Cheater found:DJTiberious, Sonofsibir [cleared]

[Toofless]

ubject line:] DJTiberious


These are suspected Multis/Secret Aliance (delete the one they are not)

Suspect users: DJTiberious, Sonofsibir

Game number: See game #'s 67931, 66920, 64745, 42620, 42619

Comments:DJTiberious and sonofsibir are clearly cheating. They both joined on the same day. See above referenced games and note how they never attack each other. Also usually sonofsibir will just deploy and not attack to buffer DJTiberious. I would like to suggest a reward system for giving the tipster (me) points from the cheater for information leading to the conviction of a suspected cheater. Look at the games, this one is a slam dunk obvious cheater. Please let me know how you handle this.


Toofless

[Toofless]

Game #'s

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=67931
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=66920
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=64745
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=42620
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=42619

[lackattack]

I could not find any evidence of DJTiberious and Sonofsibir being multiple accounts. If you think there was a secret alliance, you can punish them yourself with negative feedback.

[DJTiberious]

Excuse me, but Sonofsibir and I are friends, so we'll play the occassional game together. Is that wrong? I didn't think so. Also, I didn't attack him because there wasn't a distinct strategic advantage. Plus, looking at from the common sense viewpoint, am I, as the attacker, going to attack an army of 3 or of 1. Obviously I'm going to attack the army of 1, which just happened to be Toofless. Sorry buddy, there's no offense.

[jtedford]

These are both former students of mine. Your accusations of cheating are out of line. I'll spell it out for you using your own "logic":

1) Game #67931 - you're losing, therefore you are pissed. DJTiberious has attacked SOS, albeit infrequently. So what? He's being strategic. I'd attack you, too, in the hopes that I'd kill your team and get your cards. It's called strategy.

2) #66920: Where are they going to attack each other? What strategic advantage is there to attacking each other?

3) #64745: What do you not understand of them being on a TEAM? Moron.

4) #42620: They clearly attacked each other. If you'd think clearly, they attacked each the other player because he/she was clearly the stronger opponent. There's nothing "hidden" about trying to take out the most powerful opponent. It's called STRATEGY.

5) #42619: Everyone attacked everyone else. No secret alliance whatsoever.

In your current game, it appears that you are a sore loser who can't deal with losing when you think you're being "ganged-up-on". Get over it. You're the weakest player in that game and should just move on to one of your other games.

I can't stand when people like you accuse nice guys like DJTiberious and SonOfSibir of cheating. They're good men who deserve better than this.

[AndyDufresne]

Unfortunately some 'nice guys' are multi's. That's what this forum is for, to root out multiple accounts. For every one innocent that gets accused, you can bet we will bust two other guilty parties who were nice guys. The innocents get cleared, no harm no foul.


--Andy