Page 1 of 3

spamalot and "the longest thread" should be merged

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:01 am
by SultanOfSurreal
discuss

Re: spamalot and "the longest thread" should be merged

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:02 am
by xelabale
nah

Re: spamalot and "the longest thread" should be merged

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:04 am
by b.k. barunt
Are we really this desperate for threads around here?


Honibaz

Re: spamalot and "the longest thread" should be merged

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:10 am
by SultanOfSurreal
b.k. barunt wrote:Are we really this desperate for threads around here?


Honibaz
i'm just saying we could get another 3,000 pages into the longest thread and get 2,000 pages of quality spam into spamalot with this, so it's sort of a win-win

Re: spamalot and "the longest thread" should be merged

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:18 am
by johnnyrotten
The longest thread thread is not spam. This is why it is infinitely better than S*****t.

Re: spamalot and "the longest thread" should be merged

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:19 am
by MeDeFe
spamalot and "the longest thread" should be merged
Denied.

They are two entirely different entities and should remain so.

Re: spamalot and "the longest thread" should be merged

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:33 am
by Iliad
johnnyrotten wrote:The longest thread thread is not spam. This is why it is infinitely better than S*****t.
While definitely they are two very different threads, neither can really deny that it has spam. Spam hidden amongst the conversations about anything that strikes the fancy of the people, but there's spam in both nonetheless.

You may want to get off your high horse and understand the concept behind both of the threads is the same.

Re: spamalot and "the longest thread" should be merged

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 10:34 am
by b.k. barunt
No. The worst idea ever was pantyhose.


Honibaz

Re: spamalot and "the longest thread" should be merged

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 10:37 am
by DAZMCFC
£80milllion?!?! wrote:Thats gotta be the worst idea ever.


they don't even like each other. :roll:

Re: spamalot and "the longest thread" should be merged

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 10:43 am
by targetman377
what the hell is wrong with you Sultan!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! the longest thread is based on people talking and not spaming sure we get spam in it but we try to block it fast. and that *^%*&%*&^&(^ other word well lets not get me started.



p.s. hey sultan why stop every thread that has spam it lets just join it in to @!$!#@$!@#$!@# how about that. oh look much ado about nothing has only one thread.


FAIL

Re: spamalot and "the longest thread" should be merged

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 10:55 am
by jonesthecurl
Good sentiment target, and good spell-checking!

Re: spamalot and "the longest thread" should be merged

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 11:14 am
by b.k. barunt
I believe that post could do irrepairable damage to spell-check.


Honibaz

Re: spamalot and "the longest thread" should be merged

Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2009 2:01 am
by xelabale
b.k. barunt wrote:I believe that post could do irrepairable damage to spell-check.


Honibaz
If you're gonna criticise someone's spelling make very sure your spelling is good. ALRIGHT?

Re: spamalot and "the longest thread" should be merged

Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2009 6:03 pm
by Minister Masket
johnnyrotten wrote:The longest thread thread is not spam. This is why it is infinitely better than S*****t.
Yeah sure, and I'm the Queen of Sheba. :lol:

Re: spamalot and "the longest thread" should be merged

Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2009 7:45 pm
by johnnyrotten
Iliad wrote:
johnnyrotten wrote:The longest thread thread is not spam. This is why it is infinitely better than S*****t.
While definitely they are two very different threads, neither can really deny that it has spam. Spam hidden amongst the conversations about anything that strikes the fancy of the people, but there's spam in both nonetheless.

You may want to get off your high horse and understand the concept behind both of the threads is the same.
You may want to stop sounding like a pretentious wanker. :)

Re: spamalot and "the longest thread" should be merged

Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2009 9:35 pm
by autoload
I have nothing against the Monty Python movie thread, but do not wish for the threads to be merged.

Re: spamalot and "the longest thread" should be merged

Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2009 9:39 pm
by Serbia
Someone here is self-important.

Re: spamalot and "the longest thread" should be merged

Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2009 9:57 pm
by hecter
johnnyrotten wrote:
Iliad wrote:
johnnyrotten wrote:The longest thread thread is not spam. This is why it is infinitely better than S*****t.
While definitely they are two very different threads, neither can really deny that it has spam. Spam hidden amongst the conversations about anything that strikes the fancy of the people, but there's spam in both nonetheless.

You may want to get off your high horse and understand the concept behind both of the threads is the same.
You may want to stop sounding like a pretentious wanker. :)
*sings* IRONY!!!

Re: spamalot and "the longest thread" should be merged

Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 12:22 am
by strike wolf
MeDeFe wrote:
spamalot and "the longest thread" should be merged
Denied.

They are two entirely different entities and should remain so.
Agreed

Re: spamalot and "the longest thread" should be merged

Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 12:24 am
by strike wolf
Iliad wrote:
johnnyrotten wrote:The longest thread thread is not spam. This is why it is infinitely better than S*****t.
While definitely they are two very different threads, neither can really deny that it has spam. Spam hidden amongst the conversations about anything that strikes the fancy of the people, but there's spam in both nonetheless.

You may want to get off your high horse and understand the concept behind both of the threads is the same.
Umm...I thought those guys at the other thread deny wanting to be the longest thread. that it "wasn't their intention".

Re: spamalot and "the longest thread" should be merged

Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 12:27 am
by strike wolf
autoload wrote:I have nothing against the Monty Python movie thread, but do not wish for the threads to be merged.
I can more or less agree with this thread.

Re: spamalot and "the longest thread" should be merged

Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 12:29 am
by strike wolf
If nothing else, I would say that these two threads are distinct from each other. Similar in many ways definitely but with their own identities and I would think that those from both threads would mostly disagree with merging them. I could be wrong, but I definitely know that I would not want to see them merged.

Re: spamalot and "the longest thread" should be merged

Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 1:28 am
by apey
*slaps sultan silly*
WTF is a matter with you
:-s

Re: spamalot and "the longest thread" should be merged

Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 1:31 am
by b.k. barunt
* * tries to comfort sultan as he sobs uncontrollably * * There there now, she didn't mean to hurt you.


Honibaz

Re: spamalot and "the longest thread" should be merged

Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 9:43 am
by hecter
strike wolf wrote:
Iliad wrote:
johnnyrotten wrote:The longest thread thread is not spam. This is why it is infinitely better than S*****t.
While definitely they are two very different threads, neither can really deny that it has spam. Spam hidden amongst the conversations about anything that strikes the fancy of the people, but there's spam in both nonetheless.

You may want to get off your high horse and understand the concept behind both of the threads is the same.
Umm...I thought those guys at the other thread deny wanting to be the longest thread. that it "wasn't their intention".
It isn't out intention, but what the longest thread thread is now isn't simply being or becoming the longest thread. It's something different, something more. If it wasn't, you guys would just be sitting there making post of after post that meant nothing, such as "2308944u890sdafkljasd;lfkja".