I think that had more to do with being herbivorousnotyou2 wrote:Chimpanzees know murder is wrong, and they don't have organized religion.
Moderator: Community Team
I think that had more to do with being herbivorousnotyou2 wrote:Chimpanzees know murder is wrong, and they don't have organized religion.
Actually they are omnivores...Phatscotty wrote:I think that had more to do with being herbivorousnotyou2 wrote:Chimpanzees know murder is wrong, and they don't have organized religion.
straight to the ad-hominems, man?DJ Teflon wrote: You![]()
Everywhere, in varying degress, and wherever you live in the least degree.
You are the perfect example, and everything you say![]()
What are you comparing to anyhow, another part of your empire you have corrupted
![]()
you must have missed the part where i talked about "what most christians believe" in the third person. go back and read.DJ Teflon wrote:Who knows what they understand, unless we have been a chimp.
But, as they aren't inherently sinful, they are morally superior to humans and your god, according to your humans-are-evil-in-the image-of-god-doctrine.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
In general, the whole world, and probably chimpanzees, are spiritually superior to both of these shitholes.john9blue wrote:british superiority over the US
hrmmm, does that include 3rd world countries who cannot even produce enough food for themselves?DJ Teflon wrote:In general, the whole world, and probably chimpanzees, are spiritually superior to both of these shitholes.john9blue wrote:british superiority over the US
Then I would pity you less, and rejoice in the fact that, at least you have liberals, maybe they dont counteract the dark-side much, but the centre-right is a relief in comparison to the almost-facist-texan-rightwhat if i told you that i live in one of the most liberal cities in the US?
I would suggest we create a Dark Side vs Rebel Alliance tournament to provide further scientific evidence either waywhat if i told you that the scientifically proven odds of you being better at critical thinking than me are very, very small?Regardless, nuker's original point was that 'religion' prevents nuke-ing
DJ Teflon wrote:Regardless, nuker's original point was that 'religion' prevents nuke-ing.
Yet, where there is plenty of 'religion', exists the only case of nuking in human history, a predominantly dark-side belief of the human condition, a 4th world, no care for the sick, gangs and gun crime on the streets, and an economic and partly military empire.
Where would anyone go to achieve enlightenment? Not the UK, not the US.
![]()
Where would anyone go to live in a sharing community? Same answer.
And that's before we discuss the oil-usage conspiracy kills the planet, literally. If only the empire builders had been polytheists we would have a better chance of saving it. Sadly, the dark-side believers think there is no chance.
Phatscotty wrote:DJ Teflon wrote:Regardless, nuker's original point was that 'religion' prevents nuke-ing.
Yet, where there is plenty of 'religion', exists the only case of nuking in human history, a predominantly dark-side belief of the human condition, a 4th world, no care for the sick, gangs and gun crime on the streets, and an economic and partly military empire.
Where would anyone go to achieve enlightenment? Not the UK, not the US.
![]()
Where would anyone go to live in a sharing community? Same answer.
And that's before we discuss the oil-usage conspiracy kills the planet, literally. If only the empire builders had been polytheists we would have a better chance of saving it. Sadly, the dark-side believers think there is no chance.
First of all, is that really the definition of enlightenment? Free health care and no gangs??? Sounds more like the definition of Socialism with a police state.
How old are you? Your connection that dropping a nuclear bomb based on religion is ridiculous. I think it had a little more to do with being sneak attacked at Pearl Harbor.....don't you?
No gangs and free health care correlates with the ability to become enlightened. There was no logical explanation that one leads to the other, but thanks for pointing out the correlation: try being enlightened with a bullet in your head in a gutter.Phatscotty wrote:First of all, is that really the definition of enlightenment? Free health care and no gangs??? Sounds more like the definition of Socialism with a police state.
Nuker was the one who claimed that 'religion' prevents nuke-ing - address your concern to him.Phatscotty wrote:How old are you? Your connection that dropping a nuclear bomb based on religion is ridiculous. I think it had a little more to do with being sneak attacked at Pearl Harbor.....don't you?
Your ridiculous assumption is more interesting. You might call it "revenge" but people with a brain might call it responding to a sneak attack and declaration of war.chang50 wrote:Phatscotty wrote:DJ Teflon wrote:Regardless, nuker's original point was that 'religion' prevents nuke-ing.
Yet, where there is plenty of 'religion', exists the only case of nuking in human history, a predominantly dark-side belief of the human condition, a 4th world, no care for the sick, gangs and gun crime on the streets, and an economic and partly military empire.
Where would anyone go to achieve enlightenment? Not the UK, not the US.
![]()
Where would anyone go to live in a sharing community? Same answer.
And that's before we discuss the oil-usage conspiracy kills the planet, literally. If only the empire builders had been polytheists we would have a better chance of saving it. Sadly, the dark-side believers think there is no chance.
First of all, is that really the definition of enlightenment? Free health care and no gangs??? Sounds more like the definition of Socialism with a police state.
How old are you? Your connection that dropping a nuclear bomb based on religion is ridiculous. I think it had a little more to do with being sneak attacked at Pearl Harbor.....don't you?
So it was revenge,not the usually given reason of shortening the war and saving American lives?Interesting..
lmao. Okay so I will guess that you are 12.DJ Teflon wrote:No gangs and free health care correlates with the ability to become enlightened. There was no logical explanation that one leads to the other, but thanks for pointing out the correlation: try being enlightened with a bullet in your head in a gutter.Phatscotty wrote:First of all, is that really the definition of enlightenment? Free health care and no gangs??? Sounds more like the definition of Socialism with a police state.
Nuker was the one who claimed that 'religion' prevents nuke-ing - address your concern to him.Phatscotty wrote:How old are you? Your connection that dropping a nuclear bomb based on religion is ridiculous. I think it had a little more to do with being sneak attacked at Pearl Harbor.....don't you?
I think you may have revealed the nuker ideology regarding nukeing - it is apparently justified according to the old testament "eye for an eye". Next time, please consult a mathematician before killing millions. Same lack of maths occurred when your banks got plane-d. Maybe its as simple as realising that maths is plural, more than just one number in the universe.
You can be on John's Dark-Side team in the ultimate warPhatscotty wrote: people with a United-Statsian-texas-version-yeah-hah-god-bless-america brain might call it responding to a sneak attack and declaration of war.
Okay, it's clear that you are a child who is just now learning to judge everything by stereotypes.DJ Teflon wrote:You can be on John's Dark-Side team in the ultimate warPhatscotty wrote: people with a United-Statsian-texas-version-yeah-hah-god-bless-america brain might call it responding to a sneak attack and declaration of war.
If it was revenge, why would we give them repeated warnings????????Phatscotty wrote:Your ridiculous assumption is more interesting. You might call it "revenge" but people with a brain might call it responding to a sneak attack and declaration of war.chang50 wrote:Phatscotty wrote:DJ Teflon wrote:Regardless, nuker's original point was that 'religion' prevents nuke-ing.
Yet, where there is plenty of 'religion', exists the only case of nuking in human history, a predominantly dark-side belief of the human condition, a 4th world, no care for the sick, gangs and gun crime on the streets, and an economic and partly military empire.
Where would anyone go to achieve enlightenment? Not the UK, not the US.
![]()
Where would anyone go to live in a sharing community? Same answer.
And that's before we discuss the oil-usage conspiracy kills the planet, literally. If only the empire builders had been polytheists we would have a better chance of saving it. Sadly, the dark-side believers think there is no chance.
First of all, is that really the definition of enlightenment? Free health care and no gangs??? Sounds more like the definition of Socialism with a police state.
How old are you? Your connection that dropping a nuclear bomb based on religion is ridiculous. I think it had a little more to do with being sneak attacked at Pearl Harbor.....don't you?
So it was revenge,not the usually given reason of shortening the war and saving American lives?Interesting..
It was you who implied the Japanese deserved it,and I never said it was wrong to seek revenge,only that it is not the reason generally quoted.Calm down and don't get your panties in a bunch because you made a mistake about chimps being herbivores.Phatscotty wrote:Your ridiculous assumption is more interesting. You might call it "revenge" but people with a brain might call it responding to a sneak attack and declaration of war.chang50 wrote:Phatscotty wrote:DJ Teflon wrote:Regardless, nuker's original point was that 'religion' prevents nuke-ing.
Yet, where there is plenty of 'religion', exists the only case of nuking in human history, a predominantly dark-side belief of the human condition, a 4th world, no care for the sick, gangs and gun crime on the streets, and an economic and partly military empire.
Where would anyone go to achieve enlightenment? Not the UK, not the US.
![]()
Where would anyone go to live in a sharing community? Same answer.
And that's before we discuss the oil-usage conspiracy kills the planet, literally. If only the empire builders had been polytheists we would have a better chance of saving it. Sadly, the dark-side believers think there is no chance.
First of all, is that really the definition of enlightenment? Free health care and no gangs??? Sounds more like the definition of Socialism with a police state.
How old are you? Your connection that dropping a nuclear bomb based on religion is ridiculous. I think it had a little more to do with being sneak attacked at Pearl Harbor.....don't you?
So it was revenge,not the usually given reason of shortening the war and saving American lives?Interesting..
God Bless AmericaPhatscotty wrote:Japan did in fact surrender shortly after we dropped the bombs.
yeah and? Of course they deserved it. If they didn't sneak attack us, we wouldn't have gone to war, and if we didn't go to war, we wouldn't have dropped the bomb.chang50 wrote:It was you who implied the Japanese deserved it,and I never said it was wrong to seek revenge,only that it is not the reason generally quoted.Phatscotty wrote:Your ridiculous assumption is more interesting. You might call it "revenge" but people with a brain might call it responding to a sneak attack and declaration of war.chang50 wrote:Phatscotty wrote:DJ Teflon wrote:Regardless, nuker's original point was that 'religion' prevents nuke-ing.
Yet, where there is plenty of 'religion', exists the only case of nuking in human history, a predominantly dark-side belief of the human condition, a 4th world, no care for the sick, gangs and gun crime on the streets, and an economic and partly military empire.
Where would anyone go to achieve enlightenment? Not the UK, not the US.
![]()
Where would anyone go to live in a sharing community? Same answer.
And that's before we discuss the oil-usage conspiracy kills the planet, literally. If only the empire builders had been polytheists we would have a better chance of saving it. Sadly, the dark-side believers think there is no chance.
First of all, is that really the definition of enlightenment? Free health care and no gangs??? Sounds more like the definition of Socialism with a police state.
How old are you? Your connection that dropping a nuclear bomb based on religion is ridiculous. I think it had a little more to do with being sneak attacked at Pearl Harbor.....don't you?
So it was revenge,not the usually given reason of shortening the war and saving American lives?Interesting..
You are consumed with hate Teflon. It's so bad you can't even think straight. At least it will lead to a happy life full of meaning.DJ Teflon wrote:God Bless AmericaPhatscotty wrote:Japan did in fact surrender shortly after we dropped the bombs.
You have the moral high ground
Yeah, dropping nukes is a negative spin.Phatscotty wrote:You are just trying to put a negative spin on it.
Yeah, so much hate I think I might actually not drop a nuke on anyone I dont know.Phatscotty wrote:You are consumed with hate Teflon. It's so bad you can't even think straight. At least it will lead to a happy life full of meaning.
Keep us posted
It's not spin at all. It's victory.DJ Teflon wrote:Yeah, dropping nukes is a negative spin.Phatscotty wrote:You are just trying to put a negative spin on it.
So, its a negative spin but it isnt a negative spin?Phatscotty wrote:It's not spin at all. It's victory.DJ Teflon wrote:Yeah, dropping nukes is a negative spin.Phatscotty wrote:You are just trying to put a negative spin on it.
You f*ck with the bull, you get the horns. Don't start what you can't finish.
How about not starting the war in the first place?DJ Teflon wrote:So, its a negative spin but it isnt a negative spin?Phatscotty wrote:It's not spin at all. It's victory.DJ Teflon wrote:Yeah, dropping nukes is a negative spin.Phatscotty wrote:You are just trying to put a negative spin on it.
You f*ck with the bull, you get the horns. Don't start what you can't finish.
So, its a negative spin but it isnt a negative spin and Jesus died on a cross because he started the war?Phatscotty wrote:How about not starting the war in the first place?DJ Teflon wrote:So, its a negative spin but it isnt a negative spin?Phatscotty wrote:It's not spin at all. It's victory.DJ Teflon wrote:Yeah, dropping nukes is a negative spin.Phatscotty wrote:You are just trying to put a negative spin on it.
You f*ck with the bull, you get the horns. Don't start what you can't finish.