Moderator: Community Team
I see how you think Tim could be suspicious but hes probably just making joke vote stage comments. It looks like we are moving on though so I do agree that Aage's statement is suspicious especially when hes asking you to explain yourself. Seems like you explained yourself well already. Not sure what line your going with that.aage wrote:Explain yourself.madmitch wrote:Aage your statement about Tim is highly suspicious almost to the point of being scummy,are you trying to get the light off you?Speculating about the roles is kind of pointless at the moment. If there is a cop, he is a sane cop. If there is a doc, he is a sane cop. (Unless Mitch is one of them of course.)
Tim, you are slightly suspicious there.
Why is it "highly suspicious" that I think Tim is slightly suspicious? His posts heavily indicate he does not have a power role. I'm asking you to explain yourself because your point of "getting the light off me" is bullshit, there was no light on me.madmitch wrote:just wondering why you voted for and why you mentioned Tim's remarked ? If my vote was a joke vote fine, if not why ? IT's just I don't find anything particularly scummy yet accept your remark against Tim
Its our job to scum hunt. Whilst maybe Mitch is wrongly questioning aage, aage's reaction does raise questions.bosaardbeitje wrote:I agree with Subtle, Mitch's accusation of Aage is not well-founded.
And why is Mitch aaaaaaaaaaaall of a sudden questioning Aage's jokevote? It was quite obvious Aage was only voting for Mitch, because Mitch was practically asking for a vote...
How do you interpret Tim's posts as him not having a PR? I just re-read them and they don't really hint at anything to me.aage wrote:Why is it "highly suspicious" that I think Tim is slightly suspicious? His posts heavily indicate he does not have a power role. I'm asking you to explain yourself because your point of "getting the light off me" is bullshit, there was no light on me.madmitch wrote:just wondering why you voted for and why you mentioned Tim's remarked ? If my vote was a joke vote fine, if not why ? IT's just I don't find anything particularly scummy yet accept your remark against Tim
StorrZerg wrote: i find no joy in this
We don't need all the pieces to start puzzling. Since this game is intended as a tutorial game, I'll elaborate a bit. Day one is usually very boring. There will always be people who don't post much - this is either because they're not online, or because they don't have anything to comment on. Sitting around waiting for them to post helps in neither case. As town, it's better to make a move yourself than to sit on your hands. Wcw's and rizky's presence is not required for us to make these moves, because we will play our role and respond to each other regardless of them. Hiding behind their absence instead of participating is scummy, in my opinion. This is also the reason I 'made a move' against Tim. I want to see how Tim responds, yes, but it is also intended to see how others respond.bosaardbeitje wrote:We really need to hear from wcwnww and rizky... We cannot start a proper analysis as long as they don't post in here.
Streaker wrote:This is why Mods ask players to colour, and bold their votes. Votes are easily missed, and I tend to miss easy.TimWoodbury wrote:Epitaph1 wrote:I'm glad the cops are sane.
seems odd how do you KNOW cop is sane?? vote epi for assumeing things already bad bad epi
Please use this format:
Vote Streaker, or any variant but colour and bold is required.
I edited the vote count.
Thank you for your understanding.
Just gotta make sure you hit it at the right times, or make sure you've highlighted ALL the critical words.TimWoodbury wrote:Streaker wrote:This is why Mods ask players to colour, and bold their votes. Votes are easily missed, and I tend to miss easy.TimWoodbury wrote:Epitaph1 wrote:I'm glad the cops are sane.
seems odd how do you KNOW cop is sane?? vote epi for assumeing things already bad bad epi
Please use this format:
Vote Streaker, or any variant but colour and bold is required.
I edited the vote count.
Thank you for your understanding.
that is my bad i had thought i had clicked the red and bold actually looking at it it has the color and B tag so not shure why it didnt bold.
aage wrote:Why is it "highly suspicious" that I think Tim is slightly suspicious? His posts heavily indicate he does not have a power role. I'm asking you to explain yourself because your point of "getting the light off me" is bullshit, there was no light on me.madmitch wrote:just wondering why you voted for and why you mentioned Tim's remarked ? If my vote was a joke vote fine, if not why ? IT's just I don't find anything particularly scummy yet accept your remark against Tim
was in fact a joke vote sorry if the way i worded it gave a off sense of readingEpitaph1 wrote:
Btw Tim, was your vote on me a joke or serious? I remember thinking it was a joke when it first happened, but after a re-read it looked serious.
im curious are you seeing it and interested in pressureing either of us ecause you dont care who gets lynched as long as its not you?? hmmm always ways to be interperted differant. im gonna do dishes(just got hoem from work so checking in on games and such now before hores) and then reread the thread and i can post some more then about currently potential reads.subtleknifewield wrote:True, it is a very learning experience
So I think I see where Epi is coming from when he talks about Tim as well, on top of my suspicions over Mitch. I would be ok with pressuring either now and seeing if anything turns up.
Hinted at being no PR is the very definition of softclaim, as opposed to a full claim where you outright state it. So yes, you softclaimed.TimWoodbury wrote:im curious are you seeing it and interested in pressureing either of us ecause you dont care who gets lynched as long as its not you?? hmmm always ways to be interperted differant. im gonna do dishes(just got hoem from work so checking in on games and such now before hores) and then reread the thread and i can post some more then about currently potential reads.subtleknifewield wrote:True, it is a very learning experience
So I think I see where Epi is coming from when he talks about Tim as well, on top of my suspicions over Mitch. I would be ok with pressuring either now and seeing if anything turns up.
@aage are you deflecting onto me by answereing mitches question with a question about me? possable skumy though cant say uur skummy jsut or that gotta look more at it
@subtleknife nope didnt claim anything im just saying that there can be a et up with only VT's set up with 1 or 2 power roles so him saying that because i hinted at being non PR dont mean im skum