Page 33 of 39

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 11:54 am
by ga7
wicked wrote:well if Kalish/replacement IS nurse, he should not tell who he's protecting tonight, so scum won't know who to target. Obviously I can help the town the most by actually taking out a scum, but willis can confirm who the scum is (but that should be pretty obvious now). Actually I'd be a better one to protect, but I can understand wanting peace of mind with another cop investigation b/c you cannot trust me 100% until I've proven myself by taking out scum tonight.
Well, I was thinking you might still be SK, but it doesn't make sense since you'd be closer to survive the game if you were helping scum right now. Now what worries me is that I thought Boo was the vig, since he appeared only in Night 1 scene, killing Mandy. The scene at that time hinted with 3 night kills, Aim being targeted twice.
Putting that aside, I really think we need another investigation by Willis to clear it all out, dunno if on you or someone else though.

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 12:00 pm
by wicked
But can you really read into the day scenes? Depends on the mod if there are any clues there or not.

Re: Super Mario Mafia Day 4 - LSU dead!

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 12:01 pm
by wicked
nagerous wrote:9. Day scenes I write will be fun and comical, don’t read too far into them. No clues or game information will be hidden in the text.
There ya go. All the night kills have been explained, I do not think there is a 3rd person killing at night.

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 12:08 pm
by ga7
Ok, Nag putted that rule but they obviously made sense. Gimpy's the one beating up people, Willis roleblocked was beaten up by Pancake, etc... So, it's not that I read much into them, it's that they seem accurate. Of course, there's the possibility Nag's just screwing with us too. Ah well, we'll see tonight :P

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 12:21 pm
by nagerous
Sorry, that was an error on my part as I copy and pasted the rules from my other game in a rush without thinking about them properly. :( That rule has been removed, there is the possibility of clues in the scenes. Once again I apologise for screwing up.

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 12:25 pm
by LSU Tiger Josh
](*,) ](*,) ](*,)

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 12:27 pm
by ga7
Ha! Thought so, I don't think it's had much influence anyway :wink:

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 12:34 pm
by wicked
I don't mind LSU coming back. 8)

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 12:35 pm
by LSU Tiger Josh
lol I would love to especially with my new knowledge, but alas I'm disqualified

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 12:43 pm
by wicked
yeah didn't figure that would happen, but hey worth a shot! :wink:

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 1:12 pm
by Serbia
wicked wrote:
Serbia wrote:Well I'm going to point a finger at Gimpy-Wicked, for dropping the hammer on MM without waiting for the roleclaim. Now I know this is a tough thing to blame on Wicked, except that it IS her role that did that. And yes, I know, the rest of us didn't get a roleclaim either, but Gimpy knew we were down to -1, and someone (forgot who) said we should wait, and he jumped right in... well anyway, that's my two cents.

here's another re-read gem. Gimpy specifically asked for a roleclaim and then waited before voting. At least he showed an iotum of thought there. :?
Now you KNOW also, unless you skimmed, that I immediately backtracked on that. Remember? Now I'll have to go find that quote too.

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 1:21 pm
by Serbia
I wrote that at 21:57, and wrote this at 22:18....
Serbia wrote:You know what, I went back and re-read, and reviewed the timestamps, and I have to retract what I said about Gimpy. Nag gave us a 5 and 3/4 hour deadline, and after 4 hours, Gimpy voted, saying he'd rather have a lynch then no lynch. So I retract it. Sorry all. :oops: (glad I didn't vote!)
Let's keep everything in context, shall we Wicked?

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 1:38 pm
by ga7
Yep, you did retract. But that doesn't change the fact you went straight away for an easy target :wink:

That sucks LSU :( (Unless Kalish is scum :lol: )

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 1:39 pm
by Serbia
If Kalish is scum, I'm screwed, cause he'll vote me off. He SHOULD vote off the GF, Exile. Hopefully whoever replaces isn't going to be fooled by Wicked's glorious play of another scum role here.

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 1:42 pm
by ga7
Oh my, I sure hope he isn't fooled by all the evidence including the cop one. :lol:

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 1:48 pm
by Serbia
The one thing we're all sure on is that Exile IS the GF. I'm questioning Willis's sanity. Remember, I'm THE MAYOR.

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 1:50 pm
by wicked
no we're not all sure of that. Serbs, if you have NEW clues or data to put forth, please do so, but at this time we're just treading water waiting for the replacement. Let's not give him 10 more pages to read, ok?

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 1:56 pm
by 0ojakeo0
ill replace

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 2:34 pm
by nagerous
Aimless 2.0 has replaced Kalishnikov.

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 2:37 pm
by Talapus
Geez....there are a lot of pagesz posted since I was in here last. Give me a few minutes to catch up and then I'll post something intelligent.

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 2:38 pm
by wicked
nagerous wrote:Aimless 2.0 has replaced Kalishnikov.
=D> \:D/ Thanks Aim!

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 2:40 pm
by nagerous
Suddenly, a fuse is heard going off and screams are heard. Talapus is then seen heading straight towards wicked. There is a huge explosion and when the smoke is cleared, both Talapus and wicked are found... dead


Talapus - King Bob-Omb (Terrorist) has blown up!

Image


The explosion killed wicked - Wario (Vigilante)


Image

With 7 now alive it takes 4 to lynch!

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 2:41 pm
by Talapus
*BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA....

Peace, I'm out :twisted:
*

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 2:45 pm
by 0ojakeo0
wicked go boom

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 2:47 pm
by wicked
Damn. That's twice now I've been terrorist-bombed in a game! Now THAT's a twist... good luck guys.