Conquer Club

I'm wondering if I should go and watch the film...

Should I?









Thx Luke

When I heard the title, I thought, "Wow! That could be good!"

Then I saw the trailer.

I'm gonna give it a great big NOPE!

Never even heard of the film :S

btownmeggy wrote:When I heard the title, I thought, "Wow! That could be good!"

Then I saw the trailer.

I'm gonna give it a great big NOPE!

I saw the trailer but I dunno.
Cos History's my favourite subject but I hate films with magic in...
It is realllyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy historicaly inacurate.
So I dunno.

Luke

I totally plan on seeing it.

How many movies do you watch that are historically, culturally, or realistically accurate?

Zero is the answer.

Watch the movie for what it is... enjoyment.

No one gives a shit if u go watch a movie!

Anarkistsdream wrote: How many movies do you watch that are historically, culturally, or realistically accurate?

Zero is the answer.

you forget star wars and toy story

btownmeggy wrote:When I heard the title, I thought, "Wow! That could be good!"

Then I saw the trailer.

I'm gonna give it a great big NOPE!

Me too. Saw the title, watched trailer on imdb and then decided not to watch.
P.S. Looks like a load of crap!

Anarkistsdream wrote:I totally plan on seeing it.

How many movies do you watch that are historically, culturally, or realistically accurate?

Zero is the answer.

Watch the movie for what it is... enjoyment.

I've watched Kingdom of Heaven twice. The first time I pissed off my partner throughout by pointing out intricacies like the fact that Legless is attacked by Assassins wearing the costume of a Knightly order which didn't exist for another few decades, the completely inverted portrayal of Sybella, the bizarre way in which he apparently knighted the every man in Jerusalem etc. etc.

And the second time I just watched it as entertainment.

And it was still shit.

Guiscard wrote:

Anarkistsdream wrote:I totally plan on seeing it.

How many movies do you watch that are historically, culturally, or realistically accurate?

Zero is the answer.

Watch the movie for what it is... enjoyment.

I've watched Kingdom of Heaven twice. The first time I pissed off my partner throughout by pointing out intricacies like the fact that Legless is attacked by Assassins wearing the costume of a Knightly order which didn't exist for another few decades, the completely inverted portrayal of Sybella, the bizarre way in which he apparently knighted the every man in Jerusalem etc. etc.

And the second time I just watched it as entertainment.

And it was still shit.

But at least you gave it a chance.

Guiscard wrote:
I've watched Kingdom of Heaven twice. The first time I pissed off my partner throughout by pointing out intricacies like the fact that Legless is attacked by Assassins wearing the costume of a Knightly order which didn't exist for another few decades, the completely inverted portrayal of Sybella, the bizarre way in which he apparently knighted the every man in Jerusalem etc. etc.

And the second time I just watched it as entertainment.

And it was still shit.

serves you right for watching it twice.

My wife teaches old and new testament at a conservative baptist college. She was trained at Harvard in a traditional academic setting. The old and new testament courses are standardized so they gave her the curriculum, course outline and all that stuff, she doesn't get to teach what she wants.

It was hard on her until she got to the final exam for the new testament class.

Get this - the final exam was to write a historical critique comparing the Mel Gibson's "Jesus the Christ" to the 4 gospels in the new testament.

We had a good laugh at all the papers that were turned in. This semester, just to point out to the faculty how silly the curriculum is, my wife is allowing the students to watch Jesus Christ Superstar instead of Jesus the Christ to see if the papers get any better.

Kingdom of heaven's really rubbish.

but i do watch historicaly acurate films like Ben Hur!









So HA!

The Knight's Hospilater did exist so did The Knight's Templar.




_____________________________________________________________

They really fought in the Crusadeds.


Luke

luke54play wrote:The Knight's Hospilater did exist so did The Knight's Templar.




_____________________________________________________________

They really fought in the Crusadeds.


Luke

Awesome post.

luke54play wrote:The Knight's Hospilater did exist so did The Knight's Templar.




_____________________________________________________________

They really fought in the Crusadeds.


Luke

Hospilater?
Really?

luke54play wrote:The Knight's Hospilater did exist so did The Knight's Templar.




_____________________________________________________________

They really fought in the Crusadeds.


Luke

I'm well up for a bit of fighting in the Crusadeds.

Napoleon Ier wrote:
I'm well up for a bit of fighting in the Crusadeds.

En Guard!

ignotus wrote:

luke54play wrote:The Knight's Hospilater did exist so did The Knight's Templar.




_____________________________________________________________

They really fought in the Crusadeds.


Luke

Hospilater?
Really?

I spelt it wrong. It's spelt Hospitaler

Snorri1234 wrote:

luke54play wrote:The Knight's Hospilater did exist so did The Knight's Templar.




_____________________________________________________________

They really fought in the Crusadeds.


Luke

Awesome post.

Why is it awesome?

It's spelt Crusades!

ignotus wrote:

Napoleon Ier wrote:
I'm well up for a bit of fighting in the Crusadeds.

En Guard!

En Garde. T'as jamais lu Cyrano de Bergerac toi?

Not that my attempt at Croatian was any better.

en Guard?

Can we just talk about 10 000bc please?


Thx Luke

luke54play wrote:The Knight's Hospilater did exist so did The Knight's Templar.




_____________________________________________________________

They really fought in the Crusadeds.


Luke

Yes, but the Teutonic order, who used the white field with a black cross (the tabards worn by the assassins), formed in 1192.

Napoleon Ier wrote:

ignotus wrote:

Napoleon Ier wrote:
I'm well up for a bit of fighting in the Crusadeds.

En Guard!

En Garde. T'as jamais lu Cyrano de Bergerac toi?

Not that my attempt at Croatian was any better.

I know. Crusadeds et all... that's why I spelled En Guard.


Back to subject: 10 000 BC looks like a cheap knock off.
Actors, story and animations... We have all seen that film before.

I was so excited when I heard the tiel, but the trailer, god damnit, why not have a big middle finger while you're at it. Not gonna see it, wish they did a bit better.