This is a good idea and would prevent all those times you wait 5 minutes just so you can do something in the last 30 seconds.

Chuck Norris can't even beat a cook.

How come Oasis of Loyalty (an oasis with 5 neutrals on it) is 7 nuetrals away from the grand oases, rather thn the 4 that all the other ones are?

lol my name is listed twice!

sure i'll join

Is there any way for an "auto advance" feature? So it automatically advances all when you attack a place? Would be great in super speed situations.

:lol:
FEAR MY BUNNY ARMY!!!!!
http://i333.photobucket.com/albums/m390/asub3293/B6.png
http://i333.photobucket.com/albums/m390/asub3293/B5.png
http://i333.photobucket.com/albums/m390/asub3293/B4.png
http://i333.photobucket.com ...

I actually kind of like this idea.

Q: Why would someone want to kill someone for less troops than it took to kill someone?
A: No one would do that.
This is also not true. If killing someone gives you a decent shot at a sweep, it might not matter if the first kill was "worth it". Even sometimes when it won't give you a sweep, you ...

The bonus doesn't have to be a set rate like 5, 10, or 15. I suppose it could give you useful abilities, like double or triple the reinforcements you'll get for the next 3 turns or something.

Or, the killing bonus could be worth a certain percent of armies on the map, and that percent would be ...

Concise description:

⋅ Like the No Spoils setting
⋅ However, killing someone will yield in a set amount of bonus reinforcements you can deploy anywhere as soon as you kill them.
⋅ Perhaps something like 10 bonus armies, more or less could be good.
⋅&nbsp ...

Seriously, gcwca, you're just too good. You should get banned for being so good.

maybe hes in some wack like +36 hour time zone O.O

gcwca invited me.
I'm in!

So when does it start?

So before we could leave a negative and let others know about a person, but now all people see are stars and they pretty much mean nothing. I propose we get to leave comments or "feedback" next to them. The wall does not work at all, because if your foe'd you can't put anything on there and they can ...

Count me in.

I think they intentionally left out skill as part of the rating. It is far more important to be a nice person, have good sportsmanship, and just have fun then to piss and moan about how horrible someone is. Simply give them suggestions in the game chat or PM them. A rating really isn't necissary.

At least you got "average"!
Look at this.
The guy is gonna give me 1 star on everything simply because i made a comment on how I didn't appreciate his style of play, which most people would find cheap anyway! He's gonna give me a 1 star on attendance... why??? fair play why?? It makes no sense ...

I love the new rating system, but unfortunately some people are abusing it terribly. If they don't like you, they will give you 1 star in everything, even if you had perfect attendance or played fairly or even if you kept a good attitude!

Take a look at this game. 2664127 I expect I'm going to get ...

sweet but there's one castle being neglected... mua. It's horrrrrible! 6 and 5 on the runes, with 3 in the way, and 5 on the village...

the village is a port so i can't lower it without making the island vulnerable. as for the resources they are just like aoria, 6 and 5 with 3 in the way.

Maybe ...

sweet but there's one castle being neglected... mua. It's horrrrrible! 6 and 5 on the runes, with 3 in the way, and 5 on the village...

I actually adore all three of those ideas, Dim!

You can get unwarrented feedback removed?? What decides if it's "unwarrented" and who do you have to talk to?
how dare you not play as fast as he wanted you to play!!! i mean, taking your turn within the given 24 hour is just ridiculous! i hope you learned your lesson... wow... neg for not playing ...

Haha... it lets you set up a game with 8 players... what happens? Does the game asplode?