Conquer Club

As if the forum ban wasn't already unnecessary. You know if we ban a couple more contributing members I bet the site will get a lot better.

timmytuttut88 wrote:As if the forum ban wasn't already unnecessary. You know if we ban a couple more contributing members I bet the site will get a lot better.

huh? you mean i can't go talk to him in chat anymore, and we can't say "hey" in each others games? what happened? can he get his maps back?-0

Another load of shit. lets see how TeamCC dances around this one, or what lame as hell excuses they come up with next.

owenshooter wrote:

timmytuttut88 wrote:As if the forum ban wasn't already unnecessary. You know if we ban a couple more contributing members I bet the site will get a lot better.

huh? you mean i can't go talk to him in chat anymore, and we can't say "hey" in each others games? what happened? can he get his maps back?-0

No idea what happened, but Night Strike just said he just now got website banned.

Game 5302009 maybe? And also several other games like that, but I don't remember anyone posting about it.

they should give back his work that he did for free for them, too... if they don't want him around, then they shouldn't use his work either... this is getting out of hand... bad enough they literally handicapped him to the point where he could not effectively make a map... but now this... give him his stuff back...-0

He should send his maps to Hasbro and give them exclusive rights. Then they can sue again and we can get more maps with no territory names to play on.

I noticed this while in a current game with him. I believe it was for his game chat behaviour, but srsly..

Skittles! wrote:I noticed this while in a current game with him. I believe it was for his game chat behaviour, but srsly..

Everyone is off-base, guess again.

jpcloet wrote:

Skittles! wrote:I noticed this while in a current game with him. I believe it was for his game chat behaviour, but srsly..

Everyone is off-base, guess again.

Why make them guess at all? Perhaps enlightening us would be a better route.

jpcloet wrote:

Skittles! wrote:I noticed this while in a current game with him. I believe it was for his game chat behaviour, but srsly..

Everyone is off-base, guess again.

multi?

jpcloet wrote:

Skittles! wrote:I noticed this while in a current game with him. I believe it was for his game chat behaviour, but srsly..

Everyone is off-base, guess again.

I doubt he would create a multi?

jpcloet wrote:

Skittles! wrote:I noticed this while in a current game with him. I believe it was for his game chat behaviour, but srsly..

Everyone is off-base, guess again.

Why do we need to guess, why can't you just tell us why he was perma-banned?

That is between CC and that player. Can't I have some fun with these whiny threads too?

To ban someone from the forums is one thing. To site-ban them, and continue to use their creation to enhance your own site, is pathetic.

jpcloet wrote:That is between CC and that player. Can't I have some fun with these whiny threads too?

thats not annoying or feeding the fire at all is it

Kotaro wrote:To ban someone from the forums is one thing. To site-ban them, and continue to use their creation to enhance your own site, is pathetic.

When a map is quenched the creator gives over the rights to the use of that map to Conquer Club. That is what I have been told by several cartographers. Therefore, it is not being used "unfairly" in any way.

Optimus Prime wrote:

Kotaro wrote:To ban someone from the forums is one thing. To site-ban them, and continue to use their creation to enhance your own site, is pathetic.

When a map is quenched the creator gives over the rights to the use of that map to Conquer Club. That is what I have been told by several cartographers. Therefore, it is not being used "unfairly" in any way.

can you tell us why he was website banned?

lord voldemort wrote:

jpcloet wrote:That is between CC and that player. Can't I have some fun with these whiny threads too?

thats not annoying or feeding the fire at all is it

t-o-m was permanently forum banned. He was attempting to circumvent that ban, therefore he earned a ban from the entire website. It isn't a complicated situation. He knew what he was doing was wrong and has paid the consequences. Further details can be shared by t-o-m at his discretion as he sees fit.

I'm sure he'll tell us on pile of awesome.

Thanks OP for actually answering the question unlike another person in charge.

Optimus Prime wrote:

lord voldemort wrote:

jpcloet wrote:That is between CC and that player. Can't I have some fun with these whiny threads too?

thats not annoying or feeding the fire at all is it

t-o-m was permanently forum banned. He was attempting to circumvent that ban, therefore he earned a ban from the entire website. It isn't a complicated situation. He knew what he was doing was wrong and has paid the consequences. Further details can be shared by t-o-m at his discretion as he sees fit.

yay an answer...

Optimus Prime wrote:When a map is quenched the creator gives over the rights to the use of that map to Conquer Club. That is what I have been told by several cartographers. Therefore, it is not being used "unfairly" in any way.

When a Map is quenched, the understanding is that, that user who put forth the effort as a valuable member of the community, will be allowed to, as well as others, USE the fruits of their labor, and that the site will honor their commitment to spend countless hours working on it, not site ban them and then continue to use it as though it were their own.

Optimus Prime wrote:

lord voldemort wrote:

jpcloet wrote:That is between CC and that player. Can't I have some fun with these whiny threads too?

thats not annoying or feeding the fire at all is it

t-o-m was permanently forum banned. He was attempting to circumvent that ban, therefore he earned a ban from the entire website. It isn't a complicated situation. He knew what he was doing was wrong and has paid the consequences. Further details can be shared by t-o-m at his discretion as he sees fit.

But t-o-m didn't make a multi. Night strike said he was site banned, but not for making multis. How could he get around a forum ban without doing that?

Was it the fact that someone needed an account sitter in Live Chat earlier, no one could fill the spot, and they gave it to t-o-m? If so, that's bullshit. Ban the guy for helping out someone no one else would?

Skittles! wrote:I'm sure he'll tell us on pile of awesome. Thanks OP for actually answering the question unlike another person in charge.

Unless the information is public knowledge (like C&A), the mods are not supposed to answer the question. There is a guideline and I managed to actually follow it this time.