confirmzimmah wrote:could you ask larsin to confirm that please?pascalleke wrote:me and larsin
i am team leader
Moderator: Tournament Directors
i am trying to get prices, i'm still working on it, and it will be very fun.Sir. Ricco wrote:If I was you I would cut the tournament size in half. Very hard to fill up a 144 player tournament with out any prize and it being doubles. I would even cut it in forth.
Not in.

i will think about that, however, it's more like a bracket system, and therefore a point penalty won't be an option, but maybe there is some other option to solve it.AndrewB wrote:Couple of notes regarding the settings:
1. You have to define what to do in the case of the stalemate. If you have 2vs2vs2 games, you will definitely have some stalemated games.
You have to say something along those lines:
If game is not finished by round XXX(I suggest to select 35 rounds there) then all players receive 0 points or even maybe -1...
Dukasaur wrote:Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
ok, i see, in the case of brackets you might need to start another, tie-breaker game, after a specified round passed.zimmah wrote:i will think about that, however, it's more like a bracket system, and therefore a point penalty won't be an option, but maybe there is some other option to solve it.AndrewB wrote:Couple of notes regarding the settings:
1. You have to define what to do in the case of the stalemate. If you have 2vs2vs2 games, you will definitely have some stalemated games.
You have to say something along those lines:
If game is not finished by round XXX(I suggest to select 35 rounds there) then all players receive 0 points or even maybe -1...
