate. Chances of survival till Khrushchev; moderate.
Phatscotty wrote:
Thank you. One follow up question please. What could the Russians have done to prevent that crisis? What could the people have done, the media, individuals, to prevent/prepare/survive that crisis.
Stalinist Nirvana....4th in the bread line with a slight drizzle
TheSaxlad wrote:The Dice suck a lot of the time.
And if they dont suck then they blow.
Hmm I've never heard that. I do know that while Stalin was the boss he would pressure scientists to find certain results. He was also susceptible to taking favorites in terms of Scientists sometimes to disastrous results. There was one guy who claimed he could make vegetables and plants grow in any climate, Stalin of course loved this idea so he gave him all kinds of funding, anyone who disagreed with or criticized the research was suppressed.Joodoo wrote:Is it true that the Soviet government discouraged people from studying/researching about biology?
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
This was definitely true during the late Soviet Union(when they started allowing western tourists in) and early 90's. In general a westerner could get some awesome deals trading almost any western consumer product. This isn't really true anymore though the market is open enough that Russians have easy access to jeans(though they are much more expensive here) and consumer goods are now of equivalent quality.KoolBak wrote:25 years ago, my girlfriend at the time visited Russia during a school exchange thing.....she indicated the natives were crazy about American stuff like Levis, sneakers, t-shirts and odds and ends....she traded some clothes for some very cool Russian made stuff - is this true now? Do you think it was true then or was that a story she made up to explain her loss of clothing while there? lol
Real question though - thanks
Sort-of almost nobody other than State security had guns, so the average citizen wouldn't be doing much shooting.muy_thaiguy wrote:Is it true; "in Soviet Russia, you don't shoot gun, gun shoot you?"
TheSaxlad wrote:The Dice suck a lot of the time.
And if they dont suck then they blow.
As an absolute monarchy? not very long, the modern era was showing the tsarist system could not keep up. There was widespread desire for reform and the Tsar was a bungler something would have come up to at the very least force political reform. Its very difficult to imagine the Tsarist system withstanding the pressures of nationalism. This is all what if history though so everything is just a wild guess.Joodoo wrote:How much longer do you think the Russian Empire would last if it didn't involve itself in World War I?
Lenin mass murdered for the sake of gaining political power. Stalin mass murdered to create more power. In a way I see no difference. I will give you this though, Stalin was more blood thirsty and I believe he derived pleasure from murder wheras Lenin rationalized it more for the sake of political expediency. Also, Lenin did not engage in genocide like Stalin did.Baron Von PWN wrote:This is a tough one to answer, as neither of them were all that good for Russia, but which was better? I would say Lenin, because he was much more flexible than Stalin and he did not rely so heavily on state terror to get his way. So Lenin would compromise and listen to popular discontent, and example of that being the NEP. Stalin on the other hand would create mass approval by simply killing anyone who disagreed or criticised a course of action. I believe the extent of the Stalinist terror was overall more damaging than the short term benefits they generated.naxus wrote:In your opinion who was the better leader for Russia? Stalin or lenin?
He's so much more talented and so much hotter than J-Bieb.Baron Von PWN wrote: I personally cannot stand Dima Bilan and his type of music. So I hate all his songs.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
Well sure, but I hate J-beib too. I admit he has signing ability and so on, it is simply completely against my tastes.saxitoxin wrote:He's so much more talented and so much hotter than J-Bieb.Baron Von PWN wrote: I personally cannot stand Dima Bilan and his type of music. So I hate all his songs.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7TMpWKNKX_w
It's just weird that, with all his success, he's never been able to afford anything other than a white sleeveless t-shirt.
ಠ_ಠPedronicus wrote:Is it true that even after Russia gave back all those countries that end with a Stan or beckystan, it's still bigger than Northern Ireland?
TheSaxlad wrote:The Dice suck a lot of the time.
And if they dont suck then they blow.
Canada (a rounded 10 million Km) is a bit less than two thirds the size of Russia (a Rounded 17 million km). Before looking it up I would have guessed Canada was about half the size of Russia.2dimes wrote:How does it compare in size to Canader?
I thin they will continue to improve. They have already largely resolved their previous disagreements(had to do with the border which they have demarcated). They have been engaging in military co-operation through the SCO and Russia has resources China needs for industry and they are both eager for trade .Joodoo wrote:What's your view on future Sino-Russian relations?
A cool trip would be to land in Moscow spend a day or two there, take the Transiberian and visit the pacific coast of Russia. The region is still pretty wild so I hope you like wilderness tourism. You'll definitely want to get a guide book if you ever end going.2dimes wrote:Ok I really want to go see the north east pacific coast of Ruskiland in the summer. I also want to ride that train. I should wait until after I take my Dad to Scotland. I need $7billion. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amur_Yakutsk_Mainline