Civil War Day 7. UNION WINS!!!!! Thanks 2 ALL 4 PLAYING

ga7 · Post by **ga7** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 6:10 pm

Neut, I'm not particularly trying to get you killed, but when I saw your post I thought it could well be a slip up. Your defense doesn't convince me, and Nag explained it well. At that time, all I was trying to do was to prevent more union from getting lynched by directing the attention to the natives, while not doing shit to backup my intent

Unfortunately the natives took it personal, which seemed weird to me

Right now I'm just trying to get the game moving in a more mafia-looking direction than people randomly claiming, other people randomly bandwagonning, rinse and repeat.
That said, I still have a FOS on you but I'm gonna Unkill Kill AD because frankly, I don't think any confed/union would have claimed union on day 1 to look for protection and then when the wind starts to blow the other way conveniently change their alignment.

Russianfire8371 · Post by **Russianfire8371** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 6:11 pm

ga7 wrote:You guys are morons. No 3rd party in their right mind would follow this wagon, and you won't get a majority with just the confeds. Add to that the fact there's still a day-vig on union's side and the confed day-vig died, and that you'll probably have to suffer the consequences of your all-out action tonight, this was really an awful move, regardless of what Huck really is. Way to waste an advantage

We can always hope that Huck is the day-vig. I had another thought though. I dont think he said that because he didnt want to kill one of his mates. I think it might be more of a "I need to balance the game out so I have a shot at winning". He's either union or a 3rd party. One way to find out

KILL HUCK

Huckleberryhound · Post by **Huckleberryhound** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 6:20 pm

Russianfire8371 wrote:
ga7 wrote:You guys are morons. No 3rd party in their right mind would follow this wagon, and you won't get a majority with just the confeds. Add to that the fact there's still a day-vig on union's side and the confed day-vig died, and that you'll probably have to suffer the consequences of your all-out action tonight, this was really an awful move, regardless of what Huck really is. Way to waste an advantage
We can always hope that Huck is the day-vig. I had another thought though. I dont think he said that because he didnt want to kill one of his mates. I think it might be more of a "I need to balance the game out so I have a shot at winning". He's either union or a 3rd party. One way to find out

KILL HUCK

You want to kill me to...."find out".

Two things....1, you must be confed. 2, hoping is not a very good reason to vote.

Koesen · Post by **Koesen** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 6:26 pm

Unkill
Kill Anark

Having thought it over, I am beginning to lean to the point of view that Anark is a clever third party guy who indeed secured protection by the Union doc with an early fake claim. Your Union claim and your HBH vote don't match.

Russianfire8371 · Post by **Russianfire8371** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 6:29 pm

Huckleberryhound wrote:
Russianfire8371 wrote:
ga7 wrote:You guys are morons. No 3rd party in their right mind would follow this wagon, and you won't get a majority with just the confeds. Add to that the fact there's still a day-vig on union's side and the confed day-vig died, and that you'll probably have to suffer the consequences of your all-out action tonight, this was really an awful move, regardless of what Huck really is. Way to waste an advantage
We can always hope that Huck is the day-vig. I had another thought though. I dont think he said that because he didnt want to kill one of his mates. I think it might be more of a "I need to balance the game out so I have a shot at winning". He's either union or a 3rd party. One way to find out

KILL HUCK
You want to kill me to...."find out".

Two things....1, you must be confed. 2, hoping is not a very good reason to vote.

ha hoping? I personally think that if your the SK than it would make our lives easier by not havign to worry about him anymore. And i than you did a horrible job f your union, then lets hope that your the vig. If your confed, you sure did screw up bad.

Huckleberryhound · Post by **Huckleberryhound** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 6:40 pm

Russianfire8371 wrote:
Huckleberryhound wrote:
Russianfire8371 wrote:
ga7 wrote:You guys are morons. No 3rd party in their right mind would follow this wagon, and you won't get a majority with just the confeds. Add to that the fact there's still a day-vig on union's side and the confed day-vig died, and that you'll probably have to suffer the consequences of your all-out action tonight, this was really an awful move, regardless of what Huck really is. Way to waste an advantage
We can always hope that Huck is the day-vig. I had another thought though. I dont think he said that because he didnt want to kill one of his mates. I think it might be more of a "I need to balance the game out so I have a shot at winning". He's either union or a 3rd party. One way to find out

KILL HUCK
You want to kill me to...."find out".

Two things....1, you must be confed. 2, hoping is not a very good reason to vote.
ha hoping? I personally think that if your the SK than it would make our lives easier by not havign to worry about him anymore. And i than you did a horrible job f your union, then lets hope that your the vig. If your confed, you sure did screw up bad.

Do you have any basis of fact to think i'm an SK ?

Russianfire8371 · Post by **Russianfire8371** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:14 pm

Huckleberryhound wrote:
Russianfire8371 wrote:
Huckleberryhound wrote:
Russianfire8371 wrote:
ga7 wrote:You guys are morons. No 3rd party in their right mind would follow this wagon, and you won't get a majority with just the confeds. Add to that the fact there's still a day-vig on union's side and the confed day-vig died, and that you'll probably have to suffer the consequences of your all-out action tonight, this was really an awful move, regardless of what Huck really is. Way to waste an advantage
We can always hope that Huck is the day-vig. I had another thought though. I dont think he said that because he didnt want to kill one of his mates. I think it might be more of a "I need to balance the game out so I have a shot at winning". He's either union or a 3rd party. One way to find out

KILL HUCK
You want to kill me to...."find out".

Two things....1, you must be confed. 2, hoping is not a very good reason to vote.
ha hoping? I personally think that if your the SK than it would make our lives easier by not havign to worry about him anymore. And i than you did a horrible job f your union, then lets hope that your the vig. If your confed, you sure did screw up bad.
Do you have any basis of fact to think i'm an SK ?

Are you saying that your union?

Huckleberryhound · Post by **Huckleberryhound** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:26 pm

No proof whatsoever, just what i thought.

Hitman079 · Post by **Hitman079** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:46 pm

graahhh which bandwagon should i jump on?

Hitman079 · Post by **Hitman079** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:47 pm

but seriously, why is everyone jumping on huckleberry all of a sudden? he made one allusion [?] to his role (or it was a joke), but that evidence isn't solid enough to lynch (kill) his ass.

Russianfire8371 · Post by **Russianfire8371** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 8:07 pm

Huckleberryhound wrote:No proof whatsoever, just what i thought.

Why are you avoiding the question. That should be proof that you have a very important role taht you dont want to give up (either a powerful union role or a high 3rd party role, possibly SK).

Huckleberryhound · Post by **Huckleberryhound** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 8:16 pm

Russianfire8371 wrote:
Huckleberryhound wrote:No proof whatsoever, just what i thought.
Why are you avoiding the question. That should be proof that you have a very important role taht you dont want to give up (either a powerful union role or a high 3rd party role, possibly SK).

What are you ?

magneticgoop · Post by **magneticgoop** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 8:26 pm

russian you are a moron there is only one small hint that he is union which hound says is a joke. leave him alone and quit fishing

unkill kill ad i never noticed the incongruous claim that he is union and then votes to kill one

very shifty

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 8:34 pm

magneticgoop wrote:russian you are a moron there is only one small hint that he is union which hound says is a joke. leave him alone and quit fishing

unkill kill ad i never noticed the incongruous claim that he is union and then votes to kill one very shifty

I was wondering how long it would take someone to kill me.

This game is taking far too much of my time. I thought I'd have some fun and set some funny shit up with it.

LSU Tiger Josh · Post by **LSU Tiger Josh** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 8:35 pm

Vote Count 13 to lynch

Russian you failed to unvote before voting AD.
33. Huck Hound/cena-rules 6 (Spurgistan, Exile, Syzygy, Minister Masket, AD, Dominationnation)
3. AnarkistsDream 5 (Huck Hound, Gimpy, GA7, Koesen, Magneticgoop)
14. Dustn/Duday53 1 (Russian)
1. Jake 2.0/Xen Cobra
2. Serbia
5. The1Exile
6. Kwanton
7. Russianfire8371/Dwight
10. Talapus
11. Nagerous
12. Koesen
13. Hitman079
18.Magneticgoop 2.0/The Weird One
19. Skoffin
20. Neutrino
21. Spurgistan
22. GimpyThewonder
23. SheepofDumb
24. GA7 2.0/JND/Vudure
26. Syzygy
28. Minister Masket
30. Fircoal 2.0/Willis
32. dominationnation

Spent bullets (Limit of 6)
1. Jake 2.0/Xen Cobra 1 (Neutrino)
2. Serbia
3. AnarkistsDream 2 (Dustn, Huck Hound)
5. The1Exile 1 (Huck Hound)
6. Kwanton 1 (Huck Hound)
7. Russianfire8371/Dwight 1 (Dustn)
10. Talapus
11. Nagerous
12. Koesen 3 (Nag, Dustn, AD)
13. Hitman079
14. Dustn/Duday53
18.Magneticgoop 2.0/The Weird One 2 (Dustn, AD)
19. Skoffin
20. Neutrino
21. Spurgistan 1 (Huck Hound)
22. GimpyThewonder 1 (AD)
23. SheepofDumb
24. GA7 2.0/JND/Vudure 2 (Nag, AD)
26. Syzygy 2 (Dustn, Huck Hound)
28. Minister Masket 1 (Huck Hound)
30. Fircoal 2.0/Willis
32. dominationnation 2 (Dustn, Huck Hound)
33. Huck Hound/cena-rules 2 (Dustn, AD)

Russianfire8371 · Post by **Russianfire8371** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 8:36 pm

Huckleberryhound wrote:
Russianfire8371 wrote:
Huckleberryhound wrote:No proof whatsoever, just what i thought.
Why are you avoiding the question. That should be proof that you have a very important role taht you dont want to give up (either a powerful union role or a high 3rd party role, possibly SK).
What are you ?

again avoiding my question.

MG- I had already mentioned that AD's role claim was suspicious from the start, and i think his kill proves it. I just wish i had noticed his kill earlier

unkill kill AD More evidence against him than on Huck though i still point a big FOS on him

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 8:37 pm

Oh cool... More votes.

Okay...

I'm the Confederate Roleblocker...

If you kill me, you lose a valuable person... I have been blocking people successfully the past two nights, and can continue...

If you are Union or Non-Confed third party, then vote me...

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 8:42 pm

In any case, I'm going to bed... I'll post after class tomorrow.

Peace.

magneticgoop · Post by **magneticgoop** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 8:45 pm

AK may be some kind of jester i am keeping my vote on him for lack of a better target

Russianfire8371 · Post by **Russianfire8371** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 8:50 pm

Anarkistsdream wrote:Oh cool... More votes.

Okay...

I'm the Confederate Roleblocker...

If you kill me, you lose a valuable person... I have been blocking people successfully the past two nights, and can continue...

If you are Union or Non-Confed third party, then vote me...

how do you know that you successfully blocked people?

ga7 · Post by **ga7** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 9:40 pm

The only way he'd know is if there was less kills or something, I think he's just BSing us

If you really were confed, why take the risk on day 1 to be killed by your own camp? I was way surprised no one NKed you already, but that's a bit too much to take.

Koesen · Post by **Koesen** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 9:40 pm

Anarkistsdream wrote:Oh cool... More votes.

Okay...

I'm the Confederate Roleblocker...

If you kill me, you lose a valuable person... I have been blocking people successfully the past two nights, and can continue...

If you are Union or Non-Confed third party, then vote me...

Is there a name with that claim?

Talapus · Post by **Talapus** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 9:52 pm

Koesen wrote:
Anarkistsdream wrote:Oh cool... More votes.

Okay...

I'm the Confederate Roleblocker...

If you kill me, you lose a valuable person... I have been blocking people successfully the past two nights, and can continue...

If you are Union or Non-Confed third party, then vote me...
Is there a name with that claim?

Even if there was, it wouldn't be easy to prove or disprove...that's what makes this decision hard .

dustn64 · Post by **dustn64** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 9:58 pm

holy shit this game moves quick, Im not sure which way to go yet...

Russianfire8371 · Post by **Russianfire8371** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 10:52 pm

i havent in any mafia game ive played, gotten any hints or anything that told me that when i wanted to save someone or roleblock someone, that that person was actually targeted for something.

[size=0]me good with grammer![/size]