Moderator: Community Team

safariguy5 wrote:Sorry, doesn't a bandwagon help give us information? The two things are mutually exclusive freezie.

Isn't that basically what all my games are?freezie wrote:okes, and purely voting for nonesense reasons.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.

x3 I like your rationale ;3freezie wrote:If you ever stop modding this, then acess my last wish: lynch ga7 no matter what
Then at least this game won't die in vain.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
To me this sounds like "We need to take a chance so I'll wagon" but since he seems conscious the very act of wagonning is scummy he complains about it (and ridiculously pretends not to be doing it).Victor Sullivan wrote:I know everyone's a coward cuz they don't want people to think their bandwagoning, so I will unvote and vote lalaland because we need some info. I'm not BWing, I just think we need some info to go off of for Day 1.
There's plenty of days 1 that saw a scum lynched since I started there, but with this kind of mentality it's gonna be toughfreezie wrote: You're right, we need some infos. But we ALL know we won't get any infos on day one. Unless someone fucks up real bad, which I never seen happen.
Basically while I see how you could read that statement and see 0 sense I disagree that it's done in a way to prevent arousing suspicion, when it's precisely bitching about people not wagonning. So I think your argument is weak, and my vote was a half joking onepmchugh wrote: Personally I see this as you trying to find an excuse to bandwaggon without arousing suspicion, which is in itself suspicious. unvote vote sully
Anarkistsdream wrote:If you guys can't tell that Doom is being forced to post this drivel, you are fools...
Mr. Squirrel wrote:One fool reporting for duty!pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
Your vote was a joke (in more than one wayga7 wrote:Basically while I see how you could read that statement and see 0 sense I disagree that it's done in a way to prevent arousing suspicion, when it's precisely bitching about people not wagonning. So I think your argument is weak, and my vote was a half joking onepmchugh wrote: Personally I see this as you trying to find an excuse to bandwaggon without arousing suspicion, which is in itself suspicious. unvote vote sullyIf as you say he was "keeping us happy" he wouldn't have voted, especially after saying that.
So in summary, Freezie you forgot how to play and Pmc I suspect you're scum because you're fishily going with a weak argument.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Pushing on small arguments is one thing, but forcing a claim already? Thats pretty extreme. Its early days yet and there is a lot more to come from this day.edocsil wrote:So if we want info we could just push Sully to L-1 or 2 and see what he has to say. I don't think he is scum, he usually acts like this even when town. I do however thing we should push him a bit to see what he has to say for himself. Also I would say fakeclaims might be difficult in this game, not an environment any of us are particularly familiar with.
Thoughts?
And can we get a vote tally? Would hate for an accidental hammer.
lalaland wrote:This is what I love about Spamalot... you click on a title to a thread, and you have no idea what you'll find inside...
Come on colton, don't be skimming, you know better than that.colton24 wrote:What the Frenchie(Grins) said

Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Agreed, apart from sarif the last few posts have added nothing. Colton, care to state some reasons as to your thoguhts or have any original input?Fircoal wrote:All you scummies should POST!!!!!
edocsil wrote: And can we get a vote tally? Would hate for an accidental hammer.

lalaland wrote:This is what I love about Spamalot... you click on a title to a thread, and you have no idea what you'll find inside...
Isn't this what you would call "hypocracy"?duday53 wrote:Point is, jumping from bw to bw is scummy, however people shouldn't be scared to be the 3rd, 4th, or 5th vote on somebody if there is a somewhat legit reason.
Anyways, random vote safariguy
Right now all I agree with is bandwagoning gives us info. Moving on...pmchugh wrote:Agreed, apart from sarif the last few posts have added nothing. Colton, care to state some reasons as to your thoguhts or have any original input?Fircoal wrote:All you scummies should POST!!!!!
Mr. Squirrel wrote:One fool reporting for duty!pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
Only takes 7 to lynch, and two players have 3 votes... 2 more votes for either and they would be getting mighty close to a lynch. There are some players here are a bit new, and a mistake would get them killed day 2. Easily preventable with a vote tally.freezie wrote:edocsil wrote: And can we get a vote tally? Would hate for an accidental hammer.
Did you skipped the entire conversation to not even know we were far from a hammer, or did you just not pay attention?
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Mr. Squirrel wrote:One fool reporting for duty!pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Mr. Squirrel wrote:One fool reporting for duty!pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
Mr. Squirrel wrote:One fool reporting for duty!pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed