Moderator: Community Team
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
hmm yes let's hear more about human psychology from the guy who unironically refers to "alpha" and "beta" malesGabonX wrote:The pot shouldn't call the kettle black.SultanOfSurreal wrote:gabon's post is the kind of retarded bullshit we get when people who have no idea what the hell they're talking about decide they're experts on human behavior
The fact is that the consensus up to a point indicated that homosexuality was a psychological condition and this data was thrown out for political reasons. The fact that people reject the idea without giving it any kind of rational consideration is indicative of the fact that the science on this topic is skewed.
What about people who are attracted to animals? Is this a psychological condition or are there actually people out there who are genetically inclined to f*ck fish?
It demonstrates empirically that circumstance can cause people to resort to homosexuality. In prison you have a number of alpha males who are used to having sex with women who no longer have access to women and compensate for this with homosexual behavior.SultanOfSurreal wrote:there is a difference between homosexual behavior and homosexuality, almost every "prison gay" person self-identifies as straight and remains attracted to women
Beta males who can not reach women and carry on a normal sexual relationship in the outside world are known to resort to homosexuality because they get frustrated at their lack success. They convince themselves that they were born gay and use this to rationalize their failure with women.
This isn't the only cause of homosexuality but it is a big one.Yes, tastes can be acquired over time.Neoteny wrote:No no, he's right. Even though I don't like broccoli, if I choose to like broccoli it tastes so much better. Eating is based on biology. Taste is mental.SultanOfSurreal wrote:there is a difference between homosexual behavior and homosexuality, almost every "prison gay" person self-identifies as straight and remains attracted to womenGabonX wrote:People have an emotional reaction to the idea that sexuality is based on psychology rather than genetics. People are actually offended that someone could question the validity of whether or not people are born gay or straight. This should come as a red flag to anyone who really wants to delve into the subject with an open mind.
Sex (ie reproduction) is based on biology. Sexuality is mental.
gabon's post is the kind of retarded bullshit we get when people who have no idea what the hell they're talking about decide they're experts on human behavior

Aside from semantics (yes, sexuality is about thinking, not just physical structure), while an absolute answer is not yet forthcoming, the proponderance of evidence suggests a combination of biology and enviornmental causes make the basic difference. Add in to this the further question of acting upon impluses and its complicated.GabonX wrote:Unless you're in prison...PLAYER57832 wrote:Sexuality seems to be more biology than environment, but only time will really tell.GabonX wrote:
It will be interesting to see what kind of affect, if any, this has on the child's orientation. Dare I say that there is an increased likeliness that Pop will be a homosexual or bisexual?
Yes, I dare..and if this is the case the bleeding heart liberals have shot themselves in the foot with this one.
People have an emotional reaction to the idea that sexuality is based on psychology rather than genetics. People are actually offended that someone could question the validity of whether or not people are born gay or straight. This should come as a red flag to anyone who really wants to delve into the subject with an open mind.
Sex (ie reproduction) is based on biology. Sexuality is mental.
Not sure what that picture has to do with anything, and just because a man is a beefcake like the one in the picture, doesn't mean he's any good with women. Quite the opposite, if he does not know how to approach a woman without frightening her (which often happens when men of that size approach women who they do not know) it may actually be harder for him than a smaller, less physically intimidating male..SultanOfSurreal wrote: hmm yes let's hear more about human psychology from the guy who unironically refers to "alpha" and "beta" males
yep this sure does look like an inferior, effeminate man who could never find a woman willing to sleep with him
of all the explanations for homosexuality advanced by you homophobic piles of human detritus, this has got to be the most hilariously implausible
How is insulting you an emotional reaction?GabonX wrote:Snorri1234 wrote:Well yeah but you dare because you're such a huge moron.GabonX wrote: Yes, I dare..and if this is the case the bleeding heart liberals have shot themselves in the foot with this one.![]()
![]()
This is what I mean when I say "offended" or "emotional reaction."
wow that sure is a lot of completely unsupported bullshit, please give me more in-depth analysis of these figures which you've pulled out of your assGabonX wrote: Not sure what that picture has to do with anything, and just because a man is a beefcake like the one in the picture, doesn't mean he's any good with women. Quite the opposite, if he does not know how to approach a woman without frightening her (which often happens when men of that size approach women who they do not know) it may actually be harder for him than a smaller, less physically intimidating male..
As for "alpha" and "beta," when referring to human sexuality, or the sexuality of a great many other animals, the terms are of great value. In regards to human sexuality, I've read that as much as 90% of all sex which is had, is had by only 10% of the male population. That means that the other 10% of sex which occurs is shared among the majority figure of 90% of men.
Allow me to explain, capital letters will refer to men and lower case letters will refer to women:
A abcdefg
B abcde
C cd
D d
E e
F
G
The figure above is a model of male-female sexual coupling behavior. In general, women have more sex than the average man, mainly because it's easier for them to get, but they only have it with certain males. Sex is not evenly distributed among all people, and those males that know how to get it, get it much more often than than those who do not. This is the difference between "Alpha" and "Beta," and once again, it's largely psychological.
Now consider F and G. These guys are left out. They probably feel as though something is wrong with them. They have a lot in common. For men like this, homosexuality is a plausible alternative to being alone.
The concern I have for "Pop" is that if he is a male and has not been given any guidance, he will end up like F or G. Player is right in stating that the child may cling to traditional gender roles as a result of this experiment, but this may cause other problems.
This is not the path to raising a well adjusted child.
Wow.GabonX wrote: Now consider F and G. These guys are left out. They probably feel as though something is wrong with them. They have a lot in common. For men like this, homosexuality is a plausible alternative to being alone.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
scissoringNeoteny wrote:So... what happens to the extra women?
Why would I be afraid of gay men? Every man who chooses to pursue a homosexual lifestyle is one less man I have to compete with for the affections of women!SultanOfSurreal wrote:seriously though. to racist, i think we can safely add homophobia and sexism in gabonx's growing repertoire of idiocy
if you didn't feel threatened by them you wouldn't feel the need to invent ridiculous theories about how gay men are inherently inferior to straight menGabonX wrote:Why would I be afraid of gay men? Every man who chooses to pursue a homosexual lifestyle is one less man I have to compete with for the affections of women!SultanOfSurreal wrote:seriously though. to racist, i think we can safely add homophobia and sexism in gabonx's growing repertoire of idiocy
I would encourage homosexuality accept that I sincerely feel bad for these guys...
FFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUSultanOfSurreal wrote:scissoringNeoteny wrote:So... what happens to the extra women?
(no, you can't watch)
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
If you didn't feel threatened by reality then you wouldn't feel the need to twist my words around. This isn't inherent, it's psychological.SultanOfSurreal wrote:if you didn't feel threatened by them you wouldn't feel the need to invent ridiculous theories about how gay men are inherently inferior to straight menGabonX wrote:Why would I be afraid of gay men? Every man who chooses to pursue a homosexual lifestyle is one less man I have to compete with for the affections of women!SultanOfSurreal wrote:seriously though. to racist, i think we can safely add homophobia and sexism in gabonx's growing repertoire of idiocy
I would encourage homosexuality accept that I sincerely feel bad for these guys...
If you really want to understand this stuff you're going to have to look beyond the world of homosexual and feminist propaganda (and yes there is a WORLD of homosexual and feminist propaganda).SultanOfSurreal wrote:wow that sure is a lot of completely unsupported bullshit, please give me more in-depth analysis of these figures which you've pulled out of your assGabonX wrote: Not sure what that picture has to do with anything, and just because a man is a beefcake like the one in the picture, doesn't mean he's any good with women. Quite the opposite, if he does not know how to approach a woman without frightening her (which often happens when men of that size approach women who they do not know) it may actually be harder for him than a smaller, less physically intimidating male..
As for "alpha" and "beta," when referring to human sexuality, or the sexuality of a great many other animals, the terms are of great value. In regards to human sexuality, I've read that as much as 90% of all sex which is had, is had by only 10% of the male population. That means that the other 10% of sex which occurs is shared among the majority figure of 90% of men.
Allow me to explain, capital letters will refer to men and lower case letters will refer to women:
A abcdefg
B abcde
C cd
D d
E e
F
G
The figure above is a model of male-female sexual coupling behavior. In general, women have more sex than the average man, mainly because it's easier for them to get, but they only have it with certain males. Sex is not evenly distributed among all people, and those males that know how to get it, get it much more often than than those who do not. This is the difference between "Alpha" and "Beta," and once again, it's largely psychological.
Now consider F and G. These guys are left out. They probably feel as though something is wrong with them. They have a lot in common. For men like this, homosexuality is a plausible alternative to being alone.
The concern I have for "Pop" is that if he is a male and has not been given any guidance, he will end up like F or G. Player is right in stating that the child may cling to traditional gender roles as a result of this experiment, but this may cause other problems.
This is not the path to raising a well adjusted child.
zoophilia is a pathology with no genetic cause. the same goes for any other paraphilia your dumb white trash ass might want to equate with homosexuality nextGabonX wrote: Once again I pose the question (which you have conveniently ignored):
What about people who are attracted to animals? Is this a psychological condition or are there actually people out there who are genetically inclined to f*ck fish?
Wow.GabonX wrote:A pathology huh?![]()
So it's possible that a person would be drawn to animals even though they are not genetically inclined to, but it is absolutely out of the question that a man would be drawn to another man for any reason other than some unverified mystery hormone or protein...
what a nuanced and eloquent understanding of gender you haveFalkomagno wrote:If you have a dick, a Penis , you are a Man.
If you have a pussy, a Vagina, you are a Girl.
Actually, the title of this thread is "swedish couple conceals child's biological sex from the world. I don't think the child gets to pick his/her biological sex. Gender identity? Yes. Sex? No.SultanOfSurreal wrote:what a nuanced and eloquent understanding of gender you haveFalkomagno wrote:If you have a dick, a Penis , you are a Man.
If you have a pussy, a Vagina, you are a Girl.
Just because someone can write well and even be published does not mean they are THE expert in the field. Desmond Morris offers one view, but not the only one. Also, your understanding of his view is not necessarily the only one.GabonX wrote: Read Sperm Wars. Hell, read anything by Desmond Morris. The Naked Ape is a good place to start.
thegreekdog wrote:Actually, the title of this thread is "swedish couple conceals child's biological sex from the world. I don't think the child gets to pick his/her biological sex. Gender identity? Yes. Sex? No.SultanOfSurreal wrote:what a nuanced and eloquent understanding of gender you haveFalkomagno wrote:If you have a dick, a Penis , you are a Man.
If you have a pussy, a Vagina, you are a Girl.
Agreed, there are too many books that are full of good sounding rubbish.PLAYER57832 wrote:Just because someone can write well and even be published does not mean they are THE expert in the field. Desmond Morris offers one view, but not the only one. Also, your understanding of his view is not necessarily the only one.GabonX wrote: Read Sperm Wars. Hell, read anything by Desmond Morris. The Naked Ape is a good place to start.