Sarah Palin's daughter pregnant
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 1:41 pm
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
https://conquerclub.com/forum/
Yeah, it was KlobberSnorri1234 wrote:Hey, it wasn't me.
I'm pretty sure he's not in that. As I'm in it, and I haven't seen anyone that stupid there.kletka wrote:Yeah, it was KlobberSnorri1234 wrote:Hey, it wasn't me.. He is a part of new-liberal-commie conspiracy to impregnate christians...
Sarah & Tom Palin wrote: "Bristol and the young man she will marry are going to realise very quickly the difficulties of raising a child, which is why they will have the love and support of our entire family."
you certainly can't argue with that. also, as Obama put it, the situation with Bristol has zero relevance on Sara Palin's ability to govern. None.CrazyAnglican wrote:I liked the article though. She (Sarah Palin) hasn't tried to cover anything up or comprimise her principles. I liked the family's statement:
Sarah & Tom Palin wrote: "Bristol and the young man she will marry are going to realise very quickly the difficulties of raising a child, which is why they will have the love and support of our entire family."
Either wiki stopped making sense or she is seriously confused.wikipedia wrote: "Palin does support contraception, and is a member of Feminists for Life. Palin is also a supporter of abstinence-only education and opposes sex education programs."
Yeah but it got references (which I left out).CrazyAnglican wrote:Well it is wikipedia after all.
Thats politics for ya!Snorri1234 wrote:Still, that whole thing about supporting contraception while also saying noone should be taught about it is kinda....retarded.
EDIT:
Seriously, it's like saying you think evolution is true while supporting creationism-only education in science-class. IT DOESN"T MAKE THE SLIGHTEST BIT OF FUCKING SENSE!
I wish I could make nonsense names that people would believe.Snorri1234 wrote:
Oh wait, it seems FEMINISTS FOR LIFE is actually a pro-life group.
daydream wrote:the only thing that did to me was make me like obama more. his view on it could hardly be more my thoughts. its always good to see politicians respect each others lives like that. i am sure there is a vast majority of politicians that would have used that to slander her and make her look like a hipocrite.
Barack Obama wrote:I have heard some of the news on this and so let me be as clear as possible. I have said before and I will repeat again, I think people’s families are off limits, and people’s children are especially off limits. This shouldn’t be part of our politics, it has no relevance to governor Palin’s performance as a governor or her potential performance as a vice president. And so I would strongly urge people to back off these kinds of stories. You know my mother had me when she was 18. And how family deals with issues and teenage children that shouldn’t be the topic of our politics and I hope that anybody who is supporting me understands that is off limits.
ksslemp wrote:Wow! I must be completely out of touch?
Word. I love the fact that he doesn't want to discuss this shit, even though most people are talking about it. He's a far more decent man than most people.Simon Viavant wrote:This makes Obama seem even better than he already was in my book. He was mature about this, as opposed to Hilary and McCain milking the Reverand Wright thing for all it was worth.
I'm trying to picture Obama saying, in that serious speech-voice of his "And Sarah Palin's daughter... is pregnant! Now, do you really think a mother like that is fit to be President?" but I can't seem to do it...Snorri1234 wrote:Word. I love the fact that he doesn't want to discuss this shit, even though most people are talking about it. He's a far more decent man than most people.Simon Viavant wrote:This makes Obama seem even better than he already was in my book. He was mature about this, as opposed to Hilary and McCain milking the Reverand Wright thing for all it was worth.
Um, while I'm a zillion miles from her opinions, I can understand abstinence for single people and contraception after marriage making perfect sense and not being contradictory. I don't know if this is her position, but it'd make sense.Snorri1234 wrote:Still, that whole thing about supporting contraception while also saying noone should be taught about it is kinda....retarded.
EDIT:
Seriously, it's like saying you think evolution is true while supporting creationism-only education in science-class. IT DOESN"T MAKE THE SLIGHTEST BIT OF FUCKING SENSE!