Conquer Club

supposing the data is accurate I would say this is almost concrete case of secret diplomacy. These guys need to separated and not allowed to play in each other games.

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... hilit=jake

These two have already been accused. And as stated by me there,

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... hilit=jake

He has already been reported for secret diplomacy before.

Fuzzylogic99 wrote:supposing the data is accurate I would say this is almost concrete case of secret diplomacy. These guys need to separated and not allowed to play in each other games.

As much as I hate to say it, its still not enough evidence for the mods to give any warnings or blocks, as they want 5 or more cases in which it is happening.



More than likely he will be cleared, yet again.

Just foe him, and keep away from games with him in it.

This report is just a repeat of this report but with 2 added games. You provided the number of attacks that bunyan82 did on the other players in 3 games and since his attacks were not "very equal" with everyone in the game, then it means he is in a secret alliance with the player he attacked the least? One player's actions already means there is something fishy going on between two players? Based on the 3 games you provided, are we concluding that bunyan82 is there to serve jakethesnake2476 because he goes after the other opponents and avoids him? Ironically, it just so happens that bunyan82 actually won 2 out of them.

Still, I am not going to clear this but I am going to note it for future reference in case they get reported again by other people.

I see...5 or more cases...thanks for taking another quick look.....