Natty dread seems like a good guy to me.
All the posts of his that I've seen have been normal, civil posts.

I hope this guy isn't a multi.

One possibility would be to throw the Koreas into Japan's sphere of influence... I think I was reading how linguistically they were similar and not to mention, Korea was once a Colony of Japan.
I don't really like that idea. I don't think Korea was ever what most people consider a "colony" of ...

I'd play this. I like the idea of a battling swarm of flies.

So, it would be somewhat like this? I just found this on a quick search:



Seems like an interesting concept to me.

Maybe if you ever got a blowjob you'd lighten up and not give a shit about a stupid screenname?

This seems like a cry for attention

I love this screenname.

I'm sorry, I just gotta wonder why people even care about this.

Is johnny really in it to save teh children? Is anyone who complains about others and farming/point schemes?

Farming rules were made and made only for monetary reasons on the site. Recruits were more likely to not buy premiums if ...

Yeah, I like this idea, too.

I played Europa a few times when i first joined CC and i got +4 for holding transcontinental (without kdg), now im playing it and one of my opponents isnt getting a bonus for it . . .


Well thats odd. 6356579 is the only time you have ever played this map with this account. What other account did ...

Again, too many people expect everyone else to think, act. . .and play as they do. They are short sighted and have no imagination. I bet their ancestors didn't like the first dunkers of basketball or spiked volleyballs.

What's next? Gas chambers and Halocaust?

DH

It's more like you're getting ...

Gen.LeeGettinhed wrote:There's a reason civilized countries don't go for "an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth". It's to prevent us from seeing all blind and toothless people.

If we were all blind and toothless, we wouldn't be seeing anything.

ronc8649 wrote:

well kids, it has been too long for you all not to have a face behind the player...

hahahahahha

Yeah, we'd better not deprive David the pleasure of milking one of his best point-cows over and over again.

cairnswk wrote:

rutherfoo wrote:...
Could it really do harm to do a revamp on it to improve some of the graphics?

I'm not really interested in having anyone re-do my graphics, but you're wlecome to put up your own map.

Why don't you just re-do the graphics then.

You don't have to get so defensive. I could care less about who's "famous" on here or whether or not I am.

It's an interesting map, but it looks really flat. That would be fine if there weren't people and a dog on it though. They look flat as well; so flat, it's hard to tell they are even people ...

jefjef wrote:But anyway netham rated David 5 stars. Must not of hated playing him.

You mean "must not've hated" as in "must not have hated"
There's no such thing as "must not of"

About damn time this got addressed again.

You should really add entitled douchebags meandering slowly and obliviously across half the borders, because Portland seems to have the WORST pedestrians I've ever had to drive around, especially in the Pearl District.

That's a ridiculous comment. Portland pedestrians actually obey traffic ...

To be honest, we are both in agreement that there is just something missing here. The map looks good but is missing something, it's not really capturing Portland. Where's the Northwestern flavor? You've got a good playable surface, but it's just colors and pathes. It really is missing a texture ...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0iKzrqblqQ

he's obviously a multi of Charlie from It's Always Sunny In Philidelphia

what the hell, why was she banned?

natty_dread wrote:I'd say either add territories or make some neutral.

I think making a few more start neutral is a good idea.

hahaha, this thread was fun to read.