Moderator: Community Team
JESUS SAVES!!!PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.

are registered trademarks of Backglass Heavy Industries.Maybe a number of them do: not this guy.Grooveman2007 wrote:Americans have three past times.
1. Baseball
2. NASCAR
3. Conspiracy theories
These claims would definatly fall under the third catigory.
1. It wasn't kept perfectly quiet, thats why there is so much doubt about itBackglass wrote:Another idiot takes the bait.
I love how a 30 year CIA veteran is now considered an "expert" in building design and demolition. These so called "experts" are no more experts than you and I.
The "experts" have spoken time & time again but it's not nearly as much fun to believe the truth. It is MUCH more exciting to believe that the largest conspiracy in world history has been kept perfectly quiet for over FIVE YEARS under the command of the biggest fool ever to hold our highest office.
Yeah...thats what happened.
Please kids....grow up.

Hm...I'm tempted to write out all the typical responses to this, but I'm kind of busy right now. Anyone else willing to do more than link to the 100+ page thread where arguments for the government coverup slowly lost ground and ended with demands of photographic evidence the government didn't blow up the twin towers?SolidLuigi wrote:1. It wasn't kept perfectly quiet, thats why there is so much doubt about itBackglass wrote:Another idiot takes the bait.
I love how a 30 year CIA veteran is now considered an "expert" in building design and demolition. These so called "experts" are no more experts than you and I.
The "experts" have spoken time & time again but it's not nearly as much fun to believe the truth. It is MUCH more exciting to believe that the largest conspiracy in world history has been kept perfectly quiet for over FIVE YEARS under the command of the biggest fool ever to hold our highest office.
Yeah...thats what happened.
Please kids....grow up.
2. Your argument that contains insults like "idiot" and "kids" and no facts to back it up is a perfect example of the "peer pressure" influence that is inflicted on people, and then the people inflict it onto each other. It's really a genius idea that works in their favor. They tell you what they say is the "truth". Since it was an attack on us, there is "no way the gov't can be lying" right? So now when you hear someone raise questions with actual facts and evidence, "WHAT ARE YOU AN IDIOT?" a baseless jab at someone with nothing to refute their claims, just a personal attack to divert the attention from the fact that you either A. don't have a response to the facts presented, or B. you really haven't done any research on the subject and you are just blindly following what you are told by mass media. really? someone's an idiot for questioning the government, which is consisted of humans, humans who are buyable, subject to error, and can lie to people, just like you and I can lie to whomever we want. Forget the government, how is someone an idiot for questioning anything? Questioning is what separates us from robots or animals, questioning shows that you are thinking for yourself and are using your brain. I'll give you a list of things to find facts to counter these:
-Molten metal pools found at the base of the steel
-No steel skyscraper before or after 9/11 has ever collapsed due to fire, and on 9/11, 3 steel skyscrapers did according to the report. The debris was quickly cleaned up and sold as scrap to china and india only to places that were going to melt it down. Why's this important? When a disaster happens, plane crash or car crash or building collapse, it is carefully reconstructed so engineers can find out what were the weak points in the design that caused it to collapse or fail and therefore know for future reference, better building methods. Now add that to the fact that these were the first 3 steel skyscrapers in history to ever collapse from fire, now it should really be investigated and reconstructed because obviously something was very wrong if these were the only ones brought down by fire.
-Thermate, a patented demolition substance, found in the dust and ruins of 9/11
-Steel supports sheared off at a precise angle, very similar to controlled demolitons
-The speed and preciseness at which the towers fell as soon as they started falling. They fell so fast that an object dropped from the roof of the towers at the same time they started to fall, would hit the ground the same time the top of the tower did. There is no resistance against the object, so therefore for the tower to match that speed, there had to be no resistance below it, basically a free fall. all that steel, all those floors. even if you believe the pancake theory, each time a floor pancaked onto another, there would be at least some delay
-For a bulding to fall uniformly straight into its footprint, all supports must be cut at the same moment at the same angle so all the weight falls at the same time.
-WTC building 7...... do I have to say more about that one?
-Bush and Cheney refusing to answer questions candidly, or under oath to the 9/11 comission.
Now what you must understand is I am not saying this definitively points to "The government did it!". It shows that at least something was covered up, something is fishy about it. You just have to use your brain, question everything, would you trust some random guy who came up to you on the street? So why trust a politician? cause he's rich? cause he has a title? The founding fathers set up small government with checks and balances for these exact reasons! They knew power and money corrupts. Now we are slowly losing our rights they set up for us, and those checks and balances are slowly being destroyed and government is getting way too big and spending way too much. All I ask is just to honestly question things, thats why we have brains.
Then you can please give us a quote from someone...ANYONE who claims to be "in on this" and is now coming forward with evidence.SolidLuigi wrote:1. It wasn't kept perfectly quiet, thats why there is so much doubt about it
Care to tell us how old you are? I am guessing well under 25. Now...do you know where the search button is? This silly claim has been run into the ground OVER and OVER again. But, if you must I will humor you.SolidLuigi wrote:2. Your argument that contains insults like "idiot" and "kids" and no facts to back it up
Sources please, not must random claims. A nice photo of a molten metal pool would do.SolidLuigi wrote:-Molten metal pools found at the base of the steel
Bullshit. Sources please. I have been to the 9-11 landfills. Have you? The debris had to be combed for body parts...a terribly painstaking process.SolidLuigi wrote:-No steel skyscraper before or after 9/11 has ever collapsed due to fire, and on 9/11, 3 steel skyscrapers did according to the report. The debris was quickly cleaned up and sold as scrap to china and india
Are you honestly claiming that the building collapses have not been throughly investigated? Are you insane? This is now Structural 101 at colleges around the world. You will learn this once you attend.SolidLuigi wrote: only to places that were going to melt it down. Why's this important? When a disaster happens, plane crash or car crash or building collapse, it is carefully reconstructed so engineers can find out what were the weak points in the design that caused it to collapse or fail and therefore know for future reference, better building methods. Now add that to the fact that these were the first 3 steel skyscrapers in history to ever collapse from fire, now it should really be investigated and reconstructed because obviously something was very wrong if these were the only ones brought down by fire.
Bullshit. Reliable source please. Besides, wasnt it all sold quickly to CHina?SolidLuigi wrote:Thermate, a patented demolition substance, found in the dust and ruins of 9/11
Bullshit. Reliable source please.SolidLuigi wrote:Steel supports sheared off at a precise angle, very similar to controlled demolitons
This has been debunked over and over again. The towers did not free-fall.SolidLuigi wrote:The speed and preciseness at which the towers fell as soon as they started falling. They fell so fast that an object dropped from the roof of the towers at the same time they started to fall, would hit the ground the same time the top of the tower did. There is no resistance against the object, so therefore for the tower to match that speed, there had to be no resistance below it, basically a free fall. all that steel, all those floors. even if you believe the pancake theory, each time a floor pancaked onto another, there would be at least some delay
Bullshit. Physics 101. The mass of those buildings were HUGE compared to the mass of the planes. Where else would they fall but straight down? If you think they would fall over like a childrens toy you need to do some more research.SolidLuigi wrote:For a bulding to fall uniformly straight into its footprint, all supports must be cut at the same moment at the same angle so all the weight falls at the same time.
Please do.SolidLuigi wrote:-WTC building 7...... do I have to say more about that one?
Exactly what questions did they refuse to answer? Are they suspects? What is your evidence?SolidLuigi wrote:-Bush and Cheney refusing to answer questions candidly, or under oath to the 9/11 comission.
No...it shows nothing but reaching to a forgone conclusion by the uneducated. You have taken bad science, rumor and ignorance and formed a guess. Experts who have NOTHING to do with our government from around the world have weighed in on this with the same conclusions. Are they in on the conspiracy as well? The college professors and structural experts, MANY of whom are democrats and LOATH bush say the same things. Are THEY also on the take?SolidLuigi wrote:Now what you must understand is I am not saying this definitively points to "The government did it!". It shows that at least something was covered up, something is fishy about it.

are registered trademarks of Backglass Heavy Industries.The weirdest thing about this one is that the towers couldn't free-fall anyway. Even if the government was somehow behind it, did they magically counter the laws of psychics? The only way the top of the tower free-falled is if the rest of the tower disappeared magically. If someone placed bombs over the whole place, it still wouldn't free-fall, as the force of all those explosions plus the time all those explosions took would've held the top in the air longer anyway.Backglass wrote:This has been debunked over and over again. The towers did not free-fall.SolidLuigi wrote:The speed and preciseness at which the towers fell as soon as they started falling. They fell so fast that an object dropped from the roof of the towers at the same time they started to fall, would hit the ground the same time the top of the tower did. There is no resistance against the object, so therefore for the tower to match that speed, there had to be no resistance below it, basically a free fall. all that steel, all those floors. even if you believe the pancake theory, each time a floor pancaked onto another, there would be at least some delay
Neutrino wrote:Snorri1234 wrote: laws of psychics?![]()
I'll give you 30 seconds to work out what's wrong with this phrase...
Yes conspiracy idiots need to be quiet, but don't begin your post 'Americans get over it' as the majority of Americans are not conspiracy idiots.Skittles! wrote:Americans, just get over it already! Does it really matter if the government set up 9/11? NO, because it is the past. Just STFU about it already, NO ONE CARES WHAT YOU CONSPIRACY IDIOTS HAVE TO FUCKING SAY.soundout9 wrote:The gov set-up 9/11wcaclimbing wrote:TL/DR
summary for the lazy people, please?
Well I was watching Firefly.Neutrino wrote:Well, it did take you 9 minutes to work out what the problem was...
It matters because those that did it need to be brought to justice. The only problem is that the theorists never shut the f*ck up.dcowboys055 wrote:Yes conspiracy idiots need to be quiet, but don't begin your post 'Americans get over it' as the majority of Americans are not conspiracy idiots.Skittles! wrote:Americans, just get over it already! Does it really matter if the government set up 9/11? NO, because it is the past. Just STFU about it already, NO ONE CARES WHAT YOU CONSPIRACY IDIOTS HAVE TO FUCKING SAY.soundout9 wrote:The gov set-up 9/11wcaclimbing wrote:TL/DR
summary for the lazy people, please?

But... it was Firefly!Neutrino wrote:Well it's still your faultSnorri1234 wrote:Well I was watching Firefly.Neutrino wrote:Well, it did take you 9 minutes to work out what the problem was...
I didn't say anything about whether it matters or not, just to not start the post "Americans, get over it, blah blah blah." Rather, start it "Conspiracy theorists, get over it, blah blah blah."unriggable wrote:It matters because those that did it need to be brought to justice. The only problem is that the theorists never shut the f*ck up.dcowboys055 wrote:Yes conspiracy idiots need to be quiet, but don't begin your post 'Americans get over it' as the majority of Americans are not conspiracy idiots.Skittles! wrote:Americans, just get over it already! Does it really matter if the government set up 9/11? NO, because it is the past. Just STFU about it already, NO ONE CARES WHAT YOU CONSPIRACY IDIOTS HAVE TO FUCKING SAY.soundout9 wrote:The gov set-up 9/11wcaclimbing wrote:TL/DR
summary for the lazy people, please?
Yeah, I'm sure the hijacked planes show up as purple on radar so they are nice and identifiable. Seriously, there had to be at least 50 planes in the New York area during the attacks, you can't follow all of them.jay_a2j wrote:Snorri1234 wrote:A.) I doubt they had much of an idea where the planes were exactly.jay_a2j wrote: Which is the greater loss? The passengers aboard plane 1 ? Or 1,500 in tower 1? Do the math. After the 1st plane hit tower 1 the US should of AT LEAST tried to get some fighters up in the air to try and guide, tail, chaperon or destroy the other 3 hi-jacked planes but they sat on the ground instead.
B.) Chaperoning the planes wouldn't have worked, these terrorists were suiciders. So the only option would have been shooting them down, which meant shooting down a huge plane above a big city where it would most certainly cause lots of casualties.
They had them on radar, they knew exactly where they were even BEFORE they got to the city. You may be right, the only option may have been to shoot them down, but they weren't "over the city" the entire time. Why spend time making up excuses for our government instead of addressing the sheer stupidity of their actions (or inactions)?
Since when are all terrorists Arab?jay_a2j wrote:J-Duds wrote:Alright, enough, we get it already. Blah, blah, blah ... controlled demolition ... temperature of burning jet fuel ... explosions ... free-fall faster than terminal velocity. Let me know if I missed anything.
You know what, just for fun, lets say you're right. Lets assume that the buildings did undergo a controlled demolition, the sounds in fact were bombs, ect. Even if this was the case, why does the government have to be responsible for it? Perhaps terrorists planted bombs to do the actual damage, but used the planes to cause doubt and suspicion to spread through people such as yourself and cause the people to doubt the government. This would then lead them to speak out against the government and cause unrest, ultimately leading to a weaker government that takes less action in foreign policy and regulation of the nation.
Isn't the crazed international conspiracy just as likely to come from the opposite side of the argument?
lol...yeah imagine hundreds of arabs going inside the towers to set it up.....unnoticed! Now THAT is nutty!
And it still wouldn't explain why our air force stood down!