1 player games

Boss_oss_ss · Post by **Boss_oss_ss** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:16 am

I had the idea that you could make a 1 player game where you play against the computer. The computer could be programmed to play at the same level you do. This will help low level people earn some points and high levelled a challenge.

Sir. Ricco · Post by **Sir. Ricco** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:20 am

Boss_oss_ss wrote:I had the idea that you could make a 1 player game where you play against the computer. The computer could be programmed to play at the same level you do. This will help low level people earn some points and high levelled a challenge.

I like the idea but i think it would take a lot to program it. Like time, money and staff.

Mr Unbeatable · Post by **Mr Unbeatable** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:41 am

Great idea and i think many would use it. Although i can't see this happening as it will cost a lot of time and money to produce.

cena-rules · Post by **cena-rules** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 12:17 pm

2 things

1) next time use the form
2) this will result in abuse by the top players

Clive · Post by **Clive** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 12:22 pm

No I don't like this idea at all. This site is about competing with other players. And Cena's probably right too.

Night Strike · Post by **Night Strike** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 12:23 pm

How would points be gained/lost? We've already established that there is an inflation problem. This would add more points to the system. I think no point games would be a better idea than this.

Coleman · Post by **Coleman** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 12:24 pm

Oddly enough I've (or maybe it was someone else) well anyway somebody suggested a tutorial system that was somewhat like this. It wouldn't be actual games though.

All tutorials would likely just be 1 player objective only maps against a neutral with no point gain or loss. If they ever get made.

yeti_c · Post by **yeti_c** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:54 pm

The Computer could lose/gain points - so it would go up and down the scoreboard... depending on how well Lack programmed it - it would do well - and take points out - or if it was crap then it would end up with Simtom!!

C.

Russianfire8371 · Post by **Russianfire8371** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:45 pm

yeti_c wrote:The Computer could lose/gain points - so it would go up and down the scoreboard... depending on how well Lack programmed it - it would do well - and take points out - or if it was crap then it would end up with Simtom!!

C.

or just make the games against computers not be worth points....

john1099 · Post by **john1099** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:53 pm

Haha, by the title I was thinking that you were suggesting playing with yourself!

Anyways, I believe that this could work for no points, but as soon as you add points into the mix, there could be flaws in the system, making it easy, or more difficult to win!

Fieryo · Post by **Fieryo** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 9:11 pm

I don't like it. Next thing you know we'll start replacing people in the real world with computers and next thing you know we'll have machine overlords and humanity will be on the brink of extinction....that is, until Arnold Schwarzenegger comes to save us all.

Risktaker17 · Post by **Risktaker17** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 9:59 pm

what about points?

hecter · Post by **hecter** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:02 pm

I don't see the point of this... I mean, with 20 thousand people on the scoreboard, it shouldn't be too hard to find somebody of your own level now, should it?

Russianfire8371 · Post by **Russianfire8371** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:21 pm

hecter wrote:I don't see the point of this... I mean, with 20 thousand people on the scoreboard, it shouldn't be too hard to find somebody of your own level now, should it?

not so much to play somone your level, but to practice. A person has a life and can leave at any minute, not to mention that they might take 5-55 minutes to take their turns. A computer would play faster and you can play it whenever you want at your leasure

hecter · Post by **hecter** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:26 pm

Russianfire8371 wrote:
hecter wrote:I don't see the point of this... I mean, with 20 thousand people on the scoreboard, it shouldn't be too hard to find somebody of your own level now, should it?
not so much to play somone your level, but to practice. A person has a life and can leave at any minute, not to mention that they might take 5-55 minutes to take their turns. A computer would play faster and you can play it whenever you want at your leasure

Or you can buy premium and they'll take 5 seconds to 5 minutes...

Russianfire8371 · Post by **Russianfire8371** » Wed Jan 09, 2008 7:33 am

hecter wrote:
Russianfire8371 wrote:
hecter wrote:I don't see the point of this... I mean, with 20 thousand people on the scoreboard, it shouldn't be too hard to find somebody of your own level now, should it?
not so much to play somone your level, but to practice. A person has a life and can leave at any minute, not to mention that they might take 5-55 minutes to take their turns. A computer would play faster and you can play it whenever you want at your leasure
Or you can buy premium and they'll take 5 seconds to 5 minutes...

I was thinking more of the AI being a premium only option

1 player games

1 player games

Re: 1 player games