Doodle Earth [Quenched]

Iliad · Post by **Iliad** » Mon Jun 04, 2007 3:30 am

ClessAlvein wrote:I don't think this has been mentioned before...

Say there are 6 players. Each player cannot *possibly* have 5 cards each because the current card system (I think) excludes the same country card from being in the hands of 2 players simultaneously. 5x6=30 cards, and there are far less than 30 countries on the map. This would invariably produce some kind of error in the code.

Actually thwo people could have the same card.

You could hand in a card in a set and then get the card back, even though it might be a different colour.

There is no "deck".

Iliad · Post by **Iliad** » Mon Jun 04, 2007 3:30 am

Oh and congratulations on the final forge. Can't wait for it to be quenched

The1exile · Post by **The1exile** » Thu Jun 07, 2007 5:03 am

Any timeframe on when this will be up?

Iliad · Post by **Iliad** » Thu Jun 07, 2007 5:03 am

QUENCH!QUENCH!

Seriously. I don't see any problems with it

RobinJ · Post by **RobinJ** » Thu Jun 07, 2007 8:12 am

Iliad wrote:QUENCH!QUENCH!

Seriously. I don't see any problems with it

Exactly - why drag it out any longer. I'm dreading some n00b coming in and complaining about the names (again)

Evil DIMwit · Post by **Evil DIMwit** » Thu Jun 07, 2007 8:49 am

Actually, I'm looking to test the 2-army minimum versus 3 armies on this map -- it may help mitigate some of the advantage of going first (Unfortunately, I'm faced with a dearth of local Risk players who are willing to experiment AND have a lot of time on their hands, so if anyone else feels like testing this with their friends also and telling me what they think, that would be most appreciated (there won't be a poll for this since not everyone who votes would have tested the map to themselves both ways and as such their opinion doesn't matter as much to me (not that it doesn't matter at all; if, say, you have a particularly persuasive argument, I would be happy to read it))).

happy2seeyou · Post by **happy2seeyou** » Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:23 am

I have just now noticed this map. How cute! Looks like a fun quick one to play.

KEYOGI · Post by **KEYOGI** » Sat Jun 09, 2007 9:37 pm

Can we have images and links for the large and small versions of the map, plus XML?

deadly.sporks · Post by **deadly.sporks** » Wed Jun 13, 2007 3:34 pm

So, when can we quench this? I think it's way ready.

Evil DIMwit · Post by **Evil DIMwit** » Wed Jun 13, 2007 5:05 pm

All right, so, not an update at all, but I'm still looking to test 3-army minimum versus a 2-army minimum for this map.

Then again, it might not be such a big deal in which case the usual minimum of 3 would be preferable.

Anyway, images and links:

http://www.freewebs.com/dimagic/SmallWorld19.png

http://www.freewebs.com/dimagic/SmallWorld20XML.png

http://www.freewebs.com/dimagic/SmallWorldSmall2.png

http://www.freewebs.com/dimagic/SmallWorldSmall2XML.png

http://www.freewebs.com/dimagic/DoodleEarthXML.txt

These files will have to be renamed, of course...

Enigma · Post by **Enigma** » Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:55 pm

crayons look a lil pixely in the small map- but no big deal if this cant be fixed. glad you resolved the names issues, i like them how they are now. congratz- cant wait to play

Wisse · Post by **Wisse** » Sat Jun 16, 2007 4:52 am

mayby you can put something behind the army's they are hurting my eayes whit the white background

AndyDufresne · Post by **AndyDufresne** » Sat Jun 16, 2007 2:06 pm

Regarding putting something behind the coordinates, maybe some sort of crayon scribble (lightlt colored) could work as an army shadow of sorts, and still go with the theme of the map. (Similar to Siege using shields, etc)

--Andy

peteeson10 · Post by **peteeson10** » Sun Jun 17, 2007 5:15 pm

NO WAY! who the hell would play on such a gay map!

The1exile · Post by **The1exile** » Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:11 pm

peteeson10 wrote:NO WAY! who the hell would play on such a gay map!

me?

RobinJ · Post by **RobinJ** » Mon Jun 18, 2007 6:54 am

peteeson10 wrote:NO WAY! who the hell would play on such a gay map!

Yes, that was a very good example of constructive criticism

If you can't think of anything intelligent to say then don't say anything

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:54 am

Just wondering, don't CCers diss on landgrab for the fact that they think they're maps look like they were drawn by 7 year olds with crayons?

RobinJ · Post by **RobinJ** » Tue Jun 19, 2007 3:05 am

reverend_kyle wrote:Just wondering, don't CCers diss on landgrab for the fact that they think they're maps look like they were drawn by 7 year olds with crayons?

yeti_c · Post by **yeti_c** » Tue Jun 19, 2007 3:14 am

reverend_kyle wrote:Just wondering, don't CCers diss on landgrab for the fact that they think they're maps look like they were drawn by 7 year olds with crayons?

Nah - That's cos they ARE drawn by crayon...

This "looks" like it was drawn by crayon.

C.

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 3:51 am

yeti_c wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:Just wondering, don't CCers diss on landgrab for the fact that they think they're maps look like they were drawn by 7 year olds with crayons?
Nah - That's cos they ARE drawn by crayon...

This "looks" like it was drawn by crayon.

C.

lol all of them are made on the computer, but i'm not sure this was.

yeti_c · Post by **yeti_c** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 5:20 am

reverend_kyle wrote:
yeti_c wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:Just wondering, don't CCers diss on landgrab for the fact that they think they're maps look like they were drawn by 7 year olds with crayons?
Nah - That's cos they ARE drawn by crayon...

This "looks" like it was drawn by crayon.

C.
lol all of them are made on the computer, but i'm not sure this was.

Well if you're not sure - that means it looks very good... because it's meant to look like it was hand drawn.

C.

Evil DIMwit · Post by **Evil DIMwit** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 1:55 pm

Look upon Draft 21, ye mighty, and despair:

http://www.freewebs.com/dimagic/SmallWorld21.png

http://www.freewebs.com/dimagic/SmallWorld21XML.png

http://www.freewebs.com/dimagic/SmallWorldSmall21.png

http://www.freewebs.com/dimagic/SmallWo ... l21XML.png

http://www.freewebs.com/dimagic/DoodleEarthXML.txt

Issues addressed:
- ) Army shadow doodles

Issues not addressed:
- ) Any other brilliant ideas

The1exile · Post by **The1exile** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 2:31 pm

Evil DIMwit wrote:Look upon Draft 21, ye mighty, and despair:

Didn't we already have that quote?

great map though.

QUENCH QUENCH QUENCH QUENCH QUENCH QUENCH QUENCH QUENCH QUENCH QUENCH QUENCH QUENCH QUENCH QUENCH QUENCH

yeti_c · Post by **yeti_c** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 2:48 pm

I don't like the way Europe and Egypt's shadow overlap the borders...

Can you tweak?

Europe's could go into the spain/portugal bit...
Egypts could go a bit lower.

C.

Coleman · Post by **Coleman** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 2:53 pm

I like the overlap. I couldn't color inside the lines then. Maybe Greenland could use a little overlap as well.

Doodle Earth [Quenched]

Re: Possibly Code Conflict