in please

ok did you read any walls comments because you need some sort of proof either a screen shot of it or some one else not accociated with you to witness it. you havnt gave the hunter much to work with unless they can find a past of them working together

Almost no wall comments at all (just 1 post ...

This is in reference to game 7038377. Something just seems very fishy to me. 4 player game where no one has attacked the power, despite him holding (and getting the bonus for) a big bonus region, despite him having 2s or 3s on a border (which has been built up a little since he got his bonus ...

samuelc812 wrote:
You have until 11:59pm GMT on the 3rd of June to register a guess in this thread.]

Do we only get 1 guess?

Battle Royale tournament on the Classic map?

Taking a look at my current game, the power is in total control and is only holding 195 territories/regions at this point. So the objective of 250 territories/regions I believe is totally unnecessary.

I'll agree with others to a point on here...if 250 territories are held by one player, the game is basically over, and the rest is basically so many rounds of finishing the game up. Not really a point to that, though it would clear up spots quicker for freemiums, like myself.
Something I have ...

Well, the other power seems to have squashed the one power's idea of email co-ordinating. With them co-ordinating in the game chat right now, this can just go as a normal Q & A type thing.
And I agree totally with what you've said. Hopefully anyone else in this situation that gets this idea will see ...

I am currently in a terminator game where only 4 of the original 8 players remain. The 2 powers of the game made a deal to go after the weaker 2 (me being one) and settle things between themselves after the weaker 2 are eliminated (the deal basically hands the game to a certain player, admittedly so ...

You need to stop posting so many new threads in this forum. Especially when they all have the same theme.

Cheers, JB ;)

I was just splitting the 2 ideas since I didn't really start out with 2 clear ideas the first time. My first thread has 2 links to these 2 current threads with a clearer ...

Being stuck in a game where everything has almost become predictable, in large part because of the turn order staying the same, I really like this idea.

I think I have screwed up this thread. I'm considering making 2 separate new proposals so that both ideas can have their own thread.

If you want to make further comments on these subjects, please do it on the new threads...

Evil Wild Cards: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t ...

Nuclear spoils is still somewhat new, but I know people are enjoying that style of gameplay. I have an idea about mixing this gameplay with our usual spoils games.

My idea is to add a color to the standard red green and blue, and designate the new color (black? orange?) as nuclear spoils. Spoils ...

The idea of wild cards is on Lack's to do list, and the discussion topic can be found here: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4008

My idea is to add something to it, not as a required part of that gameplay, but an additional option. My idea is to add a nuclear element to it, and I ...

I just checked out Lack's to-do-list, and wild cards are on there...
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4008
...so I think this would be a logical next step for that type of game.

I think I have screwed up this thread. I'm considering making 2 separate new proposals so that both ideas ...

So thinking about this, I think we could do 2 different things with this proposal...

1. actual wild cards with the odds of a black (nuclear) spoil being very low. With this proposal, a black spoil would be a wild card where you could use it as any of the other 3 colors. And of course, the black ...

I for one am enjoying the somewhat new nuclear spoils games. And I recently had an idea I wanted to try out on you...combining regular and nuclear spoils. Or 'Evil Wild Cards' as a friend has suggested.

We already have red, green, and blue spoils for games where we get a bonus for holding the spoil ...

I'm not to the point where I'm going to accuse someone of cheating, but I have had some attacks that defy logic. In short, I probably lost 26 armies with the other player losing only 1, and that after changing where I attack to just take a 1. What makes this even stranger is it was right after ...

Updating the situation...all further discussion could be moot at this point. The game is over, another player won. Synigma never did get his deferred troops.
All's well that ends well I guess.

My 2 cents worth since I basically just play on this site and have no real decision-making authority...
Banning is way too harsh. He honestly might have rationalized his choice to do this by saying it's not stopping me from doing it...which it wasn't. But at the same time, I don't think he should be ...

Accused:
Synigma

The accused are suspected of:
Other: Cheating the system by use of deferred troops

Game number(s):
4433846

Comments: Before commenting on the accused, I feel it necessary to give a little background info on this game. This was involved in the site hiccup on April 18th (http://www ...

What, if anything, does this mean for current games? I have a 'sequential' game that was turned into a game with 2 green lights back on April 18 because of a site hiccup. Would it be possible to put this fix into effect with this game so said loophole can't be used? (game #4433846)

That looks like the basic concept (once you just focus on the overall picture and not just each individual picture on the thing...that just looks weird)....just not at all what I had in mind for this map though. I was thinking the passageways from room to room would just be passageways, not really ...

You mentioned making it an objective map...did you have a certain objective in mind? Curious.

Here's an idea to get around the copyright issue...call the map Conquer Detective or something like that (PacMan is called Conquer Man, so no originality points for me on that one).