Page 1 of 1
MissG / Speist Multi? seems likely [Busted +4]
Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 5:37 am
by Songsting
I have been playing two games; one is still going. The two players mysteriously miss turns on the same day, take turns within minutes of each other etc.
Games 4309920 and 4309925
I don't want to falsely accuse a player, but it seems quite suspicious to me.
Accused:
MissG
Speist
The accused are suspected of: Being Multis
Re: MissG / Speist Multi? seems likely
Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:02 am
by SirSebstar
it took me a while to see it, but yes.
They never played a game together. They appear to be from canada, and play almost simultaniously, and fail their turns together too..
wierd. I think a small IP check will clear things up
Re: MissG / Speist Multi? seems likely
Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:39 am
by lancehoch
Re: MissG / Speist Multi? seems likely [Busted +4]
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:49 am
by SirSebstar
If you want to play more games, you really should buy premium
Speist busted, but returned?
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 4:28 am
by Songsting
Accused:
Speist
The accused are confirmed as:
Being Multis
in a thread two or three days ago. Yet, he is back playing in a game against me. Or is someone taking his turns? I'm confused as to how the player (somehow) has taken his turn only 9 hours ago, well after being confirmed as a multi.
Game number(s):
Game 4309920
Re: Speist busted, but returned?
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 4:40 am
by insaneJB
Once busted as a multi and banned they can still take their turns in the games going on without getting premium. It's not against the rules for him to finish the game. A waste of a thread.
Re: Speist busted, but returned?
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 4:58 am
by Songsting
Fair enough. I wasn't aware of that, and thanks for letting me know. I apologise for 'wasting a thread' (although I wasn't aware of the finite nature regarding threads - I kind of thought if we run out, we can make more

).
Re: MissG / Speist Multi? seems likely [Busted +4]
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 11:36 am
by lancehoch
I have merged in the new thread about Speist. gcwca's explanation is correct.