And if you're against gays, you're not thinking: more gay men mean more available women for the rest of us
Moderator: Community Team
Don't the lesbians kinda balance that out though?Heimdall wrote:Why would you even care if 2 consenting adults got married? It's none of your business.
And if you're against gays, you're not thinking: more gay men mean more available women for the rest of us

I believe there's a greater ratio of gay men than lesbians. And a greater ratio of bi-sexual women than bi-sexual men.hecter wrote:Don't the lesbians kinda balance that out though?Heimdall wrote:Why would you even care if 2 consenting adults got married? It's none of your business.
And if you're against gays, you're not thinking: more gay men mean more available women for the rest of us
Nah, I've seen lesbians in films. They're pretty open minded when it comes to shagging - men are more often than not included in their sordid affairs.hecter wrote:Don't the lesbians kinda balance that out though?Heimdall wrote:Why would you even care if 2 consenting adults got married? It's none of your business.
And if you're against gays, you're not thinking: more gay men mean more available women for the rest of us
No no no, you don't understand... God gave us free-will to do as we please, but then wrote a big invisible list of arbitrary things that he didn't like; then he made it so that we'd be tortured in hell, and subjected to agony, fire and torment for all eternity if we did any of those things without saying sorry to him afterwards.lcb11 wrote:Hey, here's one for those with 'Christian objections' - how about God gave them free will to do as they please?
This is also true in every possible way.Heimdall wrote:Plus Jesus was surely gay so he would of probably supported gay marriage.
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
Really? That's absolutely atrocious ... hope you manage to find somewheresatanspaladin wrote:Well civil partnerships are not equal to marriage in the uk .
there are a hole host of discrimination that are still sanctioned by the state .
just an example that is bothering me and my wife a the moment .
I am trying to find a joint burial plot for us ,and finding i nearly in possible
to find a cemetery that will let us be together and have a head stone .this kind of discrimination would not be applied to a heterosexual couple.
so yes i do want gay marriage to be legal in all aspects for wile its called any thing else its always going to be treated as something less .
and its not because i want some god to give sanction to my marriage that i wish it to be called the same ,its because i want the same rights as any one else .
No it's FOR GOD!Greven wrote: Why? well because a marrige is a way for two people (gay or straight) to show their love for each other and to make it public.
It is hard as hell to have an intellegent discussion about this kind of thing. Make god come down and say that marrige is for him and you have a case.Snorri1234 wrote:No it's FOR GOD!Greven wrote: Why? well because a marrige is a way for two people (gay or straight) to show their love for each other and to make it public.
Yeah I know. For some weird reason christian fundies believe they invented the term "marriage" and are worshipping a guy who preached tolerance, which they interpret as a reason to discriminate against gays, women, atheists, other religions and basically anyone with a different viewpoint.Greven wrote:It is hard as hell to have an intellegent discussion about this kind of thing. Make god come down and say that marrige is for him and you have a case.Snorri1234 wrote:No it's FOR GOD!Greven wrote: Why? well because a marrige is a way for two people (gay or straight) to show their love for each other and to make it public.
At the same time, I have to get god to come down at say that it is to show their love, before I have a case.
Screw this I'm out of here.

Jesse710 wrote:There are more important matters.
b.k. barunt wrote:Snorri's like one of those fufu dogs who get all excited and dance around pissing on themself.
suggs wrote:scared off by all the pervs and wankers already? No? Then let me introduce myself, I'm Mr Pervy Wank.
Why? Do you think that suddenly all the kids will become gay if they tell them about it?Norse wrote:I said "yes" grudgingly, not because I think that all gays are evil, but because I would prefer to call it a civil-partnership, with similiar marraige rights, but without the actual name.
I think it has been scientifically proven that gay people are biologically born this way, and I have come to the thinking that it would be simply unfair not to allow them to the same benefits as married couples.
However. I am vehemently against "gay awareness" and "gay sex education" within schools.
Yeah, well that's not big suprise, clivey-shnookums.Clive wrote:All my views have already been stated. I am for. Strongly. I can't believe "No" is winning this poll.
b.k. barunt wrote:Snorri's like one of those fufu dogs who get all excited and dance around pissing on themself.
suggs wrote:scared off by all the pervs and wankers already? No? Then let me introduce myself, I'm Mr Pervy Wank.
Norse wrote:Yeah, well that's not big suprise, clivey-shnookums.Clive wrote:All my views have already been stated. I am for. Strongly. I can't believe "No" is winning this poll.