Was Jesus Gay?

Heimdall · Post by **Heimdall** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 7:37 pm

Was Jesus Gay?

This poll is totally bias and confusing (on purpose)

soundout9 · Post by **soundout9** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 7:45 pm

Snorri1234 · Post by **Snorri1234** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 8:35 pm

Yes.

Hitman079 · Post by **Hitman079** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 9:07 pm

whoa-ho. not cool, man.
if you're looking for proof in the Bible, look someplace else. the only even remote possible reference to homosexuality is the mention of "the disciple Jesus loved" in the Bible, which is probably John (the evangelist) himself. and even if it isn't, i doubt that "the disciple Jesus loved" can be translated to his "partner."

Skittles! · Post by **Skittles!** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 9:26 pm

Here's another question.

Was Jesus Black? The answer is obviously yes.

Heimdall · Post by **Heimdall** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 9:29 pm

Hitman079 wrote:whoa-ho. not cool, man.
if you're looking for proof in the Bible, look someplace else. the only even remote possible reference to homosexuality is the mention of "the disciple Jesus loved" in the Bible, which is probably John (the evangelist) himself. and even if it isn't, i doubt that "the disciple Jesus loved" can be translated to his "partner."

What about the Gospel of John 6:56?

"He that sucked my flesh, and swallowed my nectar, is in me and I in him"

or

John 6:66

"Than Jesus declared: Matthew, get some more Vaseline"

comic boy · Post by **comic boy** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 9:43 pm

No idea if he was gay but from a historical perspective it is extremely unlikely that he was unmarried.

Hitman079 · Post by **Hitman079** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 10:04 pm

Heimdall wrote:
Hitman079 wrote:whoa-ho. not cool, man.
if you're looking for proof in the Bible, look someplace else. the only even remote possible reference to homosexuality is the mention of "the disciple Jesus loved" in the Bible, which is probably John (the evangelist) himself. and even if it isn't, i doubt that "the disciple Jesus loved" can be translated to his "partner."
What about the Gospel of John 6:56?

"He that sucked my flesh, and swallowed my nectar, is in me and I in him"

or

John 6:66

"Than Jesus declared: Matthew, get some more Vaseline"

Uh, well, at the last supper, Jesus declared the end of the old Covenant and the age of a new once- changes such as you don't die from going into the Temple, nor do you have to make animal sacrifices; Jesus is the ultimate sacrifice. This verse (John 6:56) pertains to the Eucharist's bread and wine symbolizing Jesus's flesh and blood, and Christians commemorate that sacrifice every Sunday in this way.

And in John 6:66, Jesus never stated WHAT he needed Vaseline for. Maybe his feet were dry, since everyone wore sandals back then (yes, I do know that John 6:66 is a joke).

-ShadySoul- · Post by **-ShadySoul-** » Sat Jan 05, 2008 3:38 am

Isnt Christianity really against anything out of ordinary? I am sure they would make their "Son of God" into a norm.

lord voldemort · Post by **lord voldemort** » Sat Jan 05, 2008 3:46 am

-ShadySoul- wrote:Isnt Christianity really against anything out of ordinary? I am sure they would make their "Son of God" into a norm.

no...but the point is that jesus is normal like all of us, ie he went through all the temptations of man..and stilll died on the cross

Ariel* · Post by Ariel* » Sat Jan 05, 2008 3:53 am

Heimdall wrote:
Hitman079 wrote:whoa-ho. not cool, man.
if you're looking for proof in the Bible, look someplace else. the only even remote possible reference to homosexuality is the mention of "the disciple Jesus loved" in the Bible, which is probably John (the evangelist) himself. and even if it isn't, i doubt that "the disciple Jesus loved" can be translated to his "partner."
What about the Gospel of John 6:56?

"He that sucked my flesh, and swallowed my nectar, is in me and I in him"

or

John 6:66

"Than Jesus declared: Matthew, get some more Vaseline"

Beastly · Post by **Beastly** » Sat Jan 05, 2008 4:29 am

Heimdall wrote:Was Jesus asexual?

This poll is totally bias and confusing (on purpose)

He could have been, but it wouldn't matter either way. even IF he was a woman, or a he/she, or whatever, what he came for would still have been accomplished. Gay or not.

Skittles! wrote:Here's another question.

Was Jesus Black? The answer is obviously yes.

Jesus was not Black, like African black. He was dark like Egyptians.

Skittles! · Post by **Skittles!** » Sat Jan 05, 2008 4:31 am

Beastly wrote:Jesus was not Black, like African black. He was dark like Egyptians.

Ah, news flash Beastly, Egypt is in Africa.

PersianPrince · Post by **PersianPrince** » Sat Jan 05, 2008 4:33 am

Beastly wrote:
Heimdall wrote:Was Jesus asexual?

Skittles! wrote:Here's another question.

Was Jesus Black? The answer is obviously yes.

Jesus was not Black, like African black. He was dark like Egyptians.

Dude he was a jew.

Was he gay?

Mabye he's bi, lots of guys and girls "feel of love of jesus inside them"

Beastly · Post by **Beastly** » Sat Jan 05, 2008 4:37 am

Jesus was African Egyptian Black.

greenoaks · Post by **greenoaks** » Sat Jan 05, 2008 4:38 am

Skittles! wrote:Here's another question.

Was Jesus Black? The answer is obviously yes.

no way, jesus was a jew
he would have looked like a hollywood film producer or director

Skittles! · Post by **Skittles!** » Sat Jan 05, 2008 4:39 am

Beastly wrote:Jesus was African Egyptian Black.

So you understand that Egypt is located in Africa now? That's good.

Beastly · Post by **Beastly** » Sat Jan 05, 2008 5:34 am

The Gospel writers record an account when Jesus avoided violence by an angry mob simply by mingling with the crowd. Judas had to identify Him with a kiss of betrayal. Obviously, these incidents show us that Jesus looked like any other Jew of His day.

Egypt was a multi-cultural society in which all were welcome. So I don't think Jesus was Black African, even though he lived in Egypt.

Neutrino · Post by **Neutrino** » Sat Jan 05, 2008 6:27 am

Beastly wrote:
He could have been, but it wouldn't matter either way. even IF he was a woman, or a he/she, or whatever, what he came for would still have been accomplished. Gay or not.

Someone's obviously not considering the implications of Jesus' homosexuality...

Dancing Mustard · Post by **Dancing Mustard** » Sat Jan 05, 2008 6:35 am

There's actually a great deal of information in the bible that indicates Jesus was, if not entirely homosexual, at least bisexual with a strong preference to males.

Take for example the story about the infinite division of the bread and the fishes. It's not a bible story which is meant to be taken literally, it's simply a metaphor for the speech which Jesus gave to his followers in which he was attempting to explain that no harm would come to them, and that they would not be judged unfavourably by god, if they indulged in relationships or life-partnerships with the same sex; a practice Jesus was in favour of. The bread is simply a symbol for males, and its infinite division represents homosexual men being able to thrive happily in communities where only males were present (or in homogenous relationships without the presence of females), and in which those males would practice homosexual practices. The same is true for the fish, except it was a symbol for females.

Skittles! · Post by **Skittles!** » Sat Jan 05, 2008 6:37 am

Is the fish part for females because some pussies smell like fish?

mybike_yourface · Post by **mybike_yourface** » Sat Jan 05, 2008 6:58 am

Beastly wrote:Jesus was African Egyptian Black.

if you look at the lineages of Shem it's only gets more confusing.

Heimdall · Post by **Heimdall** » Sun Jan 06, 2008 2:47 am

Skittles! wrote:Is the fish part for females because some pussies smell like fish?

Why is that? Some smell great and others are just foul.

-ShadySoul- · Post by **-ShadySoul-** » Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:20 am

Heimdall wrote:
Skittles! wrote:Is the fish part for females because some pussies smell like fish?

Why is that? Some smell great and others are just foul.

Oh man, you have just retrieved my worst nightmares from my deep unconsciousness

Hitman079 · Post by **Hitman079** » Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:51 am

Dancing Mustard wrote:There's actually a great deal of information in the bible that indicates Jesus was, if not entirely homosexual, at least bisexual with a strong preference to males.

Take for example the story about the infinite division of the bread and the fishes. It's not a bible story which is meant to be taken literally, it's simply a metaphor for the speech which Jesus gave to his followers in which he was attempting to explain that no harm would come to them, and that they would not be judged unfavourably by god, if they indulged in relationships or life-partnerships with the same sex; a practice Jesus was in favour of. The bread is simply a symbol for males, and its infinite division represents homosexual men being able to thrive happily in communities where only males were present (or in homogenous relationships without the presence of females), and in which those males would practice homosexual practices. The same is true for the fish, except it was a symbol for females.

source? so, are all of Jesus's miracles metaphors