Player to Player Chat

Suggestions that have been archived.

Moderator: Community Team

Post Reply
tals
Posts: 359
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 12:46 pm
Location: UK

Player to Player Chat

Post by tals »

To bring in more diplomacy options.

Tals
User avatar
Ishiro
Posts: 324
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:53 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Under the Rainbow
Contact:

Post by Ishiro »

If you click on the rules link at the top, you'll find that the second rule is:
No secret alliances. You must announce any alliance in the game chat.
lack and company would spend too much time investigating secret alliances if in-game player to player chat existed.
tals
Posts: 359
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 12:46 pm
Location: UK

Post by tals »

Ishiro wrote:If you click on the rules link at the top, you'll find that the second rule is:
No secret alliances. You must announce any alliance in the game chat.
lack and company would spend too much time investigating secret alliances if in-game player to player chat existed.
I'm not sure that makes sense!

My view if it was implemented would be to make ALL chat visible at the point the game is completed - making it obvious if any cheating had been going on, players can then use the feedback per sec.

Secret alliances are possible via MSN or whatever messaging you fancy. Just would add a little bit more diplomacy to the game.

Tals
User avatar
GabonX
Posts: 770
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 10:38 am
Gender: Male
Contact:

Post by GabonX »

If you really want you can just pm players. Thats what I do.
tals
Posts: 359
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 12:46 pm
Location: UK

Post by tals »

GabonX wrote:If you really want you can just pm players. Thats what I do.
Yep PMing is an option - not a bad one, but I still think it would be neat in game and then have the text revealed afterwards :)

Tals
User avatar
Ishiro
Posts: 324
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:53 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Under the Rainbow
Contact:

Post by Ishiro »

That's just it though... there isn't supposed to be any diplomacy except in the public chat or on your game defined team. If you are making treaties and alliances outside the public chat in the game, its against the rules.
tals
Posts: 359
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 12:46 pm
Location: UK

Post by tals »

Ishiro wrote:That's just it though... there isn't supposed to be any diplomacy except in the public chat or on your game defined team. If you are making treaties and alliances outside the public chat in the game, its against the rules.
My understanding is you can only ally when you declare it in public chat - whether a private conversation has taken place before that is not against the rules.

Tals
User avatar
kc-jake
Posts: 149
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 4:29 pm

Post by kc-jake »

Yeah, you can discuss the terms of an alliance in private, but once the alliance has been made, it is to be announced, no terms necessary. Then, once you have broken the alliance, I doubt it needs to be mentioned, you can figure it out pretty quickly. Although if it's not painfully obvious the alliance has been broken, you should mention it.
I was a major back when 1600 was major. Now that I'm back, I get to easily win a bunch of games to get my rank. Thank the 'tards here who suck at this game.
imhot4jesus wrote:Literacy never hurt anybody.
Highest Rank: #154 (Oct 05 '06)
Highest Score: 1725 (Jul 18 '08)
Post Reply

Return to “Archived Suggestions”