Are CC stupid?

[Timminz]

Hello stupid thread.

[sailorseal]

Hello stupid thread.

Show some respect, he sells stuff to Blue Chip companies and to the Kazakhstan Government!

[targetman377]

lol this thread has just made my day, i love it great!!!!!!!!!

[Lucarilover240]

Target is going to get torn apart in this thread. Poor target...

[targetman377]

Target is going to get torn apart in this thread. Poor target...

what how so?? is it cause i alone could crash CC severs just cause of my bad english skills????

[Lucarilover240]

Target is going to get torn apart in this thread. Poor target...

what how so?? is it cause i alone could crash CC severs just cause of my bad english skills????

No, it's because all the grammar nazis are here. They will tear your sentences to shreds. Run.

[targetman377]

Never i will stand my ground.

[xelabale]

Never i will stand my ground.

This implies that you will never stand your ground, coward. Is this what you really meant? 4/10, see me.

[Lucarilover240]

Never i will stand my ground.

This implies that you will never stand your ground, coward. Is this what you really meant? 4/10, see me.

See what I mean, Target?

[jonesthecurl]

This site could be a mega cash cow with what it has given the right people behind it. Not saying Lack is not doing a good job, but things could be ramped up even more.

Once you realise that CC is effectively a one-turtle show, then the frustration at the lack of progress becomes more understandable, if not more bearable.

If I was running a website that provided me with a tidy income, then perhaps I'd be content to keep it ticking over??

It's a matter of ambition, desire and nous - lack is just one hero in a half-shell - more could be done with four turtles at the helm, but then the pizza would have to be split four ways

True, true, there are a plethora of means to make more money from the site... my proposal is that all members pay CC per turtle metaphor instead of by annual subscription.

If this new method is not put into operation immediately i can only assume that our experience has tort-us nothing!

You're sticking your neck out there. Don't shell yourshelf short. But I think the idea is, like, turtley awesome. (I think that comes to $3)

[targetman377]

Never i will stand my ground.

This implies that you will never stand your ground, coward. Is this what you really meant? 4/10, see me.

Really, I did not know that thanks for the english lessen this could get fun

[Dublanous1]

yeah you guys need better gramer

[pmchugh]

what have I done??? lol

[mpjh]

That should be, "What have I done?"

[jonesthecurl]

Why, what have you done?

[mpjh]

No, not "what have I done," but "What have I done."

[targetman377]

No, not "what have I done," but "What have I done."

No you are wrong, you are asking a question so it should be "What have I done?"

[mpjh]

No, I am making a statement that it should be "What have I done" and not "what have I done."

[targetman377]

No, I am making a statement that it should be "What have I done" and not "what have I done."

Well the way that it was origainal used was a question. Therefore it would be a qestion mark.

[xelabale]

No, I am making a statement that it should be "What have I done" and not "what have I done."

Well the way that it was origainal used was a question. Therefore it would be a qestion mark.

Your referent in the first sentence, "it", refers to the statement quoted above. However, your referent in the second sentence, "it" appears to be different, leading to extra load being placed on the reader. This is incorrect use of referents, lamentably a common mistake.

Apart from that your sentence was written good.

[mpjh]

A good student would have noticed that a correct reading of that initial statement would have brought the student to the conclusion that the lower case was inappropriate for the Initial "w."

[targetman377]

I see

[Lucarilover240]

No, I am making a statement that it should be "What have I done" and not "what have I done."

Well the way that it was origainal used was a question. Therefore it would be a qestion mark.

Your referent in the first sentence, "it", refers to the statement quoted above. However, your referent in the second sentence, "it" appears to be different, leading to extra load being placed on the reader. This is incorrect use of referents, lamentably a common mistake.

Apart from that your sentence was written good.

Actually, it's "well", as in "Apart from that, your sentence was written well."

[xelabale]

No, I am making a statement that it should be "What have I done" and not "what have I done."

Well the way that it was origainal used was a question. Therefore it would be a qestion mark.

Your referent in the first sentence, "it", refers to the statement quoted above. However, your referent in the second sentence, "it" appears to be different, leading to extra load being placed on the reader. This is incorrect use of referents, lamentably a common mistake.

Apart from that your sentence was written good.

Actually, it's "well", as in "Apart from that, your sentence was written well."

thanks

[pmchugh]

No, I am making a statement that it should be "What have I done" and not "what have I done."

Well the way that it was origainal used was a question. Therefore it would be a qestion mark.

Your referent in the first sentence, "it", refers to the statement quoted above. However, your referent in the second sentence, "it" appears to be different, leading to extra load being placed on the reader. This is incorrect use of referents, lamentably a common mistake.

Apart from that your sentence was written good.

Actually, it's "well", as in "Apart from that, your sentence was written well."

Thanks.