Page 4 of 7
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 1:40 pm
by unriggable
Anarkistsdream wrote:unriggable wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:I am circumsized...
I feel bad for men who aren't.
Uh, why?
It is unhealthy. You have to put more effort into cleaning your privates. Smegma.... YUCK!
http://www.cirp.org/library/normal/wright1/
Many women find uncircumsized men unattractive... I've never heard of a woman that preferred a man to still have his foreskin.
That's because she was making love to a circumcised man at the time.
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:32 pm
by vtmarik
Anarkistsdream wrote:It is unhealthy. You have to put more effort into cleaning your privates. Smegma.... YUCK!
Yeah, what a crime, having a reason to touch yourself.
Many women find uncircumsized men unattractive... I've never heard of a woman that preferred a man to still have his foreskin.
I have, in fact I've seen at least three different blips in forums and chat rooms where the girl said she only did it with "uncut guys."
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:46 pm
by Colaalone
Anarkistsdream wrote:
It is unhealthy. You have to put more effort into cleaning your privates. Smegma.... YUCK!
Thats pretty childish

BUT MOM! I don't wanna take a bath!
It's not unhealthy to have a foreskin. Its unhealthy to not properly clean yourself.
Anarkistsdream wrote:
Many women find uncircumsized men unattractive... I've never heard of a woman that preferred a man to still have his foreskin.
For every woman who says this, there is one who will say the opposite.
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:53 pm
by Syzygy
unriggable wrote:The1exile wrote:A friend of mine is circumcised. For the past 5 years or more we've taken the piss out of him for it. In a good way.
Don't see the point in it at all really.
Nice sig.
Lol, yeah.

Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:53 pm
by wicked
Just to clear something up, we don't care what it looks like, just what it does... and it's not that attractive anyway, whether snipped or not.

Carry on.
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:55 pm
by Syzygy
Oh, btw: I'm snipped. (At birth, at my briss. It doesn't really phase me though.)
And @ Wicked: I recall a movie describing it as a piece of leftover elbow flesh.
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 3:07 pm
by diddle
Colaalone wrote:RobinJ wrote:Don't think circumcision is something I would ever really want to have done but I have heard that it makes sex more pleasurable for women...

Ever think the reason that rumor is spread is due to the fact that a majority of males are circumsized?

Its fucking horrible stuff. Mutlation of a infants genitals in the first 24 hours of its life in the real world. Its 12 square inches of extremely erogenous tissue with unique zones of specialized nerves. The foreskin is there for a reason: to protect. You think years of
rubbing against denim WON'T desensitize it? And the whole hygenie thing, how hard is it to just roll it back and CLEAN IT? For christ sake I'm not gonna chop my ear off just because it gets infected if I neglect to clean the sonofabitch.
you wear denim boxers!!!!!

Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 3:09 pm
by Anarkistsdream
wicked wrote:Just to clear something up, we don't care what it looks like, just what it does... and it's not that attractive anyway, whether snipped or not.

Carry on.
And this right here shows what an unsexual, cold bitch you are....
I know MANY women that say the opposite... They DO care what it looks like... There are ugly cocks and there are good looking ones... Ones that have hair all up and down the shat tand have big, nasty heads...
In any case, if you don't care what it looks like, you are either 1) desperate or 2) blind.
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 3:12 pm
by Colaalone
diddle wrote:
you wear denim boxers!!!!!

You're right. A thin layer of cloth makes a huge difference. Anyways...
Anatomical research shows that the foreskin is erogenous tissue. Cutting the foreskin off desensitizes the penis. Circumcision also causes the surface of the externalized glans to dry out, thicken and toughen, causing even more desensitization. Many circumcised males have a hard time dealing with the realization that their penis has been permanently desensitized.
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 3:15 pm
by Anarkistsdream
Colaalone wrote:diddle wrote:
you wear denim boxers!!!!!

You're right. A thin layer of cloth makes a huge difference. Anyways...
Anatomical research shows that the foreskin is erogenous tissue. Cutting the foreskin off desensitizes the penis. Circumcision also causes the surface of the externalized glans to dry out, thicken and toughen, causing even more desensitization. Many circumcised males have a hard time dealing with the realization that their penis has been permanently desensitized.
Except that most people had it done at birth, and so they know no difference...
f*ck, if I still had my foreskin, I sure as hell wouldn't let someone chop it off now!!!
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 3:48 pm
by wicked
wow, I must be only lucky person to have not seen any "ugly" ones like yours Ank.

I'm sure if you whipped it out and it was all crusty and scaly and hairy and gross like you describe, I'd run screaming. Thankfully I've never run across that.
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 3:50 pm
by Anarkistsdream
wicked wrote:wow, I must be only lucky person to have not seen any "ugly" ones like yours Ank.

I'm sure if you whipped it out and it was all crusty and scaly and hairy and gross like you describe, I'd run screaming. Thankfully I've never run across that.
Don't be a fucking hypocrite, Wicked...
Keep flames to the Flame Forum...
Once again, you show what a total asshole you really are in life, and how being a mod on this site is the only sexual satisfaction you have.
As for seeing a cock, Wicked, I doubt any man has been dumb enough to be naked around you anyway.
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 3:52 pm
by diddle
Anarkistsdream wrote:wicked wrote:wow, I must be only lucky person to have not seen any "ugly" ones like yours Ank.

I'm sure if you whipped it out and it was all crusty and scaly and hairy and gross like you describe, I'd run screaming. Thankfully I've never run across that.
Don't be a fucking hypocrite, Wicked...
Keep flames to the Flame Forum...
Once again, you show what a total asshole you really are in life, and how being a mod on this site is the only sexual satisfaction you have.
As for seeing a cock, Wicked, I doubt any man has been dumb enough to be naked around you anyway.
now who's the hypocrite
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 3:53 pm
by Anarkistsdream
diddle wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:wicked wrote:wow, I must be only lucky person to have not seen any "ugly" ones like yours Ank.

I'm sure if you whipped it out and it was all crusty and scaly and hairy and gross like you describe, I'd run screaming. Thankfully I've never run across that.
Don't be a fucking hypocrite, Wicked...
Keep flames to the Flame Forum...
Once again, you show what a total asshole you really are in life, and how being a mod on this site is the only sexual satisfaction you have.
As for seeing a cock, Wicked, I doubt any man has been dumb enough to be naked around you anyway.
now who's the hypocrite
That was the point diddle... Very good, young man.
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 3:54 pm
by hecter
wicked, maybe you should add the option to your poll saying "I'm a woman", so that they can vote…
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 3:54 pm
by diddle
Anarkistsdream wrote:diddle wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:wicked wrote:wow, I must be only lucky person to have not seen any "ugly" ones like yours Ank.

I'm sure if you whipped it out and it was all crusty and scaly and hairy and gross like you describe, I'd run screaming. Thankfully I've never run across that.
Don't be a fucking hypocrite, Wicked...
Keep flames to the Flame Forum...
Once again, you show what a total asshole you really are in life, and how being a mod on this site is the only sexual satisfaction you have.
As for seeing a cock, Wicked, I doubt any man has been dumb enough to be naked around you anyway.
now who's the hypocrite
That was the point diddle... Very good, young man.
yeah, sure it was, you keep thinking that
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 3:55 pm
by Anarkistsdream
Actually, Diddle... The whole thing was a flame... You didn't bold all of the insults...
So, yes, it was the point... A point that I guess you DID miss.
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 3:56 pm
by diddle
Anarkistsdream wrote:Actually, Diddle... The whole thing was a flame... You didn't bold all of the insults...
So, yes, it was the point... A point that I guess you DID miss.
yes, yes i did, or maybe i didn't or maybe i did
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 3:57 pm
by 2dimes
Foreskin tilt!
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 3:57 pm
by Anarkistsdream
diddle wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:Actually, Diddle... The whole thing was a flame... You didn't bold all of the insults...
So, yes, it was the point... A point that I guess you DID miss.
yes, yes i did, or maybe i didn't or maybe i did
*terrible italian accent* You a-make-a my 'ead asplode!
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:07 pm
by wicked
Ank, you used to be much nicer, and fun to debate. Sounds like you need to get laid.

but I digress...
back to foreskin!

Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:09 pm
by Colaalone
Anarkistsdream wrote:Colaalone wrote:
Anatomical research shows that the foreskin is erogenous tissue. Cutting the foreskin off desensitizes the penis. Circumcision also causes the surface of the externalized glans to dry out, thicken and toughen, causing even more desensitization. Many circumcised males have a hard time dealing with the realization that their penis has been permanently desensitized.
Except that most people had it done at birth, and so they know no difference...
f*ck, if I still had my foreskin, I sure as hell wouldn't let someone chop it off now!!!
Ahh good point. Why not just chop someones ears off at birth. Its not like they would know any difference.
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 5:58 pm
by Anarkistsdream
wicked wrote:Ank, you used to be much nicer, and fun to debate. Sounds like you need to get laid.

but I digress...
back to foreskin!

You know it's just that I have a crush on you, babe.
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 6:57 pm
by Dancing Mustard
hecter wrote:wicked, maybe you should add the option to your poll saying "I'm a woman", so that they can vote…
Yeah wicked, you sexist pig. It's polls like these that have been keeping women out of the workplace for decades! Shame on you.
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 7:22 pm
by Aegnor
wicked wrote:Just to clear something up, we don't care what it looks like, just what it does... and it's not that attractive anyway, whether snipped or not.

Carry on.
Meh, that's only your opinion!
Sigh, I suppose we wouldn't be hiding them if they were so good-lookin'
But anyway, I think that the uncircumcised ones look worse (Don't ask me how I know how they look, too much porn may have its downsides

), and unfortunately, the foreskin contains a high concentration of nerve-ends, and some researches indicated that uncircumcised people enjoy more stimulation in that area.
I must say that if I hadn't been circumcised as a babe, I wouldn't go and do it voluntarily as an adult. (I'd prefer the pleasure over the looks any day

)