1st post added too
Moderator: Community Team


You're definitely not helping your own argument here, just so you know.Phatscotty wrote:That's about as likely as the Joker becoming the next Batman. Happy people who are grateful and try to help others of their own free will with their own money are not exactly the type. Look to those who are miserable, empty, guilt ridden, and think everyone else owes them something, and look to the day when they don't get it. There's your unibomber.a6mzero wrote:I'm beginning to think hes going to be the next unibomber.
That really what you get from an 'episode' about leaving people the hell alone, not claiming other people's stuff as your own, to each their own, live and let live? I would think those who have entitled themselves to Other People's Property would be the first to make the crossover from O.P.P. to entitling themselves to other people's lives. Listen to them once in a while, whoever disagrees with taking OPP is 'worthless' 'evil' and 'has no heart'...not that hard to see what's next or to make the case they are not worthy and don't deserve to live amongst themselves.
Just revisit the original post. It's not a stretch to go from 'so and so is xyz, why are they allowed to speak?' to 'so and so is XYZ, why are they allowed to live?' Think about it.
It's not funny at all. But it is ironic.mrswdk wrote:Funny to have to explain the concept of free speech to a forum used mostly by Americans.

mrswdk wrote:Funny to have to explain the concept of free speech to a forum used mostly by Americans.
What's your opinion on the freedom of labor, PS? How about the freedom of immigrants--legal and/or illegal?Phatscotty wrote:mrswdk wrote:Funny to have to explain the concept of free speech to a forum used mostly by Americans.
Freedom means less and less these days. I bet if you asked them most if not all would tell you they have the freedom to not be offended.
AndyDufresne wrote:BBS, FREDOM (sic) is not FRE (sic)
--Andy

Irony...it's not just what's for breakfast anymore.Phatscotty wrote:mrswdk wrote:Funny to have to explain the concept of free speech to a forum used mostly by Americans.
Freedom means less and less these days. I bet if you asked them most if not all would tell you they have the freedom to not be offended.


I've filed one report during all my years here, just one, and that report had nothing to do with insults, flaming or the like. I don't get why people piss themselves when someone insult them, it is the internet after all, stfu and grow a pair.BigBallinStalin wrote:Hey, PS. How many reports have you filed against other users?
Did it take you this long to find the smilies or why are you so damn happy? You're not getting paid for this remember.TeeGee wrote:<--- me
![]()
![]()
<-- all of you
1st post added too
<--- me

I've always gone overboard on the smilies and it must be the chill pills I am onGillipig wrote:Did it take you this long to find the smilies or why are you so damn happy? You're not getting paid for this remember.TeeGee wrote:<--- me
![]()
![]()
<-- all of you
1st post added too
<--- me

So you only lift the banhammer when it's unwarranted? That's a unique way of going about moderation, but hey, it's not like it matters anyway because again, you ain't gettin paidTeeGee wrote:I've always gone overboard on the smilies and it must be the chill pills I am onGillipig wrote:Did it take you this long to find the smilies or why are you so damn happy? You're not getting paid for this remember.TeeGee wrote:<--- me
![]()
![]()
<-- all of you
1st post added too
<--- me
![]()
![]()
I'm not getting paid???? Holy crap, I thought I wasANARCHY!!!!
Actually gilli, believe it or not, I don't see myself as a representative of the site administration, but as one of the forum user.. That is why I have lobbied for and am slowly reintroducing the old rules and values that CC had. I have the lowest (by far) record of forum bans handed out by any head global mod. The last ban I think I handed out was to you last December for them pics of your sister
Good to see your fight against tryanny continues unabated (unless the tyranny benefits you... then it abates).Phatscotty wrote:I'm aware of what you are interested in, and you are aware when that's gonna happen. I have always been interested in straight up answers from you as well, while rarely receiving them. While it doesn't matter what I say and your mind is clearly already made up without the information; let's stop with the pissing contest in this thread. You got your negative comments in, you'll have to wait until I drop an honest answer, and then you can go right back to calling it all lies and whatever else negative you need to say about me. Like I'm gonna start telling lies about what everyone knows to be the truth??? Give it a rest Mets.Metsfanmax wrote:Not interested in the "2 pager." BBS asked for a one word answer. That's all I'm interested in reading.Phatscotty wrote:And when I do release the 2 pager
You want to attack me and hurt me? Save it for the ring.