Die Humanity Die's avatar
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 4:59 am
Just look. Actually, don't look unless you have to.
Conquer Club
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
https://conquerclub.com/forum/
Die Humanity Die's avatar
Page 1 of 6
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 5:02 am
Agreed. Totally Not Right What so Ever.
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 5:29 am
yeck... thats ugly....
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/profil ... e&u=131071 (is his profile i reckoment not to look...)
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/profil ... e&u=131071 (is his profile i reckoment not to look...)
lol
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 1:08 pm
nasty
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 2:29 pm
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 2:35 pm
I say let the sadists live.
Funny how this isnt allowed but cena-rules' avatar of a guy lighting himself on fire "accidentally" (an accurate representation of the user btw) is.
Funny how this isnt allowed but cena-rules' avatar of a guy lighting himself on fire "accidentally" (an accurate representation of the user btw) is.
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 2:43 pm
yes but ine is a stickman so its allowed. If it bothers you that much start a threadunriggable wrote:I say let the sadists live.
Funny how this isnt allowed but cena-rules' avatar of a guy lighting himself on fire "accidentally" (an accurate representation of the user btw) is.
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 2:45 pm
thats not even that offensiveunriggable wrote:I say let the sadists live.
Funny how this isnt allowed but cena-rules' avatar of a guy lighting himself on fire "accidentally" (an accurate representation of the user btw) is.
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 3:10 pm
misterman10 wrote:
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:01 pm
Is something going to be done about it or do we just need to set up to not see his posts?
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:30 pm
How is it offensive? Sure, I don't want to look at it, but that doesn't mean it's offensive. Besides, I think I saw a thread that said he was leaving. 
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:34 pm
Does that mean I can set a pair of boobs as my avatar, or perhaps a large penis, or other uncovered genitalia?wicked wrote:How is it offensive? Sure, I don't want to look at it, but that doesn't mean it's offensive. Besides, I think I saw a thread that said he was leaving.
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:35 pm
you know the answer to that.
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:37 pm
To be fully honest with you, no I don't.wicked wrote:you know the answer to that.
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:42 pm
So you're not honest at any other time?hecter wrote:To be fully honest with you, no I don't.
Pornographic avatars (i.e. those involving nudity) are not allowed. So no bare breasts or other genitalia. If you wouldn't post it in the forum, don't use it as an avatar.
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:43 pm
Does that mean I can go around posting that picture whenever I please, assuming that I don't highjack the thread, or go off topic?wicked wrote:So you're not honest at any other time?hecter wrote:To be fully honest with you, no I don't.
Pornographic avatars (i.e. those involving nudity) are not allowed. So no bare breasts or other genitalia. If you wouldn't post it in the forum, don't use it as an avatar.
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:44 pm
But we can have all the horrifically mutilated human beings we want?
I'd say a pornography ban should be an extreme gore/violence ban as well.
I'd say a pornography ban should be an extreme gore/violence ban as well.
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:50 pm
Wouldn't that count as pornography as well? I mean, it IS somebodies... naughty bits... Though, I must say, it's extreme gore/violence before it's pornography.Coleman wrote:But we can have all the horrifically mutilated human beings we want?
I'd say a pornography ban should be an extreme gore/violence ban as well.
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 9:49 pm
I'd say it IS pornography in that it is much more offensive than a pair of breasts.
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 9:08 am
how many young players we have here on CC??
its just sick
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 9:16 am
if flame subforum exists then i don't see why that avatar or any other avatars that contain violence or pornography shouldn't be allowed.
there are lots of young kids on CC that can much more easily be influenced by the flame forums than some guy's avatar.
i've seen people that have 90% of their posts in the flames. people that probably are too young to be allowed to use that kind of language in real life but find that section as a heaven where they can act like idiot and curse all they want. that does a lot more damage to a kids brain than a gross image he can easily find with a google search.
there are lots of young kids on CC that can much more easily be influenced by the flame forums than some guy's avatar.
i've seen people that have 90% of their posts in the flames. people that probably are too young to be allowed to use that kind of language in real life but find that section as a heaven where they can act like idiot and curse all they want. that does a lot more damage to a kids brain than a gross image he can easily find with a google search.
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 9:19 am
yeah ok i agree but why cant be just begin all by ourselfs and not use such avatars??? the world is sick enough so...DiM wrote:if flame subforum exists then i don't see why that avatar or any other avatars that contain violence or pornography shouldn't be allowed.
there are lots of young kids on CC that can much more easily be influenced by the flame forums than some guy's avatar.
i've seen people that have 90% of their posts in the flames. people that probably are too young to be allowed to use that kind of language in real life but find that section as a heaven where they can act like idiot and curse all they want. that does a lot more damage to a kids brain than a gross image he can easily find with a google search.
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 9:57 am
some people like to shock in a bad manner (violence, porn, explicit language). the reasons are very numerous and range frustration to low self esteem, from abuse as a child to pure meanness. and the internet provides a perfect place for them to do it. would diehumanitydie name his child like that? of course not. would he wear a t-shirt with that avatar imprinted. again a big no. would the users in the flame forum curse people in real life like that? another big no. the reasons why they wouldn't do that are simple. common sense or fear from parents or fear of getting a punch in the face.pascalleke wrote:yeah ok i agree but why cant be just begin all by ourselfs and not use such avatars??? the world is sick enough so...DiM wrote:if flame subforum exists then i don't see why that avatar or any other avatars that contain violence or pornography shouldn't be allowed.
there are lots of young kids on CC that can much more easily be influenced by the flame forums than some guy's avatar.
i've seen people that have 90% of their posts in the flames. people that probably are too young to be allowed to use that kind of language in real life but find that section as a heaven where they can act like idiot and curse all they want. that does a lot more damage to a kids brain than a gross image he can easily find with a google search.
so as long as CC encourages this kind of behavior (simply permitting it is an encouragement) people will do it. delete flame forum and start banning people with offensive avatars names signatures and people that curse and we'll have a better community.
but as long as flame forum is permitted i don't think diehumanitydie should be banned or warned. he simply puts a graphic example of what is spoken in flames.
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 10:14 am
I'd much rather look at boobs than that picture of someones head being half off... from my own point of view i don't want to be forced to look at that rather unpleasant picture.
Breasts on the other hand are natural (outside of California), beautiful and lest we forget, a great way to feed kids!
The more we hide them, the more young adolescents will want to see them and be confused by the suggestion of a nipple or the hint of a cleavage!
so i say everyone should get a pair on display for the good of young boys everywhere!
Breasts on the other hand are natural (outside of California), beautiful and lest we forget, a great way to feed kids!
The more we hide them, the more young adolescents will want to see them and be confused by the suggestion of a nipple or the hint of a cleavage!
so i say everyone should get a pair on display for the good of young boys everywhere!
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 10:33 am
hmm i know what you mean DiM.. but i have just checked and DHD has never actually posted in the Flame Forum. (only once in any other Forum)DiM wrote:some people like to shock in a bad manner (violence, porn, explicit language). the reasons are very numerous and range frustration to low self esteem, from abuse as a child to pure meanness. and the internet provides a perfect place for them to do it. would diehumanitydie name his child like that? of course not. would he wear a t-shirt with that avatar imprinted. again a big no. would the users in the flame forum curse people in real life like that? another big no. the reasons why they wouldn't do that are simple. common sense or fear from parents or fear of getting a punch in the face.pascalleke wrote:yeah ok i agree but why cant be just begin all by ourselfs and not use such avatars??? the world is sick enough so...DiM wrote:if flame subforum exists then i don't see why that avatar or any other avatars that contain violence or pornography shouldn't be allowed.
there are lots of young kids on CC that can much more easily be influenced by the flame forums than some guy's avatar.
i've seen people that have 90% of their posts in the flames. people that probably are too young to be allowed to use that kind of language in real life but find that section as a heaven where they can act like idiot and curse all they want. that does a lot more damage to a kids brain than a gross image he can easily find with a google search.
so as long as CC encourages this kind of behavior (simply permitting it is an encouragement) people will do it. delete flame forum and start banning people with offensive avatars names signatures and people that curse and we'll have a better community.
but as long as flame forum is permitted i don't think diehumanitydie should be banned or warned. he simply puts a graphic example of what is spoken in flames.
I honestly don't think that most of the blatant nonsense in Flame Wars is anywhere near as offensive as using an image of someones brain hanging out. (half a head blown off or whatever the harrowing image depicts).. this uses someones genuine death or serious maiming for some sort of entertainment. It is a different level altogether to the inane verbal jousting which most members do accept on face value.