Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
https://conquerclub.com/forum/
seriously? source?Phatscotty wrote:Ron Paul to announce 2012 presidential run tomorrow on Colbert show!
I got em. meet me here tomorrow at exactly 8 pm CST, and make sure nobody follows you.john9blue wrote:seriously? source?Phatscotty wrote:Ron Paul to announce 2012 presidential run tomorrow on Colbert show!
i don't think i would touch him with a dildo either, but i would definitely consider voting for himBigBallinStalin wrote:I wouldn't touch Ron Paul with even a 24 inch dildo.
Just don't give him none of that Pony business, ya hear?john9blue wrote:i don't think i would touch him with a dildo either, but i would definitely consider voting for himBigBallinStalin wrote:I wouldn't touch Ron Paul with even a 24 inch dildo.
Yeah, the lists "People I'd Want To Touch with a 24-inch Dildo" and "People I'd Want to Be President of the US" have about zero names in common.john9blue wrote:i don't think i would touch him with a dildo either, but i would definitely consider voting for himBigBallinStalin wrote:I wouldn't touch Ron Paul with even a 24 inch dildo.
You shoulda seen it coming...spurgistan wrote:Yeah, the lists "People I'd Want To Touch with a 24-inch Dildo" and "People I'd Want to Be President of the US" have about zero names in common.john9blue wrote:i don't think i would touch him with a dildo either, but i would definitely consider voting for himBigBallinStalin wrote:I wouldn't touch Ron Paul with even a 24 inch dildo.
Also, 24? That's just completely impractical, to say nothing of gratuitous.
But you would let him touch you...BigBallinStalin wrote:I wouldn't touch Ron Paul with even a 24 inch dildo.
Don't be so sure. I think people are starting to wake up. Liberty Defined could be a game changer.jay_a2j wrote:Voted for him in the '08 primaries.... sent money in to his campaign.... realized after the election he nor anyone like him will ever win the presidency..... EVER.
yet you hold the key in your hand. Paul can win, and the key is people like you going to your primary or caucus and writing his name down. Ron Paul won a couple states in 2008 and came in second place in even more states. Realize that was the steam that leads to a 2012 win.jay_a2j wrote:Voted for him in the '08 primaries.... sent money in to his campaign.... realized after the election he nor anyone like him will ever win the presidency..... EVER.
Well said. When people's wallet's start feeling the stress, watch out, because it won't be long before people realize that Ron Paul has been right all long. They laughed in early 2008 when he said in a debate a crash was coming...They laughed when he warned of hyperinflation.yodermk wrote:Don't be so sure. I think people are starting to wake up. Liberty Defined could be a game changer.jay_a2j wrote:Voted for him in the '08 primaries.... sent money in to his campaign.... realized after the election he nor anyone like him will ever win the presidency..... EVER.
Also we're going to start seeing the beginnings of hyperinflation in the not too distant future I think. That's going to drive the nail in the coffin of traditional thinking.
Still an uphill battle, but don't rule it out.
It certainly wouldn't be the world's reserve currency... oh wait.Timminz wrote:Just imagine how much the USD would be worth if banks weren't allowed to loan out money they don't have.
Well, now you guys are getting into fractional reserving. there is a world of difference between a bank that lends out 60% of its holding value as opposed to our current day banks that lend out 95% of their holdings.thegreekdog wrote:It certainly wouldn't be the world's reserve currency... oh wait.Timminz wrote:Just imagine how much the USD would be worth if banks weren't allowed to loan out money they don't have.
I think you need to check out today's drudge report headline.Phatscotty wrote:Well, now you guys are getting into fractional reserving. there is a world of difference between a bank that lends out 60% of its holding value as opposed to our current day banks that lend out 95% of their holdings.thegreekdog wrote:It certainly wouldn't be the world's reserve currency... oh wait.Timminz wrote:Just imagine how much the USD would be worth if banks weren't allowed to loan out money they don't have.
It truly is a case of cheap and easy money versus strong. To see the consequences of cheap money policies, just look at anything priced in dollars today.
Heard about it this morning. You guys can talk about that, but what I am referring to is the time America was on a gold standard, and did not loan out money they did not have. We had an industrial and communication and energy revolution with 0% inflation. All I wanted to say.thegreekdog wrote:I think you need to check out today's drudge report headline.Phatscotty wrote:Well, now you guys are getting into fractional reserving. there is a world of difference between a bank that lends out 60% of its holding value as opposed to our current day banks that lend out 95% of their holdings.thegreekdog wrote:It certainly wouldn't be the world's reserve currency... oh wait.Timminz wrote:Just imagine how much the USD would be worth if banks weren't allowed to loan out money they don't have.
It truly is a case of cheap and easy money versus strong. To see the consequences of cheap money policies, just look at anything priced in dollars today.
There was never a time where American banks did not use fractional reserve styles of banking. Even when money was simply a receipt from the local gold depository, there were more promisary notes (backed with gold), than there was actual gold.Phatscotty wrote:Heard about it this morning. You guys can talk about that, but what I am referring to is the time America was on a gold standard, and did not loan out money they did not have. We had an industrial and communication and energy revolution with 0% inflation. All I wanted to say.thegreekdog wrote:I think you need to check out today's drudge report headline.Phatscotty wrote:Well, now you guys are getting into fractional reserving. there is a world of difference between a bank that lends out 60% of its holding value as opposed to our current day banks that lend out 95% of their holdings.thegreekdog wrote:It certainly wouldn't be the world's reserve currency... oh wait.Timminz wrote:Just imagine how much the USD would be worth if banks weren't allowed to loan out money they don't have.
It truly is a case of cheap and easy money versus strong. To see the consequences of cheap money policies, just look at anything priced in dollars today.