Your opinion of Thailand overthrowing there government

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Fri Sep 22, 2006 2:03 am

its funny that grimson is an asshole who doesnt know shit.

w3a2 · Post by **w3a2** » Fri Sep 22, 2006 2:08 am

actually grimson is a lot smarter than you think

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Fri Sep 22, 2006 2:13 am

you asked for it

Grimson · Post by **Grimson** » Fri Sep 22, 2006 11:00 am

Oh WOW, an internet meme! You're pulling out all the stops, aren't you!?

onbekende · Post by **onbekende** » Fri Sep 22, 2006 11:02 am

Freetymes wrote:Time to buy stock in a Burka factory!!!

The general in power is muslim, but they all adore there king. And the most are boedhist.

owheelj · Post by **owheelj** » Fri Sep 22, 2006 11:55 am

Yeah I think it's pretty naive to think that this coup was based on religion.

P Gizzle · Post by **P Gizzle** » Fri Sep 22, 2006 6:35 pm

w3a2 wrote:actually grimson is a lot smarter than you think

so wait.....r u english?

Americans are easy to confuse when they try to guess things

Backglass · Post by **Backglass** » Sat Sep 23, 2006 7:45 am

P Gizzle wrote:Americans are easy to confuse when they try to guess things

Only the stupid ones.

P Gizzle · Post by **P Gizzle** » Sat Sep 23, 2006 9:12 am

Backglass wrote:
P Gizzle wrote:Americans are easy to confuse when they try to guess things

Only the stupid ones.

only the ones who dont get imformation. So......r u English or not?

hitandrun · Post by **hitandrun** » Sat Sep 23, 2006 10:51 am

Backglass wrote:The majority of Americans dont like Bush at the moment, but we wouldnt jeopardize our election process and stability by tossing him out with military force!

It just sounds strange to me. More to the story I am sure.

The American election process is a complete and utter farce, a two party system is not democracy.

The majority of Americans didn't even vote for Bush, either time, he still got in. Ahh, the wonders of yanky politics!!!!

P Gizzle · Post by **P Gizzle** » Sat Sep 23, 2006 10:54 am

hitandrun wrote:
Backglass wrote:The majority of Americans dont like Bush at the moment, but we wouldnt jeopardize our election process and stability by tossing him out with military force!

It just sounds strange to me. More to the story I am sure.

The American election process is a complete and utter farce, a two party system is not democracy.

The majority of Americans didn't even vote for Bush, either time, he still got in. Ahh, the wonders of yanky politics!!!!

uh.....yeah, a majority did vote for bush the second time. and we dont have a two party system. we have a many party system. that's why we ave ralph nader and jesse ventura. Besides our democracy has worked a lot better that anyon else's, we're not the ones who had a king who killed all of his wives, no?

vtmarik · Post by **vtmarik** » Sat Sep 23, 2006 10:56 am

P Gizzle wrote:uh.....yeah, a majority did vote for bush the second time. and we dont have a two party system. we have a many party system. that's why we ave ralph nader and jesse ventura. Besides our democracy has worked a lot better that anyon else's, we're not the ones who had a king who killed all of his wives, no?

No, but we're the ones who trampled all over Clinton's privacy when the Lewinsky thing broke out while we leave Dubya's brother alone when he asks for privacy regarding his twice-convicted daughter Noelle.

Talk about a double standard.

P Gizzle · Post by **P Gizzle** » Sat Sep 23, 2006 10:58 am

still better than killing people. i would assume that you'd agree. And privacy. Come on! there isnt such thing as privacy if ur famous. That's why there's a whole channel dedicated to Hollywood (E!) and that's why we have reality TV!

hitandrun · Post by **hitandrun** » Sat Sep 23, 2006 11:03 am

P Gizzle wrote:we're not the ones who had a king who killed all of his wives, no?

No, but you have a president who kills lots of innocent people across the world. Something to be proud of!!

P Gizzle · Post by **P Gizzle** » Sat Sep 23, 2006 11:05 am

Kills innocent people! ok, what was world war II? i believe that the UK was in it too. and Churchill killed millions by bombing and so did we, yet Churchill is known as the greatest PM in Britain. i dont know but to me, calling the US killers is like the pot calling th kettle black, no?

hitandrun · Post by **hitandrun** » Sat Sep 23, 2006 11:11 am

P Gizzle wrote:Kills innocent people! ok, what was world war II? i believe that the UK was in it too. and Churchill killed millions by bombing and so did we, yet Churchill is known as the greatest PM in Britain. i dont know but to me, calling the US killers is like the pot calling th kettle black, no?

Churchill was a rascist, bigoted f*ck. In no way have I defended Englands war-mongering and there's the difference. Do not have blind faith in your country, I don't in mine. Your government is screwing you over just like governments all over the world. Patriotism=Rascism.

P Gizzle · Post by **P Gizzle** » Sat Sep 23, 2006 11:19 am

patriotism= love for ur situation and relizing you could be starving in Africa wiht no government. Everyone makes mistakes. dont just see one's mistakes, see one's goodness and qualities. For instance, without churchill, London would be under NAZI rule, which i dont want and u dont want.

hitandrun · Post by **hitandrun** » Sat Sep 23, 2006 11:29 am

P Gizzle wrote:patriotism= love for ur situation and relizing you could be starving in Africa wiht no government. Everyone makes mistakes. dont just see one's mistakes, see one's goodness and qualities. For instance, without churchill, London would be under NAZI rule, which i dont want and u dont want.

Pariotism is a dangerous tool used by exploitative governments.

They have government in the countries of Africa.

Without Churchill Hitler would have not been in the position to invade countries in Europe. Read a history book (and not an American one!!)

P Gizzle · Post by **P Gizzle** » Sat Sep 23, 2006 11:36 am

i know they have governments in Africa, they just arent effective at all. Also, i told u to look at the good of people. Churchill saved britain, whether he set it up to fall or not doesnt matter. There's no difference in history books from US to UK, so shut up

hitandrun · Post by **hitandrun** » Sat Sep 23, 2006 11:44 am

P Gizzle wrote:i know they have governments in Africa, they just arent effective at all. Also, i told u to look at the good of people. Churchill saved britain, whether he set it up to fall or not doesnt matter. There's no difference in history books from US to UK, so shut up

True some of the governments in Africa are not what they should be, however, to tar all African governments with the same brush reeks of Neo-conservatism.
If you actually believe that a history book, no matter who it's written by, is not biased then you are very naive.

P Gizzle · Post by **P Gizzle** » Sat Sep 23, 2006 11:50 am

first, i never said all african governments are bad, when i meant to say is i could be in Syria, where the gov't is not nearly as effective as the US, UK, or Canda's.

2nd, i never said the books, arent biased, i said that books, are going to tell u relatively the same thing

hitandrun · Post by **hitandrun** » Sat Sep 23, 2006 11:53 am

This is going nowhere, I'm going to go and play risk!! :wink:

P Gizzle · Post by **P Gizzle** » Sat Sep 23, 2006 11:54 am

allright. let's agree to not dis each other's countries, eh?

hitandrun · Post by **hitandrun** » Sat Sep 23, 2006 11:57 am

Dis the UK all you like, I'll lay off the USA though. :wink:

We should have a game sometime.

P Gizzle · Post by **P Gizzle** » Sat Sep 23, 2006 12:00 pm

im laying off the UK, their not bad, i was just trying to show that dissing the us is like dissin the 1600s england. We're a new country, we're trying to get our act together, just like you guys were when u had Henry XIII. Yeah, we could play a game together sometime. i got nothing open right now, but in 1 turn i will, and i have another gaem where i've been almost dead for a month, but no one will kill me! Let me know :wink: