Conquer Club

What do you reckon? Is there any mileage in the 'God is a sausage-jockey' theory?

As supporting evidence I present the whole "So I just invented a world eh? I'll fill it with naked men, a big phallic serpent, a shortage of fig-leaves... and no chicks" job that went down in Genesis.

God = Homo. What do you reckon?

To say that God would or could be a homosexual is assuming that one believes that God can be a man or a woman.

Now, Christians believe that Jesus (a man) was God, so therefore it is quite possible to say that the Christians might believe Jesus to be an homosexual, as there are some verses in the bible that seem to point to this.

But, I on the other hand do not believe God is either male nor female, but God just exists...the Eternal Now. So my answer is NO, God is not an Homosexual, based on my belief system.

He's a total fag.

So according to your logic God is neither male or female? And according to the Bible, God loves us all.

This leaves us with two possibilities:
God is both sexes simultaneously = Then God is gay, as he is a man who loves men
God is neither sex, which makes him pretty much inhuman = God is into weird interspecies stuff

God is commonly referred to as "he", so it's possible for him to be homosexual.

You would be putting God down on a human level, thus making him not God.

So no.

Dancing Mustard wrote:So according to your logic God is neither male or female? And according to the Bible, God loves us all.

This leaves us with two possibilities:
God is both sexes simultaneously = Then God is gay, as he is a man who loves men
God is neither sex, which makes him pretty much inhuman = God is into weird interspecies stuff

and don't forget he couldn't even have sex with mary, the holy ghost had to do that

DaGip wrote:To say that God would or could be a homosexual is assuming that one believes that God can be a man or a woman.

Now, Christians believe that Jesus (a man) was God, so therefore it is quite possible to say that the Christians might believe Jesus to be an homosexual, as there are some verses in the bible that seem to point to this.

But, I on the other hand do not believe God is either male nor female, but God just exists...the Eternal Now. So my answer is NO, God is not an Homosexual, based on my belief system.

A lot of Bible scholars feel that it is a distortion to call either God or Adam male, that this was a later addition and that Adam was neither male nor female or was both, and that God is neither or both.

I believe that God is an alien living in the fourth or fifth dimension. And that's he's gay. Flaming homosexual.

I don't believe in the Bibles God.

Dancing Mustard wrote:What do you reckon? Is there any mileage in the 'God is a sausage-jockey' theory?

As supporting evidence I present the whole "So I just invented a world eh? I'll fill it with naked men, a big phallic serpent, a shortage of fig-leaves... and no chicks" job that went down in Genesis.

God = Homo. What do you reckon?

MeDeFe wrote:God is commonly referred to as "he", so it's possible for him to be homosexual.

No, you're both wrong!

God has to be asexual (maybe a one-celled organism ??) or he would have made two at first -- (Adam and Adam or Adam and Eve) instead of just one. ( )

InkL0sed wrote:He's a total fag.

Dude's fuckin gay.

tubaman wrote:

InkL0sed wrote:He's a total fag.

Dude's fuckin gay.

Why else would he want to damage perfectly good vagina's with childbirth?

Okay, that was low... I'm sorry

PLAYER57832 wrote:

Dancing Mustard wrote:What do you reckon? Is there any mileage in the 'God is a sausage-jockey' theory?

As supporting evidence I present the whole "So I just invented a world eh? I'll fill it with naked men, a big phallic serpent, a shortage of fig-leaves... and no chicks" job that went down in Genesis.

God = Homo. What do you reckon?

MeDeFe wrote:God is commonly referred to as "he", so it's possible for him to be homosexual.

No, you're both wrong!

God has to be asexual (maybe a one-celled organism ??) or he would have made two at first -- (Adam and Adam or Adam and Eve) instead of just one. ( )

But can't you say that all one-celled organisms are homosexual since they all have the same sex?

DaGip wrote:Now, Christians believe that Jesus (a man) was God

lol no they don't

dcowboys055 wrote:

DaGip wrote:Now, Christians believe that Jesus (a man) was God

lol no they don't

So Jesus was a woman?

No but Jesus isn't God...duh. He's God's son.

dcowboys055 wrote:No but Jesus isn't God...duh. He's God's son.

Father, son and holy spirit are supposedly one being though and if one is male, aren't they all?

And anyway, this does not in any way refute my previous argument that god is commonly referred to as a "he".

God is not gay, but she is into S&M. Witness the plagues on Egypt, the trials of job, the murder of almost all humans and animals with the great flood, and, above all, the cruelty of the inquisition done in her name.

mpjh wrote:God is not gay, but she is into S&M. Witness the plagues on Egypt, the trials of job, the murder of almost all humans and animals with the great flood, and, above all, the cruelty of the inquisition done in her name.

Impregnating a woman through artificial insemination? Pretty gay...

MeDeFe wrote:

dcowboys055 wrote:No but Jesus isn't God...duh. He's God's son.

Father, son and holy spirit are supposedly one being though and if one is male, aren't they all?

And anyway, this does not in any way refute my previous argument that god is commonly referred to as a "he".

I wasn't trying to refute your argument, I wasn't even talking to you. I was pointing out that dagip was wrong

dcowboys055 wrote:

MeDeFe wrote:

dcowboys055 wrote:No but Jesus isn't God...duh. He's God's son.

Father, son and holy spirit are supposedly one being though and if one is male, aren't they all?

And anyway, this does not in any way refute my previous argument that god is commonly referred to as a "he".

I wasn't trying to refute your argument, I wasn't even talking to you. I was pointing out that dagip was wrong

So they're, at the same time, one being and Jesus is god's son and they're separate? You're weird.

Well most people consider Jesus to be both human and god (sometimes calling him Jesus to refer to human side and Christ to refer to god side) so as a human he is not the Christian God, but as a god, he is part of the Holy Trinity, yes.

dcowboys055 wrote:Well most people consider Jesus to be both human and god (sometimes calling him Jesus to refer to human side and Christ to refer to god side) so as a human he is not the Christian God, but as a god, he is part of the Holy Trinity, yes.

So you're weird and god's male. Got it.

dcowboys055 wrote:Well most people consider Jesus to be both human and god (sometimes calling him Jesus to refer to human side and Christ to refer to god side) so as a human he is not the Christian God, but as a god, he is part of the Holy Trinity, yes.

Is it just me or does this make no sense?

So Christians view him as a God... But he's not the Christian God... Even though the Holy Trinity is God and Jesus is part of the Holy Trinity.