Think? I don't think. What does think mean?s.xkitten wrote:well...what do you think?
Moderator: Community Team
Think? I don't think. What does think mean?s.xkitten wrote:well...what do you think?
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
same heres.xkitten wrote:well...thats good...i love not having townies die
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Bullshit on this post., You can't assume shit just because someone can't get to their computer fast enough. Many of us are in different timezones and have other problems or things going on... Such as my band had a gig last night.Aimless wrote:So, apparently the wolves were too busy chasing their own tail to kill someone. Either that, or this is all an elaborate ruse by Fircoal to make us think he's not a wolf by claiming to, in fact, be one.
My suspicion is the former. So, I suggest we set an elaborate trap for our friend the wolfman - since he's obviously occupied elsewhere at the moment, perhaps if we all rush into the town square and take a quick roll call, we'll figure out who's missing.
In other words, last one to post has doggy breath.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
XenHu wrote: JESUS CHRIST! ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR FUCKING MIND?!![]()
*ahem*
That is all.
How would you know what the wolves were doing?So, apparently the wolves were too busy chasing their own tail to kill someone.
It's not, I was just joking around.Either that, or this is all an elaborate ruse by Fircoal to make us think he's not a wolf by claiming to, in fact, be one.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Normally, I'd agree with this. However, we just had a rather long night, with no kill at the end. I'm tempted to think that the time-limit expired for the wolves. Which means accusing deadwood is a very practical survival tactic under the conditions.As for aimless you should not accuse deadwood. The mod should replace it.
I dont get it. You put me on your list because I havnt posted yet,but then you practically FOS me because I asked a question during the game which means I shouldnt be on the first list to begin with?Aimless wrote:By the way, the list of the yet-to-be-heard-from :
Minkish; Machiavelli; pyro55; Balsiefen; everywhere116; what,me worry?
what,me worry? and Balsiefen posted during the night (including a "How long until night?" post from wmw), but I'm not sure I should count that.
The same person who should get a job/girlfriend/sport/life instead of reading into peoples statements.Aimless wrote:First, my list was of people who hadn't posted yet during the day.
Second, I made a specific point to mention those who did post during the night, along with the comment that I wasn't sure whether or not to count them on the list.
As for the comment regarding your night post, it was true, was it not? I didn't FOS you; but, if you feel that your comment was suspicious, who am I to deny a guilty conscience?
so in the first part of your quote, you said Umm hello, which I interpret as you trying to come across sarcastic, but then you throw in the hello and neither are words connected....... ONLY TRUE MAFIA WOULD DO THAT!Aimless wrote:Ummm. Hello.
second quote, You must be hinting that we should look into everyones statement. I see this as you trying to be too helpful which must mean......YOU ARE MAFIA!!!!Aimless wrote:The entire point of this game is to read things into people's statements.
Third quote, you quote me on how you LOVED my ad hominem which must mean you are trying to now get on my good side which is a trick only, MAFIA WOULD USE!!!!! BTW, There was no point in addressing your accusation due to the fact that it was a valid question that you seem intent on trying to grill me on ( I have joking about you being mafia thus far, but in all seriousness, that part smells of mafia)Aimless wrote:By the way, nice ad hominem.
Now it seems in your last quote, you really wanted to take the cake! Not only did you already did you compliment my "ad hominem", but then you felt the need to be repetitive by explaining what it is, but instead presenting it like they were two separate points. NICE ONE.And I cant imply what you have assumed. BTW, you put "it" at the beginning of your sentence which tells me you were nervous while writing this, nervous not to give away your identity as MAFIA!!!!!!Aimless wrote:It take it that since you've devolved into implied insults, you don't have any actual defense?