Civil War Day 7. UNION WINS!!!!! Thanks 2 ALL 4 PLAYING

spurgistan · Post by **spurgistan** » Mon Sep 17, 2007 2:24 pm

Huckleberryhound wrote:vote spurgstein

Yank

me freaking yesterday wrote:Not as Jewish though, I'm Episcopalian.

Russianfire8371 · Post by **Russianfire8371** » Mon Sep 17, 2007 3:28 pm

is it just me or has the SKs just targeted Confeds?

vote Spurgstein. British could never be trusted

Minister Masket · Post by **Minister Masket** » Mon Sep 17, 2007 4:40 pm

VFBTG
Damn, I felt my role would be completely safe. I underestimated the power of randomness. Looks like that was how I was killed.
Ah well, looks like I'll be missing my appointment with the President at the theatre.

0ojakeo0 · Post by **0ojakeo0** » Mon Sep 17, 2007 4:51 pm

vote spugastanmaybe u can kill

Serbia · Post by **Serbia** » Mon Sep 17, 2007 9:01 pm

KILL: HBH

Number one, we've got to write kill. Number two, I still think it's rather convient for all you "confederates" to claim, and go after a known Union member.

kwanton · Post by **kwanton** » Mon Sep 17, 2007 9:29 pm

Serbia wrote:KILL: HBH

Number one, we've got to write kill. Number two, I still think it's rather convient for all you "confederates" to claim, and go after a known Union member.

If they really are confed members who are effectively claiming, I'm wondering how the confed side is winning with such stupid members. I'm guessing that at least one or two of the is just pretending and trying to look like a confederate in hopes of skating to the endgame. Keep a lookout on the people who voted early for spurg cuz those are the people we have to worry about that are trying to trick us.

Hitman079 · Post by **Hitman079** » Mon Sep 17, 2007 9:37 pm

hmm...if there's an england there must be other european countries to- as you said spain, and i'm pretty sure france was in the revolutionary war, so they could've helped out in the civil war also

Russianfire8371 · Post by **Russianfire8371** » Mon Sep 17, 2007 10:20 pm

kwanton wrote:
Serbia wrote:KILL: HBH

Number one, we've got to write kill. Number two, I still think it's rather convient for all you "confederates" to claim, and go after a known Union member.
If they really are confed members who are effectively claiming, I'm wondering how the confed side is winning with such stupid members. I'm guessing that at least one or two of the is just pretending and trying to look like a confederate in hopes of skating to the endgame. Keep a lookout on the people who voted early for spurg cuz those are the people we have to worry about that are trying to trick us.

hmm im wondering how exactly you can say that without claiming yourselves. Also, the exact same thing can said about you 2 also. You all not only claimed, but said that we could be the natives, which could be a plot for either of you to protect yourselves.

As for my kill for Spugastan? The union has lost many members, and many powerful roles. Stats wise, they have to be running out of power roles. As for Spugastan, he's a 3rd party role thats been converted to the union. Yes, we have natives running around and killing. Yes, they could be lying about their alliance (given that they've actually "sided"). But we have an easy target and an easy kill that might have a power role.

As for Huck, he's still suspicious to me for avoding to roleclaim FOS HUCK

Russianfire8371 · Post by **Russianfire8371** » Mon Sep 17, 2007 10:39 pm

After rereading some of the posts, im still wondering baout Huck's role

He has played a very sketchy game. He made an allusion that he's union which he later called off as a joke once people started to kill him. After being questioned for a roleclaim, he would'nt answer even though a million confeds has voted to kill him (i honestly think if my people were out to kill me, that i would tell them its me). Then I came across this little quote on page 56

Huck wrote:Considering how dumb the sides are here, and the fact that i can't be nightkilled, i don't mind roleclaiming in the slightest Razz

If you want me to , just ask.

He's bandwagoned on the Dustn kill and now on the Spurgiton kill.

After the "roleclaim" he's been playing a confed game.

comments?

unkill kill HBH

[/quote]

Russianfire8371 · Post by **Russianfire8371** » Mon Sep 17, 2007 10:40 pm

unkill kill Spug

I didnt mean for that kill. I was going to origionally until i did some research. Sorry about the mistake

ga7 · Post by **ga7** » Mon Sep 17, 2007 10:56 pm

Kill Nark because lynch all liars. Preferably confed.

Hitman079 · Post by **Hitman079** » Mon Sep 17, 2007 10:59 pm

oh, LSU, please kill me in a day battle

Huckleberryhound · Post by **Huckleberryhound** » Mon Sep 17, 2007 11:17 pm

kill spurgistan

Huckleberryhound · Post by **Huckleberryhound** » Mon Sep 17, 2007 11:17 pm

Because i wrote vote last time

Syzygy · Post by **Syzygy** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 6:35 am

Kill HBH because somebody who can't be nightkilled makes me think godfather of sorts.

ga7 · Post by **ga7** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 6:53 am

Err so you're claiming vig Syzygy?

Anyway, HBH is indeed sketchy always following the faction in force. First he slips up hoping union wouldn't get killed, then votes for an obvious new union. Could well be third party this time as I really don't see him as confed after his slip up.
On a side note, I wonder why we're not getting day kills

Syzygy · Post by **Syzygy** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 12:17 pm

ga7 wrote:Err so you're claiming vig Syzygy?

Anyway, HBH is indeed sketchy always following the faction in force. First he slips up hoping union wouldn't get killed, then votes for an obvious new union. Could well be third party this time as I really don't see him as confed after his slip up.
On a side note, I wonder why we're not getting day kills

Hell no. There was a post earlier on (about 2-4 pages back?) mentioning his immunity to night kills.

Please look for it yourself, I'm lazy.

ga7 · Post by **ga7** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 12:36 pm

Duh, completely missed that. Ok, HBH does sound good today. He practically claimed he's not on either side too and I don't think the useful third parties could be bulletproof.
Unkill Kill HBH

magneticgoop · Post by **magneticgoop** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 5:50 pm

ga7 wrote:Kill Nark because lynch all liars. Preferably confed.

i agree how has he survived this long by claiming union and confed

you guys let him slip past a lynch every day somehow.

now here are reasons to vote him regardless of alignment

union-he claimed confed and union could be third party

confed-he claimed confed and union could be third party

natives-he claimed confed and union

independent-he claimed confed and union

other/3rd party-he claimed confed and union

at this point anyone that votes for him would not get blamed for being one side or another. unless you know he is on your side why not vote him
kill Nark

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 5:56 pm

Because we are winning...

And this basically proves you are not Confed...

But these players know to trust me... There is only so far I bullshit.

gimpyThewonder · Post by **gimpyThewonder** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 6:18 pm

Anarkistsdream wrote:Because we are winning...

And this basically proves you are not Confed...

But these players know to trust me... There is only so far I bullshit.

really? because i don't trust you in the slightest. I think your part of the native group and need to die.

kill AD

magneticgoop · Post by **magneticgoop** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 6:26 pm

gimpyThewonder wrote:
Anarkistsdream wrote:Because we are winning...

And this basically proves you are not Confed...

But these players know to trust me... There is only so far I bullshit.
really? because i don't trust you in the slightest. I think your part of the native group and need to die.

kill AD

why should we trust you when you claim both sides

spurgistan · Post by **spurgistan** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 6:47 pm

Kill: Huck. If we can't kill you at night, I guess we'd better kill you during the day.[/b]

Huckleberryhound · Post by **Huckleberryhound** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 6:54 pm

spurgistan wrote:Kill: Huck. If we can't kill you at night, I guess we'd better kill you during the day.[/b]

I don't even jknow what OMGUS measns, but i tis usually used in situations like this

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 7:11 pm

Huckleberryhound wrote:
spurgistan wrote:Kill: Huck. If we can't kill you at night, I guess we'd better kill you during the day.[/b]
I don't even jknow what OMGUS measns, but i tis usually used in situations like this

Problem is, Spurg is right... And I already voted you like this yesterday, but no one agreed.