Conquer Club

rishaed wrote:

DoomYoshi wrote:Vote Count

Army of GOD (1) - StorrZerg
rishaed (3) - Army of GOD, dd515087, mtamburini L-3
mtamburini (2) - Iron Butterfly, virus90

With 10 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.

Also pretty sure my votes on mtamb. If not lets fix it. unvote Vote Mtamburini

Lmao I was just looong at that too and tried finishing where you unvoted

DD is either a complete idiot or really bad at playing as mafia. Not going to reply to that. But I don't like your posts (probably because you're deflecting cases on mtamb/aog onto the claimed doc but that's none of my business).

I have scum reads on:

AoG, mtamb and DD. I used to have one on IB but both wing and HS flipping town really screwed with me.

Mtamb has annoyed me all game with his lack of giving a crap when asked something and I finally get a chance to say "screw you, claim!". vote mtamb. I think rishead has been playing well and I've understood every single one of his votes.

I have townie reads on:

Strikewolf, IB (barely but I do), Mets, virus and rishead.

how is it that i think no one is defending or town reading AoG

And more than half the players in the game scum read him, yet i hold the only vote on him.

StorrZerg wrote:how is it that i think no one is defending or town reading AoG

And more than half the players in the game scum read him, yet i hold the only vote on him.

I think mtamb' claim would be more of a discussion maker. Game's been getting pretty dead. I'd be ok with an AoG lynch but I think mtamb needs to claim, then we see if he is worth lynching. AoG is plan B in my mind.

So what's you reason for aog lynch then?

NoSurvivors wrote:

StorrZerg wrote:how is it that i think no one is defending or town reading AoG

And more than half the players in the game scum read him, yet i hold the only vote on him.

I think mtamb' claim would be more of a discussion maker. Game's been getting pretty dead. I'd be ok with an AoG lynch but I think mtamb needs to claim, then we see if he is worth lynching. AoG is plan B in my mind.

Then all you are doing is rolefishing and just basing your read on whether or not you like my role which is honestly retarded

StorrZerg wrote:how is it that i think no one is defending or town reading AoG

And more than half the players in the game scum read him, yet i hold the only vote on him.

Agreed people are too scared to lynch someone who claims can only die by getting lynched THATS SO TOWNY OMGERD RT ME

MY suspicions of an assasin being in the game are considerably low right now since the start of the day, Im more inclined to see 2 scum teams so they will have to kill eachother in the night for any of them to survive.

Im almost comfortable claiming as it will explain why I wanted hotshot dead even more so after he claimed and why I wanted to lynch NOS very early in the day but then backed off.

Actually f*ck it ill just claim, Im the town Jailkeeper I can choose to save somone but they will also be roleblocked as well.

Having this information is how i concluded that If i can personally roleblock/save someone then there had to be an SK in the game based on the fact I could roleblock their ability to kill and also made me think that there could be 2 scum teams and 1 person from each team could be sending someone to make the kills.

Yeah sorry. I've been busy trying to keep up with the other game and with limited time over the weekend, I was reading along for the most part but not really able to post much.

As far as what Mtam said regarding his claim being the reason he thought as he did...the logic is a bit sketchy. A role blocker, Doctor and Jailkeeper all being in the same game is not that uncommon in a game this size, especially non-vanilla. A jailkeeper would be a likely addition in a game with two anti-town killers (or even just a mafia/SK and a vig) but doesn't prove any specific kind of killer or if the killers were unrelated.

Frankly, I could see two protective roles in this game after 3 deaths on night 1. I wouldn't even completely rule out 3. Assuming Rishaed is telling the truth though and I strongly feel he is there are probably two not including himself at most. Overall I am leaning slightly towards believing your claim right now and there is the option of testing it with IB. Not a fool proof option but the old you and IB both target player B. Player B dying would not prove that your role is fake but it would look bad for you. Player B living gives reasonable proof that you are telling the truth. The problem would come in with MTam lying and a mafia busdriver existing. If they could clinch end game that way or felt Mtam was screwed regardless than things could fall apart.

What I wanted to know from you Mtam (I stated the apparent knowledge in a few posts one of which you replied in part with your feelings towards Storr) is that early on you made it known that you knew there were 3rd party in the game. I wanted to know how, why and what you knew about third parties in the game.

strike wolf wrote:Yeah sorry. I've been busy trying to keep up with the other game and with limited time over the weekend, I was reading along for the most part but not really able to post much.

As far as what Mtam said regarding his claim being the reason he thought as he did...the logic is a bit sketchy. A role blocker, Doctor and Jailkeeper all being in the same game is not that uncommon in a game this size, especially non-vanilla. A jailkeeper would be a likely addition in a game with two anti-town killers (or even just a mafia/SK and a vig) but doesn't prove any specific kind of killer or if the killers were unrelated.

Frankly, I could see two protective roles in this game after 3 deaths on night 1. I wouldn't even completely rule out 3. Assuming Rishaed is telling the truth though and I strongly feel he is there are probably two not including himself at most. Overall I am leaning slightly towards believing your claim right now and there is the option of testing it with IB. Not a fool proof option but the old you and IB both target player B. Player B dying would not prove that your role is fake but it would look bad for you. Player B living gives reasonable proof that you are telling the truth. The problem would come in with MTam lying and a mafia busdriver existing. If they could clinch end game that way or felt Mtam was screwed regardless than things could fall apart.

What I wanted to know from you Mtam (I stated the apparent knowledge in a few posts one of which you replied in part with your feelings towards Storr) is that early on you made it known that you knew there were 3rd party in the game. I wanted to know how, why and what you knew about third parties in the game.

Strike could you please link that or let us know what page Mtam made that statement about third party.

I have played in games with jailkeeper, doc and blocker so not impossible.

Mtam who did you jail keep night one and why??

I would forget the obvious question. I guess we probably should get a name too.

mtamburini wrote:

strike wolf wrote:So hmmm...uhh....*twiddles thumbs* Random votes eh?

If you're mafia please raise your hand and if you're town raise your hand. AHA! We've identified all the third parties!

Anyways

Unvote Vote Streaker The mod told me that he stole my sweet roll.

Wait you know their are/is third parties in this game too?!?!

Highly suspect of strike "wolf"

But to more important news, apparently rng says wcg will not be playing towards his win condition so decides to vote himself.

vote wcg

Rng can be cruel game sorry it didn't work out for you.

Seems like it's pretty obviously a joke in the jokevote stage

It's possible but I don't really know Mtam to joke that much...other than faking a fight with Storr now and then.

Iron Butterfly wrote:

strike wolf wrote:Yeah sorry. I've been busy trying to keep up with the other game and with limited time over the weekend, I was reading along for the most part but not really able to post much.

As far as what Mtam said regarding his claim being the reason he thought as he did...the logic is a bit sketchy. A role blocker, Doctor and Jailkeeper all being in the same game is not that uncommon in a game this size, especially non-vanilla. A jailkeeper would be a likely addition in a game with two anti-town killers (or even just a mafia/SK and a vig) but doesn't prove any specific kind of killer or if the killers were unrelated.

Frankly, I could see two protective roles in this game after 3 deaths on night 1. I wouldn't even completely rule out 3. Assuming Rishaed is telling the truth though and I strongly feel he is there are probably two not including himself at most. Overall I am leaning slightly towards believing your claim right now and there is the option of testing it with IB. Not a fool proof option but the old you and IB both target player B. Player B dying would not prove that your role is fake but it would look bad for you. Player B living gives reasonable proof that you are telling the truth. The problem would come in with MTam lying and a mafia busdriver existing. If they could clinch end game that way or felt Mtam was screwed regardless than things could fall apart.

What I wanted to know from you Mtam (I stated the apparent knowledge in a few posts one of which you replied in part with your feelings towards Storr) is that early on you made it known that you knew there were 3rd party in the game. I wanted to know how, why and what you knew about third parties in the game.

Strike could you please link that or let us know what page Mtam made that statement about third party.

I have played in games with jailkeeper, doc and blocker so not impossible.

Mtam who did you jail keep night one and why??

Really? I put my action on NoS because I thought he was scum. At the time I would hope to catch him in a slip up but after some questions were answered about game semantics i immediately backed off.

mtamburini wrote:

Iron Butterfly wrote:

strike wolf wrote:Yeah sorry. I've been busy trying to keep up with the other game and with limited time over the weekend, I was reading along for the most part but not really able to post much.

As far as what Mtam said regarding his claim being the reason he thought as he did...the logic is a bit sketchy. A role blocker, Doctor and Jailkeeper all being in the same game is not that uncommon in a game this size, especially non-vanilla. A jailkeeper would be a likely addition in a game with two anti-town killers (or even just a mafia/SK and a vig) but doesn't prove any specific kind of killer or if the killers were unrelated.

Frankly, I could see two protective roles in this game after 3 deaths on night 1. I wouldn't even completely rule out 3. Assuming Rishaed is telling the truth though and I strongly feel he is there are probably two not including himself at most. Overall I am leaning slightly towards believing your claim right now and there is the option of testing it with IB. Not a fool proof option but the old you and IB both target player B. Player B dying would not prove that your role is fake but it would look bad for you. Player B living gives reasonable proof that you are telling the truth. The problem would come in with MTam lying and a mafia busdriver existing. If they could clinch end game that way or felt Mtam was screwed regardless than things could fall apart.

What I wanted to know from you Mtam (I stated the apparent knowledge in a few posts one of which you replied in part with your feelings towards Storr) is that early on you made it known that you knew there were 3rd party in the game. I wanted to know how, why and what you knew about third parties in the game.

Strike could you please link that or let us know what page Mtam made that statement about third party.

I have played in games with jailkeeper, doc and blocker so not impossible.

Mtam who did you jail keep night one and why??

Really? I put my action on NoS because I thought he was scum. At the time I would hope to catch him in a slip up but after some questions were answered about game semantics i immediately backed off.

How convenient that you blocked the person who we already know tried to save someone that wasn't going to die.

mtamburini wrote:Were lynching nos today end of story like f*ck 3 people die and he doesnt save any of them

Lol and LaL.

Vote Mtam

strike wolf wrote:

mtamburini wrote:Were lynching nos today end of story like f*ck 3 people die and he doesnt save any of them

Lol and LaL.

Vote Mtam

Lol holy shit I forgot about that post

vote mtam

strike wolf wrote:

mtamburini wrote:Were lynching nos today end of story like f*ck 3 people die and he doesnt save any of them

Lol and LaL.

Vote Mtam

Nice Catch Strike.

Metsfanmax wrote:

mtamburini wrote:

Iron Butterfly wrote:

strike wolf wrote:Yeah sorry. I've been busy trying to keep up with the other game and with limited time over the weekend, I was reading along for the most part but not really able to post much.

As far as what Mtam said regarding his claim being the reason he thought as he did...the logic is a bit sketchy. A role blocker, Doctor and Jailkeeper all being in the same game is not that uncommon in a game this size, especially non-vanilla. A jailkeeper would be a likely addition in a game with two anti-town killers (or even just a mafia/SK and a vig) but doesn't prove any specific kind of killer or if the killers were unrelated.

Frankly, I could see two protective roles in this game after 3 deaths on night 1. I wouldn't even completely rule out 3. Assuming Rishaed is telling the truth though and I strongly feel he is there are probably two not including himself at most. Overall I am leaning slightly towards believing your claim right now and there is the option of testing it with IB. Not a fool proof option but the old you and IB both target player B. Player B dying would not prove that your role is fake but it would look bad for you. Player B living gives reasonable proof that you are telling the truth. The problem would come in with MTam lying and a mafia busdriver existing. If they could clinch end game that way or felt Mtam was screwed regardless than things could fall apart.

What I wanted to know from you Mtam (I stated the apparent knowledge in a few posts one of which you replied in part with your feelings towards Storr) is that early on you made it known that you knew there were 3rd party in the game. I wanted to know how, why and what you knew about third parties in the game.

Strike could you please link that or let us know what page Mtam made that statement about third party.

I have played in games with jailkeeper, doc and blocker so not impossible.

Mtam who did you jail keep night one and why??

Really? I put my action on NoS because I thought he was scum. At the time I would hope to catch him in a slip up but after some questions were answered about game semantics i immediately backed off.

How convenient that you blocked the person who we already know tried to save someone that wasn't going to die.

Do you even read?

strike wolf wrote:

mtamburini wrote:Were lynching nos today end of story like f*ck 3 people die and he doesnt save any of them

Lol and LaL.

Vote Mtam

I used my action as an ROLEBLOCK more than a SAVE hence why I used it on the most scummiest person

Seems like thats enough votes, Town lost gg

My predictions scum team of strike and DD and scum team 2 Mets + unknown

stor actually SK and got away with it

Those late hammers pretty much sealed it, aog probably town rishead unfortunately probably town

strike wolf wrote:

mtamburini wrote:Were lynching nos today end of story like f*ck 3 people die and he doesnt save any of them

Lol and LaL.

Vote Mtam

This post was also under the assumption that he was notified he was blocked and that he would not be able to make an action

I was told the action would only be blocked if the action was succesfful hence why i backed off