Moderator: Community Team
I might be mis-reading your post but I don't what was so remarkable about the case on soundman. Leehar voted soundman, clever voted soundman, soundman responds, clever unvotes, leehar responds to soundman,... and thats it.DoomYoshi wrote:I have caught up now. I need to churn some thoughts over in my head before I have anything to add.
The case on soundman is interesting. I have seen many inactive cases, but I have never seen such a response to one.
do you mean you actually plan on bringing subsance to the game any time soon?thehippo8 wrote:Ok, I'll give you all until Monday to start getting involved in this game or I'll lynch the lot of ya!! lol

Just because you're a VT doesn't mean you can't contribute. VT's are supposed to be aggressive because they're the meat bags of the game in the nightthehippo8 wrote:Ok, I'll give you all until Monday to start getting involved in this game or I'll lynch the lot of ya!! lol
What tracking information are you referring to?thehippo8 wrote:@ Leehar - yeah, at least two factions sounds right. I am very confused by neb's vt claim but tracker information. Maybe he's masoned with a tracker and has been passed information?
Day two is as hard as day 1. I agree that we are better off pressuring people and getting information at this stage. Frankly the idea of killing vt's for the sake of it is very scummie! In the end game vt's can prove valuable.
Anyway, for now I want to hear more from Neb. You see oddly silent in the face of votes and questions. If you carry on like that thenyou only end up attracting more attention to yourself so speak up or I will vote on you!
You can still consider whether my case has merit.everywhere116 wrote:I believe that sound said that he won't be able to post until Monday, so it's kind of a moot point anyway.
FOS Jonty for a terrible reason to vote me. How is this stopping the town from getting a lynch, when I then threw the hammer? Hmm?jonty125 wrote:Busdriver is most likely town. And mafia busdrivers are very rare as their quite powerful.Nebuchadnezer wrote: I believe the train man to be the bus driver(mafia, possibly third party).
You try a new case 15 hours before we get a lynch.Nebuchadnezer wrote:Call me a sheep...UNVOTE VOTE Freezie. A fresh set of eyes on 41 pages is going to pick up something that those of use who have been stuck in the back forth can't. I'm all for a new direction...Let's start with Freezie.pmchugh wrote:Ok f*ck this, got to page 41 and I am falling asleep. Blame the football.
But anyway, as of page 41 the scum are:
Freezie, everywhere, jonty and skillful. Any questions?
vote Neb for trying to stop town getting a lynch by throwing a new case into the mix right before deadline.
FOS Betiko for also coming up with fabricated reason(s) to vote me.betiko wrote:I don't see why the busdriver would be mafia; i think town or third party and that it was kind of a lucky thing. now this busdriver might know how was originally targeted by mafia; if it's the case that is someone that can be more or less cleared by the busdriver.Leehar wrote:So should he come forward and tell us who he saved, or irrelevant for know. I think he should keep close to his chest for now who was actually targetedjonty125 wrote:Busdriver is most likely town. And mafia busdrivers are very rare as their quite powerful.Nebuchadnezer wrote: I believe the train man to be the bus driver(mafia, possibly third party).
Skimming/Lost?MoB Deadly wrote: Freezie, although not the most active, is seen as a veteran on these forums, I can see why someone would want to attack him first.
If the victim was busdrove and freezie died, then it's obvious someone else was attacked instead?
And yes, i think that if we have these 2 night scenes, we probably have a serial killer. I think agent smith being a serial killer and then mafia being machines..
about the bus driver thing, i am really wondering if neb didn't drop a big tell. I think it's very possible that he is mafia and that he knew i was last night's target that got busdriven with freezie. after his VT claim I started trusting him and now I think I might have lowered my guard a bit too much.
This thing he said about me surviving the night is very scummy for a VT, and also his case on freezie at the very end of day 1.. come on, that was not serious!
vote neb
fastposted
Again...snowballing?MoB Deadly wrote:I think things are definitely snowballing for Neb.
1. As jonty said he attempted to start a new case at the end of the day with 5 claims already on the table
2. Possible scum slip
3. Hammered the lynch
4. I don't like how he put the focus on PMC after the lynch occurred. It seemed like he could have been trying to attract night actions to PMC.
-
5. He is a safe lynch because he is a VT.
I dont want to jump the gun and put my vote on him just yet. I am sure not all the players even saw the scene from last night yet, I would like to see if a stronger case presents itself before I put a vote on neb.
And finally...FOS everywhere for the blatant bandwagoning.everywhere116 wrote:Well this is sure a BLAM.skillfusniper33 wrote:Wow getting people confused, guess I should just give up for a little while, and double check my posts especially after getting a phone call while trying to post.jonty125 wrote:Erm here is is the sceneskillfusniper33 wrote:
Why would you assume freezie was the person bus drivenNight 1 Scene wrote:The train curiously deposits another man on the platform. Indifferent, the man in the dark suit shoots this other man and walks away.That was Neb.skillfusniper33 wrote:Along with the other posts of you trying to make a case very close to the deadline I think that deserves my vote for now.
FOS skill for being completely wrong on two points in his "case" on chuck.
unvote, for my idiotic posting.
Vote Neb for the reasons stated above/last page.
You must have a terrible short-term memory...I posted I would be gone these past two days...both in this thread and the "vacation" thread...please don't make up reasons to make me look "scummy."thehippo8 wrote:@ Leehar - yeah, at least two factions sounds right. I am very confused by neb's vt claim but tracker information. Maybe he's masoned with a tracker and has been passed information?
Day two is as hard as day 1. I agree that we are better off pressuring people and getting information at this stage. Frankly the idea of killing vt's for the sake of it is very scummie! In the end game vt's can prove valuable.
Anyway, for now I want to hear more from Neb. You see oddly silent in the face of votes and questions. If you carry on like that thenyou only end up attracting more attention to yourself so speak up or I will vote on you!
Seriously? Well thought out? I must totally not understand this game, if that is a "well thought out" case against me. I would actually like you, CLEVER, to point out the "well thought out" parts of the case on me, please.Some7hingCLEVER wrote:ok i like the case on neb it seems well thought out and all but. i just dont wana jump on a bandwagon yet this early in the day. so i think pressuring an inactive is a good idea and if no info comes from it i will vote for neb.vote soundman
I'm pointing out faulty arguments for trying to get me lynched. Had I been available to post, I would have stopped the nonsense earlier...however, I am free to defend myself, am I not? It's not OMGUS...it's calling people out for terrible reasons to vote me.Leehar wrote:Stop bringing a thousand and one omgus's up Neb, we've moved on after that was cleared up...
Your OMGUS on me was odd given I didn't even vote for you. All I said was can you get on and respond already. You'd been going away for 2 days but you seemed to have been away longer. At any rate, it doesn't matter about that cause you've now come back and are getting stuck back into things. Good for you, great to see! But why would you OMGUS me when all I was doing was saying speak up? Seems strange to me. And I have to agree with Leehar, you have gone a little overboard on all this nonsense. Never mind, there are bigger fish to fry.Nebuchadnezer wrote:I'm pointing out faulty arguments for trying to get me lynched. Had I been available to post, I would have stopped the nonsense earlier...however, I am free to defend myself, am I not? It's not OMGUS...it's calling people out for terrible reasons to vote me.Leehar wrote:Stop bringing a thousand and one omgus's up Neb, we've moved on after that was cleared up...
Sorry Chuck, I read this but then fell asleep and forgot all about it! The tracking information was ex the post by Nebuchadnezer on Fri May 04, 2012 6:17 am:thechuck51 wrote:What tracking information are you referring to?thehippo8 wrote:@ Leehar - yeah, at least two factions sounds right. I am very confused by neb's vt claim but tracker information. Maybe he's masoned with a tracker and has been passed information? ...
And is it just me or has Doom simply sidestepped the Soundman issue?Anyway...betiko lives.
Which just goes to show that we really are lost in confusion!MoB Deadly wrote:Leehar wrote:So should he come forward and tell us who he saved, or irrelevant for know. I think he should keep close to his chest for now who was actually targetedjonty125 wrote:Busdriver is most likely town. And mafia busdrivers are very rare as their quite powerful.Nebuchadnezer wrote: I believe the train man to be the bus driver(mafia, possibly third party).
Skimming/Lost?MoB Deadly wrote: Freezie, although not the most active, is seen as a veteran on these forums, I can see why someone would want to attack him first.
If the victim was busdrove and freezie died, then it's obvious someone else was attacked instead?
thehippo8 wrote:And is it just me or has Doom simply sidestepped the Soundman issue?
In any case, I don't understand what you mean about sidestepping the issue. Don't make me go all try hard and daddy on you.thehippo8 wrote:thehippo8 wrote:And is it just me or has Doom simply sidestepped the Soundman issue?
Sorry that line was supposed to be at the end - didn't see where the cursor was when I was typing and hit enter! Should remember to look at the screen!!
player a wrote:i will vote player b for being inactive
Soundman inactive case:player b wrote:i am sorry, I will try to post something, I have been following along but I don't have much to add
Leehar wrote:i will vote soundman for inactivity
clever wrote:me too
soundman wrote: what you talkin bout Willis? I am more active than most
clever wrote:true dat. Unvote
Leehar wrote:wtf? That is a lie
Vote soundman. Fos cleverdoom wrote:exactly. LAL.
LOL, this made me laugh. Though I agree, this case seems a bit odd to me. I love Clever. He's like Pinocchio, lead along by strings wishing to be a real boy. XD So, I'm going to give you this advice Clever. If you're going to agree with someone because they said something, and then agree with the opposite person because they said something else, it's going to draw heat. You never even bothered to look it up to decide if either was right or wrong.DoomYoshi wrote: Soundman inactive case:Leehar wrote:i will vote soundman for inactivityclever wrote:me toosoundman wrote: what you talkin bout Willis? I am more active than mostclever wrote:true dat. UnvoteLeehar wrote:wtf? That is a lieVote soundman. Fos cleverdoom wrote:exactly. LAL.

