Moderator: Clan Directors


what youre missing here is that your main problem IS the 3 seedViperOverLord wrote:That's my point. It was based on last year, but it didn't take into account serious upgrades. But, this is a first year set-up and the leagues will sort it out in the long run. I think it seriously inhibited our shot at premier league though with glitches like that; and could even push us back into a worse league.freakns wrote:well, maybe they improved?
seeding were taken from last clan league, so i think its fair. last year they werent that good, so they got worse seeding... also, bunch of them being brigs and colonels doesnt necessary mean they are top team players. maybe they are good, maybe they arent... dunno. will see when we played them
You don't want you 5 seed being more like a 3 seed or it's gonna be so much more tougher.

Well MM are even in F400 seeded belove MD. I think that each group are good balanced, if they have brigadiers and colonels why they not move up in F400?ViperOverLord wrote:That's my point. It was based on last year, but it didn't take into account serious upgrades. But, this is a first year set-up and the leagues will sort it out in the long run. I think it seriously inhibited our shot at premier league though with glitches like that; and could even push us back into a worse league.freakns wrote:well, maybe they improved?
seeding were taken from last clan league, so i think its fair. last year they werent that good, so they got worse seeding... also, bunch of them being brigs and colonels doesnt necessary mean they are top team players. maybe they are good, maybe they arent... dunno. will see when we played them
You don't want you 5 seed being more like a 3 seed or it's gonna be so much more tougher.
I don't buy into the ideal, that flat rate is about fostering luck. Playing flat rate requires a certain sort of strategy just like no spoils. I think escalating is closer to luck, b/c you can be dominating and then a game can turn on a dime much easier. Lucky turn-ins factor much more in that case. But to me saying flat rate is a matter of luck is almost akin to saying dice is a matter of luck. Yes there's luck involved, but you can never take an element of luck out of the game. I may be in the minority with my viewpoint, but that is how I see it.freakns wrote:what youre missing here is that your main problem IS the 3 seedViperOverLord wrote:That's my point. It was based on last year, but it didn't take into account serious upgrades. But, this is a first year set-up and the leagues will sort it out in the long run. I think it seriously inhibited our shot at premier league though with glitches like that; and could even push us back into a worse league.freakns wrote:well, maybe they improved?
seeding were taken from last clan league, so i think its fair. last year they werent that good, so they got worse seeding... also, bunch of them being brigs and colonels doesnt necessary mean they are top team players. maybe they are good, maybe they arent... dunno. will see when we played them
You don't want you 5 seed being more like a 3 seed or it's gonna be so much more tougher.
Q5 group proves to be very solid... i think even AQOH have chance for decent result(well, based on their performance against us). you should be happy for it, its more fun this way!
also, you are unsure about seeding, while out of 8 home games you play 7 flat rate games?! thats just playing for lucky sets...

I disagree. If anything, flat can help weather the bad luck of going 2nd, getting a bonus down, using it to target a player quickly, building in certain areas to prevent someone from carding and smothering much like in no spoils, only quicker. And in that regard, it's not always about getting an advantage as much as preventing another team from resting back and cheesing if they start with an advantage. I think players who are used to playing no spoils and keying in on a weak link get their ire up when they actually have to deal with the skill of flat. I've seen it happen plenty. Plenty of crying and dismissing the flat luck when they just got beat and we'ren't so dominant after all. You pretend that flat makes a game about luck and I'm here to tell you otherwise. Flat is a skillset like any other setting. It may not be as potent as other settings in your mind's eye. But it requires strategy.freakns wrote:you may be in minority or majority, doesnt matter, simple statistic will tell you flat is about luck much more then esc. yes, this is dice based game so luck will be included no matter what map/settings you chose, but every skill player will try to find a way to decrees element of luck. this is why you have ppl who are more skilled in unlimited settings, you have players who are more skilled in adj, you have ppl who are more skilled in esc, and players who are more skilled in no spoils. but since i have played this game i have never, ever heard about someone being skilled in flat rate. i do use flat rate too, but only in special occasions, not in a million years i would use it on standard map.
as for other thing, you and i are completely different in this regard... when i saw bunch of colonels/brigadiers, i say "woot, woot, more free points!!!", not "holly crap, these guys know how to play". anyhow, we are up against them next round, ill get a chance to have some of those free points for myself, so dont take too much out of them
For the Labels, could you perhaps do a search for all game labels with "1"? As a stopgap measure.qwert wrote:well i realised that add link will be very hard,because many people dont put correct labels, right now i have these combinations
Correct label are
- [R1]
wrong
- [R1 ]
-(RD1)
-(Rd1)
-- [R1]
- Round 4
- [RD4]
- RD 1
- Round 2
- 2013 [CL5][QG4]-R4
---------------------------
its look that for Qualification phase i will not add links, for now only QG5 are totaly correct ,probably because benga very good observe all games ,and he even put links in third post, so maybe all other DD need to do same like benga did.
i dont have problems to find games(use game finder),, but you can not add links here ,where many are not same. We speak in first rounds, and i though that all DD get instructions to notify all clan representatives, but its look that they not do that, or maybe i dont know.Leehar wrote:Hey, no need to give all the credit to benga![]()
It could just be that they all did it right because I had to recreate all their games for the first batch
They learnt their lesson faster than the others![]()
For the Labels, could you perhaps do a search for all game labels with "1"? As a stopgap measure.qwert wrote:well i realised that add link will be very hard,because many people dont put correct labels, right now i have these combinations
Correct label are
- [R1]
wrong
- [R1 ]
-(RD1)
-(Rd1)
-- [R1]
- Round 4
- [RD4]
- RD 1
- Round 2
- 2013 [CL5][QG4]-R4
---------------------------
its look that for Qualification phase i will not add links, for now only QG5 are totaly correct ,probably because benga very good observe all games ,and he even put links in third post, so maybe all other DD need to do same like benga did.
Except for that last lengthy one, it should be able to retrieve all the other games.
We should send this post of yours as a pm to all clan contacts tho. Need to get everyone on the same page
benga wrote:Lee is right, but also wrong
qwert wants to give direct links to games, and this can't been done like that, as far as I know
qwert wrote:i dont have problems to find games(use game finder),, but you can not add links here ,where many are not same. We speak in first rounds, and i though that all DD get instructions to notify all clan representatives, but its look that they not do that, or maybe i dont know.Leehar wrote:Hey, no need to give all the credit to benga![]()
It could just be that they all did it right because I had to recreate all their games for the first batch
They learnt their lesson faster than the others![]()
For the Labels, could you perhaps do a search for all game labels with "1"? As a stopgap measure.qwert wrote:well i realised that add link will be very hard,because many people dont put correct labels, right now i have these combinations
Correct label are
- [R1]
wrong
- [R1 ]
-(RD1)
-(Rd1)
-- [R1]
- Round 4
- [RD4]
- RD 1
- Round 2
- 2013 [CL5][QG4]-R4
---------------------------
its look that for Qualification phase i will not add links, for now only QG5 are totaly correct ,probably because benga very good observe all games ,and he even put links in third post, so maybe all other DD need to do same like benga did.
Except for that last lengthy one, it should be able to retrieve all the other games.
We should send this post of yours as a pm to all clan contacts tho. Need to get everyone on the same page
Its look that DD need every round to send instructions on how labels need to use.
Instead [R4] ,one clan use - 2013 [CL5][QG4]- 2013 [CL5][QG4]-R4 ,
Giving me privileges, mine job to fast find games in game finder are much easier,, but for now,i can not add links, because its will be so many links .
for example these its only correct link to round 1,in entire QG(its benga department)
round 1 http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?s ... so=&page=1
now in other groups, for round 1 i need to have 2, and more links.


expected... TLW beating Empire is the biggest one so far... then you guys beating AOC... maybe tie between PIG and TOFUIcePack wrote:Not to many surprises here yet.


TLW > EMP isnt a huge surprise when you consider they picked all random games, and it's only 8. Almost any clan can upset somebody in a small match under those conditions.freakns wrote:expected... TLW beating Empire is the biggest one so far... then you guys beating AOC... maybe tie between PIG and TOFUIcePack wrote:Not to many surprises here yet.
i think by the end we will see 12 strongest teams advancing. TOFU, PIG, EMP, MYTH, AFOS, ID, AOC, FALL, IA, OTP, KORT, OSA... maybe FOED instead of ID, LOW instead of FALL.

I'm not surprised either, since as you say, in eight games anyone can upset anyone. Small sample size and all that.IcePack wrote:freakns wrote:expected... TLW beating Empire is the biggest one so far... then you guys beating AOC... maybe tie between PIG and TOFUIcePack wrote:Not to many surprises here yet.
i think by the end we will see 12 strongest teams advancing. TOFU, PIG, EMP, MYTH, AFOS, ID, AOC, FALL, IA, OTP, KORT, OSA... maybe FOED instead of ID, LOW instead of FALL.
I guess others might be surprised about us beating AOC.
Oh snap!! That cracked me up. Love you, angola and all that.angola wrote:I'm not surprised either, since as you say, in eight games anyone can upset anyone. Small sample size and all that.IcePack wrote:freakns wrote:expected... TLW beating Empire is the biggest one so far... then you guys beating AOC... maybe tie between PIG and TOFUIcePack wrote:Not to many surprises here yet.
i think by the end we will see 12 strongest teams advancing. TOFU, PIG, EMP, MYTH, AFOS, ID, AOC, FALL, IA, OTP, KORT, OSA... maybe FOED instead of ID, LOW instead of FALL.
I guess others might be surprised about us beating AOC.

Sounds like a predictor to warangola wrote:I'm not surprised either, since as you say, in eight games anyone can upset anyone. Small sample size and all that.IcePack wrote:freakns wrote:expected... TLW beating Empire is the biggest one so far... then you guys beating AOC... maybe tie between PIG and TOFUIcePack wrote:Not to many surprises here yet.
i think by the end we will see 12 strongest teams advancing. TOFU, PIG, EMP, MYTH, AFOS, ID, AOC, FALL, IA, OTP, KORT, OSA... maybe FOED instead of ID, LOW instead of FALL.
I guess others might be surprised about us beating AOC.



I think Fallen could be 12-4 as wellBruceswar wrote:After round 1 and 2 Kort will be 12-4. Lets go COWS!!


